tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8078379512095504946.post483225728373132601..comments2024-03-29T04:06:37.402-07:00Comments on Had Enough Therapy?: Stigmatizing "Hillary"Stuart Schneidermanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12784043736879991769noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8078379512095504946.post-77635487651575014952016-02-06T09:51:44.855-08:002016-02-06T09:51:44.855-08:00Yes, a distinctive profile. I wonder if the late 8...Yes, a distinctive profile. I wonder if the late 80s spike was from Clinton or some other inspiration? I don't imagine Clinton had a national reputation until 1992 when Bill was elected president. It looks like the first rise was around 1976.<br /><br />The most ordinary surprise in name stats in looking at name frequency is most older traditional names are in steep decline. Most of the other examples show this trend.<br /><br />Here's another blog from 2013, with the variant Hilary having an even more dramatic complete drop to zero around 1993 after a steady rise since 1950. Hilary Duff's 1987 birth fits that rise, and Hilary Swank from 1974. It also contrasts the short spike of Farrah in the late 1970s. <br />https://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2013/02/05/the-rise-and-fall-of-hilary-and-hillary/<br /><br />Anyway, the name Hillary isn't at zero, so there's hope the decision of a few hundred mothers doesn't clearly represent any clear destiny for Hillary Clinton as a potential candidate for president.<br /><br />Contrarians like me almost have to root for Hillary's election, just to spoil conservative's good days.<br /><br />Apparently even NASA is supporting Hillary's bid for president, naming a Pluto Mountain range after her last summer, although they claim its because of Sir Edmund Hillary, that's surely just a cover story to avoid political liabilities.<br />https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hillary_Montes<br />Ares Olympushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09726811306826601686noreply@blogger.com