tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8078379512095504946.post6210947088745101186..comments2024-03-29T04:06:37.402-07:00Comments on Had Enough Therapy?: None Dare Call It Islamic TerrorismStuart Schneidermanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12784043736879991769noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8078379512095504946.post-78729220262288853432013-05-28T08:50:56.495-07:002013-05-28T08:50:56.495-07:00Nice parting shot on Singapore, Stuart. After all,...Nice parting shot on Singapore, Stuart. After all, they have economic prosperity AND caning. <br /><br />This is the collision of two significant global philosophies. On the one side, you have self-congratulatory nihilists who stand for social "progress," also known as the Left. On the other, you have religious fanatics who subscribe to a pre-medieval worldview where faith is separated from reason. This lunatic in London (born in-country, by te way) is the latest scripturally-programmed automaton released onto the native population to settle scores based on an unatched level of victimization. This belief system rationalizes the literal butchering of a human being on an open street in Western Europe. And all the uber-educated, emasculated Western leaders can do is give platitudes in the name of their highest cosmologigal value: tolerance. Yet toerance is a meaningless concept to this enemy. It does not compute.<br /><br />Let's see... A truly psychotic individual shoots up a school in America and we put the Second Amendment to our Constitution on trial as an anachronistic privilege in need of restriction. Yet there are radicalized Islamists in our midst, and we're expected to tolerate their "religion of peace," and protect their rights of speech and religion. I can only assume the logic is because the First Amendment comes before the Second. The butchering in London shows why the Second Amndment is relevant now more than ever. Who's going to protect you? The totalitarian tolerance peddlers? Please.<br /><br />Read Ayan Hrsi Ali's column in today's Wall Street Journal. She doesn't condemn Islam as a cause, but states a dialogue is needed about how Islam, unlike other religions, is being used by some as a vehicle to justify violence upon innocents for no other reason than their choice to not submit to Islam. This just in: we allow people in our society to choose which religion they will belong to. For now, as the Sharia does not make exceptions.<br /><br />The Islamist worldview is fundamentally and essentially incompatible with Western society. Our values are meaningless to the Islamists, and ideas such as tolerance are used as vehicles to build strength and propagate further radicalization. Tolerance is positive proof of weakness to those who mean to kill us as infidels. We'd better wake up and establish assimilation strategies and expectations for those entering our societies. If we don't, we're doomed. You can't declare war and mobilize to fight an enemy who lives in the same community you do. That's the problem with the civil law enforcement solution. It cannot possibly address this type of problem. This is new.<br /><br />TipAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8078379512095504946.post-41920176814247988152013-05-27T19:23:18.753-07:002013-05-27T19:23:18.753-07:00we are certainly not yet at war with the Muslim fa...we are certainly not yet at war with the Muslim faith. But if they want to continue pushing us then at some point we will be actually at war with their faith. Maybe a MOAB centered on the rock in the middle of Ramadan ... would that be what they want ?The Dark Lordhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02235966436741864018noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8078379512095504946.post-11025541471128029402013-05-27T19:15:40.009-07:002013-05-27T19:15:40.009-07:00There is a line I contemplated with regard to the ...There is a line I contemplated with regard to the phrase War on Terror: "Choose your enemies carefully -- they are the people you will become most like."Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8078379512095504946.post-40574649154556797972013-05-27T14:17:01.049-07:002013-05-27T14:17:01.049-07:00It was BUSH!!!!!!11!!!1111!!!!!!
Greenwald had be...It was BUSH!!!!!!11!!!1111!!!!!!<br /><br />Greenwald had been writing some sensible stuff lately. Must have relapsed.Sam L.https://www.blogger.com/profile/00996809377798862214noreply@blogger.com