tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8078379512095504946.post6961364308690866183..comments2024-03-26T06:17:49.527-07:00Comments on Had Enough Therapy?: Megyn Kelly, Feminist WonderwomanStuart Schneidermanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12784043736879991769noreply@blogger.comBlogger8125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8078379512095504946.post-26791397437111227132013-06-02T22:03:04.962-07:002013-06-02T22:03:04.962-07:00Tip,
On the wrestling thing, my feeling is that I...Tip,<br /><br />On the wrestling thing, my feeling is that I believe I would tell my son to "bodyslam that b***h like he would any other boy". He owes her nothing and anyone who says otherwise should have been first up to the plate protesting when this girl came knocking wanting to play.<br /><br />She wants to compete with the boys then let her really compete with the boys...no liability for any damage she might incur.<br /><br />I am reminded of the video of the Cleveland bus driver who gets hit by a crazy woman who has been threatening him and yelling racial epithets at him. He stops the bus, gets up then uppercuts her senseless. Someone yells "that's a female" and he says "I don't care! She wanna be a man, I'm gonna treat her like a man". <br /><br />When will certain persons realize that their theoretical "rights" in an artificial construct such as society don't alter reality.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8078379512095504946.post-56852827161088667862013-06-01T22:41:42.685-07:002013-06-01T22:41:42.685-07:00Tip:
America is a tribe. The tribe is developed ...Tip:<br /><br />America is a tribe. The tribe is developed from the nurture of mothers, first, and fathers, second. If they want to keep it, then they need to provide proper guidance for their children's development in order to preserve their culture, traditions, religion, etc.<br /><br />The diversity proposed by the Left will ensure incoherence and loss of integrity. It is divisive, denigrates individual dignity, and destroys the fabric of our tribe. It cannot be reconciled with a union of disparate but like-minded individuals.n.nhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04252447117532342957noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8078379512095504946.post-51830898248849995562013-06-01T22:33:48.566-07:002013-06-01T22:33:48.566-07:00Tip:
My criticism is directed to "irreconcil...Tip:<br /><br />My criticism is directed to "irreconcilable differences", first, and to an unnatural order, second. The first implies competition or a materially incomplete characterization of your partner. The second, from my perspective, is the outcome of a normalization process which specifically denies the terms and circumstances of reality. There may well be single-parent households, but there should be no effort to normalize this arrangement. There are other ways to accommodate (or tolerate) that unfortunate situation.n.nhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04252447117532342957noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8078379512095504946.post-73260135367715796562013-06-01T22:03:02.358-07:002013-06-01T22:03:02.358-07:00One other thing...
Sam L. had an interesting comm...One other thing...<br /><br />Sam L. had an interesting comment #17 on the "Fat Talk" thread two days ago:<br /><br />"The War On Women is an un-civil war between/among women."<br /><br />Prescient, and I share his view. I believe this to be the case. It's time for women to step up and be heard on these culture issues, and its going to take some moxie, discomfort and smeared lipstick. Stuart provided several sensible examples in this piece here about how men are at a disadvantage in these debates, and why it is not a good thing for them to fight back against his nonsense.<br /><br />If that sounds like a cop-out, I'm sorry. I don't mean it to be. I just don't know what else to say. But this whole thing strikes me as being similar to the issue of a girl years ago here in the state where I live who wanted to wrestle, so she went out for boys wrestling. I don't remember how it all panned out, but I do remember there was quite a rumpus about it. So many vocal women came out to say this girl had "a right" to compete because there was no or corresponding sport offered for girls. I thought it was disgusting. Why? What about those boys who would compete against her? They can't really win, can they? Nor can they afford to lose. It's a ridiculous comtest. They're screwed either way. They're even in a pickle if they refuse to compete. What can a father say to his son? What can a mother say to her son? What can the boy's coach say? There's nothing to say. It's literally cruel to a young man's sense of emerging manhood, which he wants so desperately in a way a woman can never truly understand. There's no way to protect his honor. It's thoroughly emasculating. And this is just another crazy example of the way things have become with this men vs. women debate. It's no longer a contest. And it illustrates the question "How's it going?" The truth is... it's not. Not one bit.<br /><br />So it's up to you, ladies. Good luck. And I hope you take up the standard and fight these liberals and feminists valiantly, because there's a lot on the line. You might lose a few "friends," but you will likely save our country, culture, and the future for girls and boys everywhere. It's worth it.<br /><br />TipAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8078379512095504946.post-68036167201932595412013-06-01T21:26:40.842-07:002013-06-01T21:26:40.842-07:00I saw the story about female breadwinners, and it ...I saw the story about female breadwinners, and it made little sense to me. So I delved into it a bit further, and saw the same thing remarked about here. The way it's been reported is misleading. The dictionary describes a breadwinner as "A person who earns money to support a family." People are reacting to this as if its some battle of the sexes thing, some kind of competition. There is no competition if someone is a single parent. They are ALONE. They fend for themselves. How many human beings do you know who like to fend for themselves and their family alone? It's ridiculous posturing and goading amidst the sad economic story we hear about all too often: survival, just as Bobbye said. Who wants to just survive? It's a ridiculous statistic.<br /><br />This is a Fox News Alert: Radical feminists are angry women who are singly-motivated by their hatred for men. It is single-issue politics at its most perverse. When you attack 49% of the population as your reason for existence, you have a screw loose. It's sad and pathetic. I would never cheer for the diminishment of an entire class of people. It's sickening. Single parenting is very difficult, and it is not the natural order of things. It's hard.<br /><br />As for the "judging" nonsense, that's what it is: nonsense. We live in the Republic of Nice until someone sparks up a tobacco product (now that marijuana use is chic and "medicinal"), doesn't wear a seatbelt, or buys a sugary beverage in too great a quantity. That's what's acceptable for judgment in our back-asswards culture. Wow, what courage such a stand requires. Meanwhile, society is obviously suffering from families at the breaking point (or broken already) and we are left with little else to say but "That's okay." Quite upside down.<br /><br />TipAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8078379512095504946.post-83819993931399100562013-06-01T17:31:32.288-07:002013-06-01T17:31:32.288-07:00So now the exception establishes the rule. This is...So now the exception establishes the rule. This is the same phenomenon as the tale wagging the dog.<br /><br />Anyway, this is more of the same distortions of reality we should expect from special interests.<br /><br />The notion of evolutionary fitness represents "a lingering attachment to a certain ideal".<br /><br />Welcome to the new "normal" or rather normalization through selective denial of the terms and circumstances of reality. This is where women choose to sacrifice virginal human lives for money, ego, and licentious behavior, thereby devaluing human life, both male and female.<br /><br />That's probably an overly harsh assessment. They only devalue certain competing interests in their pursuit of political, economic, and social standing. It seems that reasonable men and women will need to relearn to stand their ground. Civilization can be a paradox.n.nhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04252447117532342957noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8078379512095504946.post-5989208608160526782013-06-01T17:25:09.843-07:002013-06-01T17:25:09.843-07:00This comment has been removed by the author.n.nhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04252447117532342957noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8078379512095504946.post-91886238436355722242013-06-01T12:40:42.464-07:002013-06-01T12:40:42.464-07:00" If they had a free choice most women would ..." If they had a free choice most women would rather not."<br />Women like Megyn Kelly, of course, want to work full time. They make a lot of money and provide many advantages for their children. I suspect single mothers, making little money, are not so gung-ho on working. They work to survive, Megyn Kelly does not.Bobbyenoreply@blogger.com