At around this time last year Stacey Hessler caught Occupy
fever.
The Florida housewife abandoned home, hearth, husband and
four children to camp out in Zuccotti Park in lower Manhattan. She was on a
mission to save the world.
The self-described “vegan freak” who had been “unschooling”
her children: “… proudly identified herself as a midwife’s assistant,
roller-derby queen, rock-star musician, dreadlock princess and African-bee
keeper.”
Hessler did not just go to New York for a weekend jaunt. She
made clear that she was in it for the duration. She was happily going to
sacrifice her family to her cause.
When The New York Post first reported the story it cast
aspersions on Hessler’s lifestyle choice.
The opening paragraphs of its story were slightly
judgmental:
Here’s
your mom, kids. Proud?
The
hippie Florida mother of four who ditched her children and banker husband to
sleep in Zuccotti Park’s squalor hit rock bottom yesterday when she was hauled
off in handcuffs, her dreadlocks flying wildly in every direction, for blocking
a street near the New York Stock Exchange.
Stacey
Hessler, 38, was lifted off the pavement in the center of Broad Street by three
cops who slapped plastic bracelets on her wrists and dragged her away kicking
and screaming.
“What
did I do? What did I do?” she kept shouting.
Writing for Gawker, Hamilton Nolan took serious exception to
the Post’s take on the story. Unwilling to judge Hessler, Nolan was happy to
judge the Post:
The New York Post, the pandering tabloid
of the fascist power structure, has spared no effort chronicling the most
important story of the Occupy Wall Street movement: the presence of some
hippie lady of which the New York Post does not approve.
One might agree with Nolan that Hessler’s dreadlocks were
not the most important aspect of a protest movement. The most important part was
that the Occupy movement caused some trouble and accomplished
nothing.
The biggest story is that a year later no one remembers it
or cares about it. The Occupy movement will go down in history as an especially
impotent protest.
But why does Nolan not find anything wrong when a woman
voluntarily abandons four children to join a mindless protest movement?
Does he feel nothing for Hessler’s motherless children? Does
voluntary child abandonment not register on his moral barometer?
Anyway, Hessler was good to her word. The Occupy movement
fizzled and disappeared but she stayed on, the last straggler of an exercise in
political futility.
The other day we learned that Hessler had made it official:she divorced her husband and gave up custody of her children in exchange for$85,000 and the right to sleep on the street and eat at homeless shelters.
The divorce agreement stipulates that she can only see her
children when they want to see her. Apparently, they are not very proud of Mom.
Again, the New York Post did not paint Hessler in a very
flattering light. It did not approve.
Fear not, Hessler still has her friends at Gawker.
Another Gawker writer, not Hamilton Nolan was horrified at
the New York Post’s judgmental attitude and responded that, “The Post…
[was] predictably enraged at this small showing of personal freedom….”
“… small showing of personal freedom….” That is how the
reliably progressive Gawker describes a woman who abandons her home and her
children for a moribund cause.
If you will, Hessler has freed herself of all personal
responsibility for her family. But should we not see this as a form of child
abandonment and child abuse?
Allowing herself to be swept up in a cause, to the exclusion
of all else, does not look like freedom. It looks like someone who has lost her
mind, taken leave of her rational faculties and sacrificed her children on the
bonfire of her moral vanity.
At the very least, it is reprehensible.
At the worst, it is a sign of a nervous breakdown.
If we want to be charitable, Hessler’s exercise of “personal
freedom” might well be a symptom of an underlying mental illness.
Unfortunately, Hessler thinks that she is sane but that the world
is crazy. She believes that she is fighting for a better world. Gawker thinks
she is a martyr for the cause.
Good luck getting her treatment.
This sounds like a really bad mid-life crisis.
ReplyDeleteShe's a professional political drunkard, so to speak.
Pretty sad.
I was just reading something very like that this morning: "No one who puts his hand to the plow and looks back is fit for service in the kingdom of God."
ReplyDeleteIf the state is the creator and sustainer of all that exists, and leftist politics the source of all righteousness ...
Turns out idolatry has consequences. Who'd have guessed?
"The New York Post, the pandering tabloid of the fascist power structure, has spared no effort chronicling the most important story of the Occupy Wall Street movement: the presence of some hippie lady of which the New York Post does not approve."
ReplyDelete"Fascist?" Fascist how??? How is everything "fascist?" I don't like the power structure neither but......how is it "fascist?" Really folks, we need to start calling them out on this.
As far as disapproval of this idiot woman, what happens when some "redneck" who this guy don;t approve of says or does something? He's probably "fascist."
She now has 2 more kids and refuses to let them see their fathers see them.
ReplyDelete