Last Saturday Dr. Robi Ludwig said this about Elliot Rodger
on Fox News:
When I
was first listening to him, I was like, ‘Oh, he’s angry with women for
rejecting him.’ And then I started to have a different idea: Is this somebody
who is trying to fight against his homosexual impulses? Was he angry with women
because they were taking away men from him?
Her remarks provoked a tirade from Mark Joseph Stern on
Slate:
Now, it
is perfectly reasonable to react to this bizarre conjecture with outrage and disgust. Ample
evidence had, by that point, already illustrated that the shootings
were committed by a man who craved sex with women but couldn’t obtain it. Ludwig’s
claim, then, is totally baseless, leaving us to wonder whether her comments
were motivated less by professional expertise than by anti-gay animus.
But
taking such questions seriously is really granting Fox—and Ludwig—far too much
credit. Ludwig’s claims weren’t just inaccurate; they were absolutely
ridiculous, a spectacle of inane doltishness. By dredging the depths of her
paranoia for the most laughably exaggerated homophobia imaginable, Ludwig’s
remarks crescendoed past the usual droning doublespeak of Fox News’ bigotry and
denialism to an altogether higher register of bleak, unintentionally satirical
commentary on the limitlessness of Fox’s own lunacy. There is much to be angry
about in this world, starting with the misogyny that still permeates our
culture and seems
to have driven Elliot Rodger to kill. But let us not waste our
precious moments earnestly decrying the ramblings of a fool on a third-rate
cable news channel that is already imploding before our eyes.
Why am I mentioning this?
Because, whatever you think of Ludwig’s thought, it is, essentially, pure Freud. To anyone who knows anything about psychoanalysis, the
provenance is unmistakable.
Yes, my friends, Ludwig offered a standard Freudian
interpretation of misogyny.
It feels strange to think that gay rights activists have
embraced Freud for having advanced their cause.
Stern is unable to wrap his mind around these comments, as that would conflict with his worldview. Sooooo:
ReplyDeleteKill the messenger!
"Third-rate cable news channel that is imploding before our eyes." Err ....that would probably be MSNBC...
ReplyDeletePlease let me implode like FOX news. It would seem that the double speak and imploding is more emblematic in MJ Stern.
ReplyDeleteAs they say... imploding on the way to the bank-- no media outlet is anywhere near as profitable as Fox News.
ReplyDeleteRodger's parents say they made their kid see therapists from a young age.
ReplyDeleteBad idea I think.
It both stigmatizes and megalomania-izes the kid.
On the one hand, kid feels something is terribly wrong with him. Otoh, he thinks his problems are sooooooo important that they need ALL THE ATTENTION IN THE WORLD.
It leads to both self-loathing and self-aggrandizement.