tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8078379512095504946.post1722460913283487627..comments2024-03-26T06:17:49.527-07:00Comments on Had Enough Therapy?: Visual Bodily PrivacyStuart Schneidermanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12784043736879991769noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8078379512095504946.post-46973214486590636602019-04-09T19:52:37.263-07:002019-04-09T19:52:37.263-07:00The problem is that they were accepting money from...The problem is that they were accepting money from the State. In Canada organizations were required to sign a statement agreeing to progressive principles as a condition of funding. These principles went directly against several religious groups. Groups who were quite happy to receive this State funding otherwise. There was an outcry and the federal government backed down. But that's just round one. The game, of course, is to push this again, and again, and again until they win. It's the progressive game plan that's obvious enough now.<br /><br />Now think about universal basic income. Every individual gets $10,000 or $20,000 a year above and clear of their own individual income. Can you imagine the element of social control such a thing would allow? And in this age everything is online, we're all online, and our activities day to day are recorded, categorized and analyzed. And the threat of withholding $20,000 would be a decisive factor for many people in their choices and decisions. I know how I would like to imagine people to be but I also know people. <br /><br />Never let the government in. Never let them in.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8078379512095504946.post-15620808960697838202019-04-09T10:21:54.353-07:002019-04-09T10:21:54.353-07:00As Charles Dickens wrote in "Oliver Twist&quo...As Charles Dickens wrote in "Oliver Twist", "The law is a ass--an idiot."Sam L.https://www.blogger.com/profile/00996809377798862214noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8078379512095504946.post-44594588331632995252019-04-09T09:32:40.550-07:002019-04-09T09:32:40.550-07:00A Peeping Tom secretly filming under women’s cloth...A Peeping Tom secretly filming under women’s clothing, upskirt or down blouse photography, has been found to be legal in many places. The rationale appears to be since the woman is out in public she has no expectations of privacy! Some jurisdictions have had to create special legislation to prohibit this obvious and freaky violation of privacy. The school here seems to be taking the side of the Peeping Tom.<br /><br />/EstherAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8078379512095504946.post-84183973314771579132019-04-09T07:57:56.530-07:002019-04-09T07:57:56.530-07:00If there's no longer any right to visual priva...If there's no longer any right to visual privacy, then the judge can't possibly complain when some enterprising prankster plants a video camera in his chambers bathroom and posts the resulting videos on YouTube.<br /><br />Two can play this game.JPL17https://www.blogger.com/profile/10649330420822802850noreply@blogger.com