tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8078379512095504946.post215534630779770975..comments2024-03-26T06:17:49.527-07:00Comments on Had Enough Therapy?: Free Contraception or Free LoveStuart Schneidermanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12784043736879991769noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8078379512095504946.post-47834050739917357572012-03-10T13:44:02.014-08:002012-03-10T13:44:02.014-08:00I would argue that the principal cause of dysfunct...I would argue that the principal cause of dysfunction in America was the sexual revolution and "liberation" of women. It was this "progress" that not only perverted the natural order, but it also corrupted the enlightened order. This "progress" was nothing more than regress. It is the same decadent degeneracy that corrupted and collapsed other civilizations. It is a sort of complacency that follows from perceptions isolated from reality and confined to personal ego.<br /><br />Consider, for instance, that dating is now intended to become familiar with the penis and vagina, rather than the personality and character of the man or woman with which we desire to share a lifetime and family. Is it any surprise that the great majority of marriages conclude with irreconcilable differences? They never actually knew each other or their untold expectations.<br /><br />There were no civil, human, or woman's rights movements per se. They were temporal efforts to address circumstantial -- real and perceived -- grievances. Those grievances were neither unique nor exclusive to the people who claimed injury from them.<br /><br />And because I just can't get enough of Fluke and like-minded who are advocating and advancing agendas which are antithetical to evolutionary fitness and incompatible with the preservation of individual dignity...<br /><br />Fluke, in giving public testimony to promiscuity is correctly considered a slut. In giving public testimony to solicit funds to enable promiscuity is correctly considered a prostitute. In advocating for behavior without consequence, and in advancing opposition to the natural order and evolutionary fitness, she is committing crimes against humanity.<br /><br />I am tempted to assign exclusive responsibility for the progressive degeneracy in our society to the American left and their allies. However, I will not excuse corruption in the exception, which is capable of mimicking fundamental corruption. Still, it's a useful and productive exercise to attempt distinguishing between cause and effect.<br /><br />This nonsense is cyclical. People do learn from history, then they rationalize their circumstances, which leads them to repeat history.<br /><br />I wonder if God actually needed to intervene in the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah. Whether it is God or nature's order underlying our world, the consequences of our defiance is predictable. It is unadulterated arrogance to believe humanity has achieved mortal god status capable of defying the natural order. Our consciousness allows us to influence our environment; our technology amplifies that effect; but, we are inviolably constrained by the greater order of God or nature.n.nhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04252447117532342957noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8078379512095504946.post-20929023332127407172012-03-10T11:19:34.086-08:002012-03-10T11:19:34.086-08:00You said: Radical feminists like Fluke believe tha...You said: <i>Radical feminists like Fluke believe that sexual activity is hygienic. They believe that women should have as much sex as possible because it promotes mental health.</i><br /><br />I've thought so for years, but I haven't been able to articulate it quite so well.<br /><br />But it's an attitude that's more universally accepted. I start to believe that it's a common belief, and thought to be true for men, too.<br /><br />Frankly, I doubt it. But just try to intimate otherwise in polite conversation. It's almost a heresy.Joehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10080690295987218010noreply@blogger.com