tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8078379512095504946.post2412735369952068179..comments2024-03-26T06:17:49.527-07:00Comments on Had Enough Therapy?: When Women Can't CompeteStuart Schneidermanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12784043736879991769noreply@blogger.comBlogger9125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8078379512095504946.post-14742459565447215502016-04-30T05:31:58.745-07:002016-04-30T05:31:58.745-07:00Lindsey Harold,
Take heart because the vast major...Lindsey Harold,<br /><br />Take heart because the vast majority of women are with you on this and this includes women already in the military. I note that it is the feminist who believes they would not be subjected to combat that find this worthwhile. There are no amount of women they world not sacrifice for their desire for political power. One only needs to look at the history of the feminist agenda to notice that it is young women who bear the burden of the fallacy that is feminism.<br />Dennishttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14962996070458991675noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8078379512095504946.post-18159170902876364862016-04-29T07:11:13.503-07:002016-04-29T07:11:13.503-07:00IAC, at least thanks to George W. Bush we've c...IAC, at least thanks to George W. Bush we've confirmed that women can be just as sadistic and unremorseful as men following orders.<br />http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/us-soldier-who-abused-prisoners-at-abu-ghraib-refuses-to-apologise-for-her-actions-7579422.html<br /><br />On the other hand, fundamentalistic Islam has different ideas, and says women should be protected from the threat of brutality of strangers, and must be protected 24-7 by fathers, brothers, and husbands, and so their experiences of brutality are limited to the behind closed doors of home as God intended.<br />Ares Olympushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09726811306826601686noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8078379512095504946.post-22614891733607648632016-04-29T05:09:40.977-07:002016-04-29T05:09:40.977-07:00Ares Olympus @April 29, 2016 at 3:46 AM:
Of cours...Ares Olympus @April 29, 2016 at 3:46 AM:<br /><br />Of course it looks sensible to you, Ares. Ignatius Acton Chesterton OCDhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18222603717128565302noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8078379512095504946.post-48579948801912100622016-04-29T03:46:43.039-07:002016-04-29T03:46:43.039-07:00IAC: On Wednesday, April 27, 2016, the House Armed...IAC: On Wednesday, April 27, 2016, the House Armed Services Committee voted 32-30 to recommend mass conscription of females. That means women can be drafted into the armed forces and serve in combat.<br /><br />It looks sensible to me, even if mainly symbolic. The only trick to me is over lowering standards for women. If men are excluded based on a failure of standards, then women should also be excluded on the same standards. But if men who fail standards on some jobs are designated to other jobs with different standards, then the same can be done for women.<br /><br />And there may be some jobs that women will out perform men. Besides, it looks like warfare has been reduced to flying drones from 6000 miles away, so not many of those women are going to become prisoners of war.<br /><br />http://thehill.com/policy/defense/277962-defense-bill-would-require-women-to-register-for-draft<br />-----<br />Rep. Chris Gibson (R-N.Y.) added that if women were drafted, they wouldn’t be forced into jobs that they aren’t equipped to do.<br /><br />“What we have right now is standards-based,” he said. “The fact of the matter is, if we need hundreds of thousands of folks to serve, that hasn’t changed any reality of if it’s going to be standards-based of who’s going to be in the infantry and who might be supporting.”<br />-------<br />Ares Olympushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09726811306826601686noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8078379512095504946.post-31170388680842780462016-04-27T22:49:55.223-07:002016-04-27T22:49:55.223-07:00Lindsay Harold @April 27, 2016 at 5:06 PM:
Politi...Lindsay Harold @April 27, 2016 at 5:06 PM:<br /><br />Political correctness is vacuous, and common sense is now frighteningly uncommon. <br /><br />You are spot on. This idea of conscripting women for military service is insane.Ignatius Acton Chesterton OCDhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18222603717128565302noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8078379512095504946.post-7738919490209318772016-04-27T22:47:00.329-07:002016-04-27T22:47:00.329-07:00On Wednesday, April 27, 2016, the House Armed Serv...On Wednesday, April 27, 2016, the House Armed Services Committee voted 32-30 to recommend mass conscription of females. That means women can be drafted into the armed forces and serve in combat.<br /><br />“I actually think if we want equality in this country, if we want women to be treated precisely like men are treated and that they should not be discriminated against, we should be willing to support a universal conscription,” Rep. Jackie Speier, D-Calif., said after the vote.<br /><br />Who the hell wants "women to be treated precisely like men are treated"??? How many women daily feel the terrifying sting of this horrible discrimination? <br /><br />This is complete lunacy. <br /><br />This is a social experiment that defies biological realities. Anyone who's passed basic biology and also finished the reproductive section of health class knows that the human gestation period is 9 months. The man's contribution of gametes takes moments. Civilizations carry on through generations when they can generate new offspring. Men can't carry a child and give birth. It's a tremendous gift only women can deliver, and it takes a long, long time. Then there is the long human childhood. We're going to willingly throw our women in mass waves of frontal assaults to take fixed positions? Are these people mad???<br /><br />We distinguish that men and women should compete in separate spheres in the Olympics, save equestrian. Seems we should stop that if we're willing to sacrifice women in a mechanized battlefield slaughter. Medals are trifles compared to life. Seems there are a number of areas of society where we could catch up in before deploying conscripted women in combat.<br /><br />Women should not be drafted. Women should not serve in combat. This is fast becoming a degenerate nation, when we conscript those who give life in the name of "equality," when no such biological equality exists. It is patently ridiculous. I find this sickening.<br /><br />The House of Representatives is controlled by the Republican Party. I hope the larger body will come to its senses, lest such foolish mental meanderings actually become law. But it mystifies me how such a silly measure could clear a significant committee like Armed Services. Who's running the show?<br /><br />We are not Israel, surrounded by enemies with mere miles between us. Mass conscription is for massing large military forces for land and naval warfare on a huge scale. We are bordered by two great oceans. We have a significant nuclear arsenal. We have many millions of males eligible for military service. This is totally unnecessary, purely ideological, and cynical in the most grotesque way.<br /><br />Stop the ride, I want to get off!Ignatius Acton Chesterton OCDhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18222603717128565302noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8078379512095504946.post-35160721539188713482016-04-27T17:49:33.097-07:002016-04-27T17:49:33.097-07:00Stuart: If men are hard-wired to compete, if compe...Stuart: If men are hard-wired to compete, if competing is in their nature, why have these companies decided to go to war against nature?<br /><br />Wow, feminists in their most lustful dreams couldn't make a better argument about men than this. Men exists to be used up and discarded. That's what they're for. <br /><br />Yes, men are competitive and become unhappy if you're not challenging them with another carrot to the next rung in an ever smaller ladder of success. Why fight nature?<br /><br />But men are also apparently "hard-wired" to kill themselves after middle age when they find their skills obsolete, or too expensive for employers looking at their bottom line, their nest egg stolen by their exs, and their children who won't talk to them. Why indeed should companies care about their employees future after using them up? There'll always be more men to replace them.<br /><br />Or if they still have some testosterone left in their degraded state, men are also "hard-wired" to go postal when things don't go their way.<br /><br />Probably "real men" with honor kill themselves, while it's the sissy losers who finally grab for the guns for revenge after years of humiliation, but in either case, it's their problem, not ours. They're the ones who were competitive, and they had their shot, and they lost.Ares Olympushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09726811306826601686noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8078379512095504946.post-75215579154132836972016-04-27T17:06:41.521-07:002016-04-27T17:06:41.521-07:00I know it’s not very politically-correct to say th...I know it’s not very politically-correct to say this, but women should never be placed in combat positions in the military. Women, by their very design, are not as well-suited for battle conditions as men. This includes multiple aspects of their physical and mental design.<br /><br />http://www.lindsays-logic.blogspot.com/2016/01/why-women-should-not-be-in-combat.htmlLindsay Haroldhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13094965953749825163noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8078379512095504946.post-72161124004641958992016-04-27T10:20:51.002-07:002016-04-27T10:20:51.002-07:00"Men and woman are different. They function d..."Men and woman are different. They function differently. They have different priorities... Apparently, they believe that God got it wrong. Or else, if you prefer, that evolution went awry."<br /><br />So let's get rid of God. Problem solved.<br /><br />American women in combat is the most insane, bat guano crazy idea out there. It is self-referentially stupid and idiotic.<br /><br />Fighting the enemy is the last thing on the minds of our leaders today. That's because an "enemy" is a phantasmic social construct, just as gender is. We just need to talk more about it...<br /><br />That's change you can believe in. Forward! I'm ready for Hillary! Behold, the Mockingjay!Ignatius Acton Chesterton OCDhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18222603717128565302noreply@blogger.com