tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8078379512095504946.post2715658650562029916..comments2024-03-29T04:06:37.402-07:00Comments on Had Enough Therapy?: A Black and White World Meets AsiansStuart Schneidermanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12784043736879991769noreply@blogger.comBlogger8125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8078379512095504946.post-25414065378043275712018-07-26T20:02:08.466-07:002018-07-26T20:02:08.466-07:00Truncated GK Chesterton:"...will believe anyt...Truncated GK Chesterton:"...will believe anything".<br />Will ideate for food...errr...social acceptance.<br /><br />- shoe<br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8078379512095504946.post-75130953126099176112018-07-26T16:07:01.326-07:002018-07-26T16:07:01.326-07:00Most importantly, this kind of thinking is how you...Most importantly, this kind of thinking is how you get preposterous assertions like “You didn’t build that.”<br /><br />Now I understand, having had my eyes opened by these sage minds. I guess it stands to reason that randomness built that. <br /><br />Wow.Ignatius Acton Chesterton OCDhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18222603717128565302noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8078379512095504946.post-83388191666946074572018-07-26T16:04:18.360-07:002018-07-26T16:04:18.360-07:00This comment has been removed by the author.Ignatius Acton Chesterton OCDhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18222603717128565302noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8078379512095504946.post-8083904888375373752018-07-26T16:02:34.461-07:002018-07-26T16:02:34.461-07:00Hong and Page: "Ultimately, the gain in indiv...Hong and Page: "Ultimately, the gain in individual abilities is more than offset by the functional diversity of a group of randomly selected people." <br /><br />More nonsense. Randomness yields a norm. A norm is an even distribution. An even distribution yields a mean. A mean is an average. There is no gain, by definition. <br /><br />Nothing great was ever created by averageness. This is self-evident to anyone without a PhD. in statistics supplemented by an unhealthy dose of social science idealism. Add arrogance and groupthink. Stir. <br /><br />These sentimental notions fall on their face. <br /><br />FAIL.Ignatius Acton Chesterton OCDhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18222603717128565302noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8078379512095504946.post-35566955378140250712018-07-26T15:54:56.887-07:002018-07-26T15:54:56.887-07:00Trigger is right. They’re control freaks... ideali...Trigger is right. They’re control freaks... idealists who cannot bear failure. Achievement is not random, it it intentional. Diversity, as they describe it, is some mystical, desirable state of equilibrium. That’s pure nonsense. Life is not an equal distribution of categories. Achievers disrupt because of ontological desire. You know, the realm of soul and spirit. But you can’t categorize that, can you? That’s why demographic selection based on immutable characteristics is a fool’s errand. What else is today’s university but a gaggle of fools running silly errands? The shoe fits.Ignatius Acton Chesterton OCDhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18222603717128565302noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8078379512095504946.post-7386725991167132018-07-26T15:54:45.282-07:002018-07-26T15:54:45.282-07:00And...they seem not to be interested in actually e...And...they seem not to be interested in actually educating our African-American students to the level that they can do well in elite/expensive colleges.Sam L.https://www.blogger.com/profile/00996809377798862214noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8078379512095504946.post-17508814084827894512018-07-26T15:46:31.371-07:002018-07-26T15:46:31.371-07:00The Left hates achievement because it hates standa...The Left hates achievement because it hates standards. It hates standards because Leftists either (a) cannot achieve the standards themselves, or (b) don’t have the courage to uphold the standards. What stands in the way is emotive oppression, and they take no responsibility for their emotions. They project this emotional circus on everyone else in order to gain power over others. So it’s someone or something else’s fault. The race thing is a useful tool in the hands of a destroyer. That’s just who Leftists are: destroyers.Ignatius Acton Chesterton OCDhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18222603717128565302noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8078379512095504946.post-69737117713597302752018-07-26T05:11:27.561-07:002018-07-26T05:11:27.561-07:00Well, we know that "science" says, at le...Well, we know that "science" says, at least according to Drs Hong and Page (discoverers of a "theorem" popular among Western Baizuo), "diversity trumps ability".<br /><br />From that, one may infer, and even cakalate using maff, that the Manhattan Project (or the Apollo 11 moon shot, the invention of the integrated circuit, the design of packet-switched networking, the discovery of cosmic background radiation, etc etc etc) would have been faster and more successful had it been staffed by the correct numbers of randomly selected blacks, latinos, etc., balanced by 50% womyn, all sifted appropriately to represent the visible and invisible sexuomagnetic gender "spectrum". <br /><br />Because, "Ultimately, the gain in individual abilities is more than offset by the functional diversity of a group of randomly selected people." <br />QED<br /><br />You can read the source of that quote, the maff-intensive, highly scientifical, Hong and Page paper here:<br />http://www.pnas.org/content/101/46/16385<br />trigger warningnoreply@blogger.com