It took public relations genius to make a handful of white
schizophrenics the face of American gun violence. And to blame it on the NRA.
Give credit to those who used the massacres at Tucson,
Aurora and Newtown to obscure the issue of who is really committing gun
violence in America.
New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg has launched a crusade for
stricter gun laws, so that all of America can have restrictive gun laws, like
his city does..
How’s that working out?
Glad you asked. In New York City last weekend 25 people were
shot in 48 hours. 6 people were killed.
Those of us who believe that the gun violence committed by
paranoid schizophrenics can best be controlled by committing and treating such
patients involuntarily have had their voices drowned out by the drumbeat
against the NRA.
The people who wrote the laws allowing paranoid
schizophrenics to control their own treatment bear the greatest responsibility
for what these poor souls do with their “freedom.”
Given the way mental illness is classified schizophrenics
and other psychotics are thrown into the same class as people who are depressed
and anxious. Psychiatrists know well that when they are dealing with psychotics
they are dealing with a completely different illness, yet the laws do not
recognize that individuals suffering from a brain disease cannot exercise
judgment about their condition or treatment.
Amazingly, those who are willing to allow schizophrenics run
wild insist that they are trying to ensure that these patients willingly get
treatment. They are worried that the stigma on mental illness is causing them
to turn away from treatment.
In a long and compelling article about the problems families
confront when trying to get help for their violent, schizophrenic children, the
Wall Street Journal quotes Ira Burnim, a man who runs a foundation that
supposedly defends the human rights of psychotics:
Advocates
for the mentally ill disagree on how to reconcile the tension between patient
rights and public safety. Confidentiality is vital to ensure patients seek
treatment, says Ira Burnim of the David L. Bazelon Center for Mental Health
Law, a Washington, D.C., advocacy group.
"The
current system discourages patients" from seeking care because of the
stigma of mental illness, says Mr. Burnim. He argues for a system of
"assertive community treatment," in which therapists actively work
with patients to help them build the habits needed to stick to their therapy.
"The key is everything is done voluntarily, which means the patients buy
into the treatment plan," he said.
This is absurd. Given a free choice, most paranoid
schizophrenics will refuse treatment because they do not want it. They are
afraid that medication will silence their voices and make it more difficult to
sustain their delusions. The last thing they are worried about is the stigma
attached to mental illness.
To think otherwise is to reveal a profound ignorance about
psychosis. You cannot expect voluntary compliance from patients who have no willpower.
When the voice of God tells you to open fire or to jump off
the building, you are not thinking about a stigma. You are not thinking about
anything: you are obeying the command.
Many psychotics, as the Journal reports, commit horrific
crimes. Do you really believe that James Holmes and Adam Lanza were worrying
about social stigmas when they opened fire? Did they care about being
ostracized by polite society?
Another set of laws makes it impossible for physicians to
discuss a patient’s case with the patient’s parents. In the state of
Pennsylvania the child gains the right to privacy when he is 14.
The Journal recounts the case of a paranoid schizophrenic named
Matthew Milam. I quote it at length because it offers a picture of sides of the debate that no one ever mentions.
Surely, it is true that science has made significant
advances in discovering medication to treat schizophrenia. And yet, when you
allow the patient the choice of whether or not he is going to take his
medication, it does not much matter how effective the medication is.
Second, most discussions of mental health care assume that
qualified and credentialed medical professionals are all doing a great job.
After all, doesn’t the credentialing process guarantee it?
In the case of Matthew Milam some psychiatrists knew what
was happening. Some did not get it. Those who were empowered to release the
young man from a treatment facility were apparently oblivious to the reality of
his condition:
Milam, a businessman in Harahan, La., said his
son grappled with mental illness from adolescence. Diagnosed as paranoid and
schizophrenic, Matthew Milam, 24, once cut his own throat. Another time he dug
a grave for himself in the backyard.
In
October 2011 he was admitted to an Ochsner Health System facility in New
Orleans and discharged eight days later—over the protests of his father, who
assembled signed affidavits attesting to his son's behavior. Matthew Milam's
longtime psychiatrist, Milton Anderson, who worked at the same facility, had
written in reports that the young man was "a very high risk for suicide or
other bad outcomes."
Pat
Milam says he hand-delivered the documents to the doctors. "I didn't want
them to say, 'We didn't understand you thought he was that dangerous,' "
he said.
Citing
HIPAA, the staff wouldn't discuss his son's treatment, Pat Milam said.
What
Mr. Milam didn't know: Professionals at the facility had noted "several
days of escalating homicidal and suicidal ideation." One nurse noted that
Matthew Milam had "a suicide plan." The notations were in documents
Mr. Milam by law couldn't access.
Nevertheless,
doctors concluded Matthew was improving and could be discharged. According to
treatment records later released to the family, the young man said he wasn't
suicidal. Doctors thought he would stick to his treatment, Mr. Milam said.
The
family brought him home. On Oct. 21, Pat Milam said his son offered to fix him
eggs for breakfast, then went to his room. When his mother looked in on him, he
was sitting in the closet. Pat Milam was about to call the police when he heard
the explosion.
According
to police reports, the young man had attached a shotgun shell to a 12-inch
piece of steel pipe. He put it in his mouth and lighted a fuse attached to the
shell through small holes he drilled.
I agree, and have excerpted your post here: http://bobagard.blogspot.com/2013/06/mental-illness-and-public-safety.html
ReplyDeleteThank you, Bob.
ReplyDelete