Once upon a time we Americans were anguished to learn that certain people hated us. What could we have done to deserve
such rancor? For those who believed that we must have done something to provoke
the anger, it was puzzling.
“Why do they hate us?”
became a battle cry for therapy. If only we knew why they hated
us, we could change, and then, mirable dictu,
they would cease to hate us. Neat, clean, precise… problem solved.
At some future point we will wonder why we were worrying
ourselves about why Islamist terrorists hate us. It takes very little acumen to see that they
hate us because they are in the hate business, and we happen to be the biggest
target.
That wasn’t too difficult, now was it?
As it happens, the Obama administration has done its level
best to ensure that the Muslim world likes us. Make that… really, really likes
us.
In Egypt it has enjoyed a limited success. The Islamists who
are running that sad country like us. They like us a lot.
But then, somehow or other, many people in newly democratic
Egypt still hate us. Only, it's not the same people. Those who hate us now comprise the democracy advocates and the Christians
who are being harassed and persecuted by the government that we have empowered.
The Wall Street Journal reports the sad story:
Anger
against the U.S. is nothing new in the Middle East, and neither are conspiracy
theories in which Washington plays a strong, silent hand.
But
rarely have such theories placed U.S. influence so squarely behind Islamists
such as Mr. Morsi, a former leader in the powerful Muslim Brotherhood that the
White House helped to subdue for decades by backing successive anti-Islamist
autocrats.
In Egypt, people who love freedom hate America, because,
after all, America has put itself on the side of the Muslim Brotherhood. Maybe
that’s what the administration meant when it called for a foreign policy reset.
Egyptians pay close attention to American diplomacy. They
saw our policy clearly when Mohamed Morsi was elected president of Egypt:
Immediately
after the Brotherhood cited its own unofficial tallies in announcing that Mr.
Morsi had won presidential elections in June 2012, then-Secretary of State
Hillary Clinton angered anti-Islamist politicians when she called on Egyptian
authorities to "support the democratic transition" and yield power to
an elected president.
Activists
were further vexed when Mr. Morsi announced a constitutional declaration
awarding himself power over the judiciary. The announcement sparked suspicion
because it came immediately after Mrs. Clinton visited Cairo and activists complained
the U.S. didn't condemn Mr. Morsi's action.
True to its policy, the Obama administration appointed an
ambassador to Egypt who is either incompetent or is very fond of the
Brotherhood.
The Journal reports:
But
comments by Anne Patterson, the U.S. ambassador to Egypt, earlier in June at an
Egyptian pro-democracy organization have sparked a renewed eruption of
anti-American sentiment in the secular media.
In an
effort to "set the record straight" about the U.S. relationship with
the Brotherhood, Ms. Patterson said the White House supported Mr. Morsi because
he was fairly elected and poured cold water on protesters' plans to oust him on
June 30.
"Some
say that street action will produce better results than elections. To be
honest, my government and I are deeply skeptical," Ms. Patterson told the
audience of mostly activists. "More violence on the streets will do little
more than add new names to the lists of martyrs. Instead, I recommend Egyptians
get organized."
The
backlash from activist corners was fast and fierce. George Ishaq, a prominent
Egyptian Christian and longtime pro-democracy campaigner attacked Ms. Patterson
on the popular talk show "The Issue" on Al Hayat, Egypt's
most-watched satellite channel.
"She
is an evil lady who is creating divisions. How is this any of her
business?" Mr. Ishaq said of Ms. Patterson. "If I saw her walking
down the street I would tell her, 'shut up and mind your own business.' "
In a
profile of Ms. Patterson titled "The Brotherhood's Ambassador," the
anti-Islamist newspaper Al Watan called her a "pariah" among Egypt's
political opposition. Secularist former parliamentarian Mustafa Al Bakri
announced on television that Ms. Patterson had been recruited into a
Brotherhood "sleeper cell."
A
leader in the pro-democracy group The National Association for Change called
Ms. Patterson's comments "provocative" and dangerous.
The new American policy toward s Egypt is based, Caroline Glick suggests, on hope and a prayer. It is certainly not based on American
interest, American values or an understanding of the situation in Egypt:
The
Obama administration supports the Morsi government even as it persecutes
Christians. It supports the Muslim Brotherhood even though the government has
demonstrated economic and administrative incompetence, driving Egypt into
failed state status. Egypt is down to its last few cans of fuel. It is facing
the specter of mass starvation. And law and order have already broken down
entirely. It has lost the support of large swathes of the public. But still Obama
maintains faith.
So, in Egypt, the Obama administration has succeeded to
getting our friends, the people who share our values to hate us. The nicest
thing we can say is that it’s amateur hour in American foreign policy.
From the WSJ today, one must wonder if Obama's deep disdain for his own country is the source of all this:
ReplyDelete"[This Administration rarely seems to exact any price for the misbehavior of other countries that our diplomatic demarches are now treated with such open disdain] is why Mr. Snowden remains in a Moscow airport terminal, making demands (via his father) of the terms the U.S. must meet before he returns home. This is also how Russia merrily arms Bashar Assad's forces in Syria, and how Mr. Assad unleashes chemical weapons on his own people, and how Iran marches toward an atomic bomb—all with little concern for what the U.S. might do."
Why do "they" hate us? Maybe because they know that, because we have elected this man President twice, we've made t clear that we hate ourselves.
If everything is relative to Barack Obama, countries with absolute goalie/ends (like China, Russia, Iran) will make quick work of our wobbly diplomatic positions. Obama has shown his words mean nothing...
Anyway, this is a distraction from Obama's true joy (tthe trappings of power, travel), one that takes his eye off the world's most dangerous menace: Republicans. He must make us safe from the GOP!
Tip
I think that Michelle meant it when she said she had never been proud of her country before it had nominated her husband. Apparently, it was not sufficient to overcome all of her and his contempt.
ReplyDeleteSure she meant it. After being indoctrinated at Princeton and Harvard, one cannot be surprised at such a remark. The "contempt" you refer to is part of the cool, lefty chic both Obamas mastered as they became power-intoxicated robots they are today. They make the Clintons look modest.
ReplyDeleteDo you remember how quickly Obama's '08 campaign shut her up after that episode? She wasn't heard from again until after the election. No major speeches, nothing.
Klein's book "The Amateur" portrays her as an overwhelming, narcissistic, hot-blooded woman. That book really made is sound like the real political decisions were made in the White House's executive residence side, by Michelle and Valerie Jarrett. The list of aides who couldn't stand those two is very long, including Robert Gibbs and Rahm Emanuel. Even Axelrod finds them tedious.
Tip
And sometimes it's because they can't/won't blame themselves.
ReplyDeleteNow, we agree they have reason. Still, they have to fix their own problems.