Surely, Elizabeth Wurtzel offered the best account of
growing up on Prozac, but Katherine Sharpe has made an excellent contribution
to the topic in her book: Coming of Age
on Zoloft. Recently, Maria Popova wrote an interesting commentary on it for
the Brain Pickings blog.
Popova summarized the issue:
Sharpe
points out a troubling corollary: In permeating everyday life so profoundly,
antidepressants also embedded themselves in youth, with an ever-growing number
of teenagers taking psychopharmaceuticals to abate depression, ADHD, and other
mental health issues. And while relief from the debilitating and often deadly
effects of adolescent depression is undoubtedly preferable over the
alternative, it comes with a dark side: Antidepressants confuse our ability to
tell our “true self” from the symptoms of the disease, and from the effects of
the medication, at a time when the search for selfhood and the construction of
personal identity are at their most critical and formative stages.
In other words, how do you know whether your feelings are really
yours? How do you know whether your complacency is really a sign of what is
going on in the world and not an artificial, chemically-induced emotion? If you
are feeling upbeat and optimistic does that mean that you have reason to feel
confident or that you have been drugged? If you are not feeling anxious about
lurking danger, does that mean that there are no lurking dangers?
Prozac will do wonders for your moods, and, Popova notes, in
some cases that is all to the good. Yet, in others, it places vulnerable
individuals in a condition that, strangely enough, resembles what happens when
someone is traumatized.
If you have been hurt or abused, your mind will go into
trauma avoidance mode. You will become overly sensitive to some stimuli and
numb to others. Thus, you will not be able to trust your emotions.
Knowing your mind, in the sense of knowing what you are
feeling is critical for your ability to negotiate your world and navigate everyday
life. If you cannot trust your emotions you will be disoriented and disaffected.
Sharpe offers what appears to be the view commonly held by today’s therapists. Adolescence, therapists believe, is a time when young
people are supposed to find themselves, thus to discover what they feel when they feel like themselves:
Worries
about how antidepressants might affect the self are greatly magnified for
people who begin using them in adolescence, before they’ve developed a stable,
adult sense of self. Lacking a reliable conception of what it is to feel “like
themselves,” young people have no way to gauge the effects of the drugs on
their developing personalities. Searching for identity — asking “Who am I?” and
combing the inner and outer worlds for an answer that seems to fit — is the
main developmental task of the teenage years. And for some young adults, the
idea of taking a medication that could frustrate that search can become a
discouraging, painful preoccupation.
Allow me to correct some of this. If you feelings are a
guide that can help you to make your way through reality, you need to know how
to read them correctly, how to read them as a function of current reality and
not as a function of past trauma. The issue of how it feels to be Me or You
does not make a lot of sense, to me at least.
For example, if someone walks up to you and asks: Who are
you?, the correct answer is to state your name. You may be Frank Jones or
Jocelyn Martin… but, until the new order arrives, that is who you are.
Surely, when someone asks you who you are you do not respond
by saying that you feel mad, glad, sad or bad. Such information may or may not
be relevant to your interlocutor, but first, he needs to know who is feeling these
feelings.
It is also fair to mention that if your mood shifts one day
from mad to glad, you will not think that you have become someone else.
Regardless of what you feel, if you are Frank or Jocelyn when you are sad you
are Frank or Jocelyn when you are in love.
The concept of identity requires clarification. First, we
must first notice that identity is a relationship. We say that something is identical to something else. Or else, we can say that it differs from
something else. You might want to believe that X is identical with itself or
that X is identical with X, but that feels like a tautology. It is useful for
creating a formal logic, but it will not solve your identity crisis.
Furthermore, your identity is not just something you feel
inside you. As the Chinese would say, it involves your face more than your
feelings. Your face is what you present to the world; it signifies your social
being.
If you feel that you are Frank and everyone you meet sees Mac, you will quickly be unsure of whether you are Frank.
Were it not for therapy people would not be overly confused
about who they are. Yet, it is not enough to know your name; you must begin,
during adolescence, to establish your good name.
Adolescents do not need to discover what they feel. They
need to know what they should do. Scientists generally agree that the area of
the brain that controls ethical behavior does develop until a child reaches
adolescence.
Adolescents need to begin to create an identity as ethical beings. The first rule that a teenager should learn to follow is this
one: to be good to his word, to keep his promises, to do what he says he will
do.
If his actions correlate with his vows, his commitments and
his promises he will gain an identity. Thus, he will be to others what he says
he is… there will never be a doubt of who is he or what he is going to do.
If you say you are going to do one thing and then do
another, you will never know which is the real you—the you who promised to do
this or the you who did that. Rummage through your emotions all you want… you
will never find out which one is really you. Of course, no one else will know
either.
This is an article on the spiritual problem of the psychological double bind:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.satyogainstitute.org/dharma-teachings/transformational-essays/item/28-double-bind-ego-psychoanalysis.html
This is a long pdf by experts on chronic traumatization and identity challenges.
http://www.estd.org/conferences/presentations/Onno%20van%20der%20Hart.pdf
A Zen master said, "A strong ego is necessary. I am not others; others are not myself. But it is not necessary to have an egotistical ego." I was present for a talk by another Zen master with the title: I and not-I are one.
Let us begin to share knowledge to improve the quality of intelligent and advanced society. A lot of things we need to learn to achieve success
ReplyDelete