Today is Fair and Balanced Day.
The Wall Street Journal
editorial page is chastising, even excoriating Congressional Republicans for
having botched the debt ceiling negotiations so badly. And Andrew Sullivan, reliable supporter of President Obama joining people like Robert Gibbs-- yes, that Robert Gibbs-- in calling the Obamacare website
the administration’s biggest blunder.
It’s not about speaking truth to power, but about speaking
truth to friends who do not want to hear it. Effectively, it's a good sign.
First, today’s WSJ
editorial (boldface of money graph, mine):
… House
Republicans also blundered in refusing to accept the Senate proposal to delay a
reinsurance tax of about $60 a year per insured person. Democrats originally
passed this tax to help float ObamaCare's exchanges. Insurers pay the per capita
fee, which they can pass along to consumers in higher premiums, and the fee
goes to a fund that then pays back the insurers if they end up with a mix of
patients with higher than average claims.
House
Republicans objected to the delay in the tax because unions supported the delay
for their own insurance plans, but that was short-sighted. Senate Democrats
were willing to delay the tax for a year to please labor and in return agree to
better income verification for Americans who apply for ObamaCare subsidies. So
out of political pique, House Republicans opposed two ways to make ObamaCare
less destructive. Senate Republicans should try to retain it in their
compromise.
This
is the quality of thinking—or lack thereof—that has afflicted many GOP
conservatives from the beginning of this budget showdown. They picked a goal
they couldn't achieve in trying to defund ObamaCare from one House of Congress,
and then they picked a means they couldn't sustain politically by pursuing a
long government shutdown and threatening to blow through the debt limit.
President
Obama called their bluff, no doubt in part to blame the disruption on the GOP
and further tarnish the party's public image. Now the most Republicans will get
out of this is lower public approval and a chance to negotiate with Mr. Obama
again before the next debt-limit deadline. If the Senate passes its compromise,
Mr. Boehner will have little choice other than to bring it to the floor and let
it pass with votes from either party. Mr. Obama will have to deliver enough
Democratic votes to pass it.
At
least that's better than getting the blame for whatever happens if Treasury
stops sending out Social Security checks in order to prioritize debt
repayments. The politics of that are little better than defaulting on debt.
Republicans can best help their cause now by getting this over with and moving
on to fight more intelligently another day.
And now, Sullivan,
also in a take-no-prisoners style:
To my
mind, it’s by far the biggest error Obama has made since taking office. To
bungle the rollout of his core domestic initiative is unforgivable. To have
known about it long before and kept quiet is inexcusable. To offer no real
explanation or to take any serious responsibility is governmental malpractice.
At some point, the president has to reassert control and explain what has gone
so horribly wrong and chart a course for correction. Those responsible must be
fired.
First, the goal of defunding, or rather not funding, Obamacare was achievable. Second, the shutdown was chosen and ordered by Obama and supported by Reid. Finally, the debt limit has been repeatedly violated. Obama and Reid have enjoyed compromises, only to disregard their promises. They are notorious for negotiating through coercion and acting in bad faith.
ReplyDeleteIt is Obama and Reid's choice to devalue capital and labor through trillion dollar deficits. It is Obama and Reid's choice to devalue human life by normalizing elective abortion and reducing a human life to a commodity.
That said, the final solution is evidence that the dynamic in government is far from dichotomous.
It's ironic that Obama promised to use a scalpel, but has only done hatchet jobs. Perhaps he only favors scalpels in "clinics". Reid appears to favor Obama's disposition. They complement each other perfectly.
ReplyDelete