It doesn’t happen very often that I find myself in agreement
with Naomi Wolf (or vice versa) but yesterday was one of those days.
Writing for the London Guardian Wolf laid out the downside
of porn. I have been blogging about the subject for years, and my views are
consonant with Wolf’s.
Obviously, pornography is here to say. No one favors banning
it. It is widely available and will remain so. In many ways, it ought to be
available to adults. Free people have a right to make a free choice about what they want to look at, even how they want to get aroused.
And yet, few people know it, but pornography is also
addictive. In excess, porn is not a harmless diversion. It effects behavior, in
particular, sexual behavior.
If anything, those who are overdosing on porn are
demonstrating why cultures have valued modesty. The absence of modesty, through
rampant shamelessness diminishes desire and fetishizes sexual encounters.
Obviously, there are larger issues here. How much has our
culture’s tendency to gender-bend contributed to the taste for porn? How much
are young people being duped into believing that they ought to be watching
porn, lest they not be sexually liberated? And how much of this addiction has
been produced by young people doing as they were told: following their bliss?
The culture’s messages, its edicts and precepts do not
always produce the desired results.
Wolf mixes anecdotal examples with more scientific research.
Among the anecdotal are these:
Couples
in their late teens tell me no one they know can have sex without porn playing
on a screen. A guidance counsellor at a private school asks where he can find
help for his students - many of whom are so addicted to online porn that the
obsession is affecting their schoolwork and social development.
When it comes to the science of pornoholism, as it is
called, things are fairly clear. Among the consequences of the overindulgence
in porn, as I have occasionally pointed out, is desensitization to erotic
stimuli.
Wolf explains:
Yet the
neuroscience of porn addiction is clear: watching porn causes sharp spikes in
the activation of dopamine, a neurotransmitter in the brain, which makes people
feel focused, confident and good.
The
trouble is that this short-term neurological arousal has long-term
consequences. Firstly, it can cause desensitisation to the same erotic simuli
that turned you on recently and, over the longer term, it can cause a greater
likelihood of sexual dysfunction.
The
user then craves more and more extreme pornography - violence and taboo images
activate the autonomic nervous system, which is involved with arousal -
in order to reach that same level of excitement.
This
acclimatisation and desensitisation explains why images that were seen as
fetishistic, taboo or violent ten years ago are now mainstream fare on porn
sites.
She continues:
A final
problem related to desensitisation is that men start to see their own partners
as less attractive, and less able to arouse them by ordinary sexual behaviour.
And, of
course, one woman can't provide the ever-changing novelty, that constantly
renewed boost to the brain that porn artificially delivers by a mouse click of
the mouse.
There
are other ways porn use can negatively affect female arousal. If a woman feels
uneasy about her partner's use of porn the stress of her resentment and anger
can affect her own ability to become aroused.
The good news is that getting over the pornoholism is not very difficult. It requires one to stop watching porn, or at least, cut down significantly on one’s exposure.
Wolf echoes points that are reasonably well known:
I
believe that with good health information, people can make more informed
choices about how, when, and if they want to use porn, and even better choices
about what kind of imagery they might seek out or avoid.
Those
who wish to end their addiction - like ending any addiction - can do so with
effort.
Men who
have done so - that is for whom we have data - report a great sense of
regaining psychological control, and heightened arousal with their wives or
girlfriends. Mostly they are relieved not to be at the mercy of something that
many of those who write to me feel they need - but don't especially
like.
Are we
'sexually liberated' if porn is taking over our thought processes and corroding
our ability to sustain meaningful relationships? I think we are less sexually
free.
A
powerful industry is manipulating us - and ruthlessly exploiting some
hard-wiring in the male brain - to turn us more and more into sexual and
emotional robots, only capable of achieving sexual fulfilment in a room with a
computer, alone.
Neither Wolf nor I want to moralize about pornography. And
yet, at a time when more and more young people are becoming addicted to it, a
word from the wise is surely in order… especially for those who know not what they are doing.
"Couples in their late teens tell me no one they know can have sex without porn playing on a screen"
ReplyDeleteWOW, really?
I've talked before how new technologies may be making us less mentally capable than previous generations, but I'm truly amazed to learn that a whole generation can't have intimate sex without a visual aid.
WOW!
The women in porn movies may well be better looking than my wife, but she's the one who's here turning me on.
ReplyDeleteI never got into it (despite many years of frustration) because I didn't want anything to remind me of what I was missing.
ReplyDelete