Sophie Robert has just posted a review of The Last Psychoanalyst on her Facebook
page. I include it here with my translation.
Those who have read the book or who have followed the debate
about autism in France—see my autism tag, at left—know how important Robert's work
has been in exposing the negative influence that French psychoanalysis has had
on the treatment of autism in that country.
Without further ado, here is Robert’s review, in the original French:
Pour
ceux qui sont en vacances, ou ceux qui viennent de rentrer, je vous conseille
la lecture "The last psychoanalyst" de Stuart Schneiderman : un essai
caustique, drôle et brillant sur l'église psychanalytique. L'auteur y raconte
comment ayant échoué à devenir une thérapie, la psychanalyse s'est
transformée en pseudo religion fondamentaliste. Un point de vue que je partage
entièrement. Il est d'autant plus intéressant qu'il est ici relaté de
l'intérieur : Stuart Schneiderman ayant été psychanalyste lacanien pendant les
années 70 au coeur même de l'Ecole de la Cause Freudienne (rebaptisée
savoureusement "Holly Freudian Church") avant de tourner casaque et
devenir coach à New York. Il a fréquenté les personnes qui m'ont poursuivie en
justice et tenté de censurer la problématique de l'autisme en France. Depuis
l'affaire du MUR, Stuart Schneiderman a pris ouvertement position pour les
parents des enfants autistes, dans plusieurs billets de son blog, notamment
"an army of mothers". Le dernier chapitre de son livre est consacré à
l'épopée du procès du MUR et la situation de l'autisme en France. Une saine
lecture qui mettra du baume au coeur des parents, et confortera les pros (les
bons) dans leurs baskets.
Vivement la traduction en français!
Vivement la traduction en français!
My translation:
For
those who are on vacation or who have just returned I recommend that you read
Stuart Schneiderman’s “The Last Psychoanalyst.” It is a caustic, drole,
brilliant essay on the psychoanalytic church. In his book the author recounts
how psychoanalysis, having failed to become a therapy transformed itself into a
fundamentalist pseudo-religion. I myself agree wholeheartedly. This is even
more interesting coming from someone who has been on the inside. Stuart Schneiderman
was a Lacanian psychoanalyst in the 70s in the heart of the School of the
Freudian Cause (which he deliciously rebaptizes the Holly (Wholly) Freudian
Church. He hung out with some of the people who were suing me and who were
trying to censure the truth about autism in France. During the affair around
[my film] Le Mur, or The Wall, Stuart Schneiderman openly sided with the
parents of autistic children, in several blog posts, especially his post on “an
army of mothers.” The last chapter of his book is dedicated to the trial around
my film, The Wall and the situation surrounding the treatment of autism in
France. A sane reading that will soothe the troubled hearts of parents and will
comfort the good professionals. We look forward to the French translation.
I searched for Sophie Robert and found her recent documentary, “The Wall or psychoanalysis put to the test for autism”. So this is what she's being sued about.
ReplyDeletehttp://www.supportthewall.org/2011/12/watch-the-wall-le-mur-by-sophie-robert/
------
This 52 minutes documentary is the result of 4 years of investigation among psychiatrists and psychoanalysis practitioners in France. It evidences the perception and the bad care of children with autism in France. As a reminder, most of these professionals are heads of pedo-psychiatric departments in major French hospitals.
Sophie Robert has met over 40 professionals in France and gathered more than 60 hours of dailies. Yet, three professionals interviewed in this documentary have sued Sophie Robert and request the documentary to be banned by the court.
------
And a review:
http://sfari.org/news-and-opinion/autism-in-the-arts/2012/documentary-review-le-mur-the-wall
Oh, and I missed your January blog about her and the lawsuit.
http://stuartschneiderman.blogspot.com/2014/01/the-liberation-of-sophie-robert.html
http://stuartschneiderman.blogspot.com/2012/05/french-psychoanalysts-unedited.html
I only saw the first 5 minutes of the doc, and can't judge the honesty of her editing, and knowing the likes of Michael Moore to twist around what people say, I can understand why people feel attacked when their own words are used against them.
The conflict itself opens the question of the psychology of conflict, and how best to open minds of others, especially those with "fundamentalist" beliefs.
If it wasn't for the politics of power, I'd say its best to debate facts, opinions and beliefs in private between honest truth seekers, but if it seems all the power exists on some "orthodox" view that has absolute political power to ignore facts to protect their power, then I can see publicity to show controversy and embarrassment maybe is the path to challenge, even if not to break the view of the faithful converts, but to convince the unconverted to ask more questions before "entering the faith"?