The 2016 election is in its infancy, but already Hillary
Clinton’s supporters are trying to create the impression that she is the most
competent and accomplished candidate imaginable.
Peter Wehner has offered the definitive response, on the
Commentary blog. I quote the salient portions, for your delectation:
What
exactly are her brilliant achievements? Is it HillaryCare, a substantive
disaster that led to a political disaster (the Republican sweep in the 1994
mid-term election)? The multiple ethical problems she’s encountered during her
years in politics? Here fierce opposition to the Petraeus-led surge in Iraq
long after it was obvious it was succeeding? Perhaps the Russian reset?
Referring to Bashar Assad, the genocidal dictator of Syria, as a “reformer“?
Or maybe her masterful handling of the Iranian Green Revolution, relations with
Egypt, Libya, Israel, the attack on the American diplomatic outpost in
Benghazi, Poland, the Czech Republic, the “pivot” to Asia and countless other
failures during the first Obama term?
What
exactly are her achievements
– her concrete, tangible, exceptional achievements – as First Lady, senator,
and secretary of state? They don’t exist. In fact, the things she has her
fingerprints on have, much more often than not, turned into disasters. The case
that her supporters put forward on her behalf — she has flown nearly a million
miles, visited more than 100 countries, read briefing book (!) and had tea with
local power brokers (!!) – highlights just how pathetic her achievements are.
The
media meme that Mrs. Clinton is “competent” – nay, “hyper-competent” – is
silly. During the quarter-century she’s been on the national stage, she has
proved herself to be an individual of extraordinary ambition, a conspiracy
theorist, ethically challenged, and a key figure in a brutal political machine.
She is also, pace The Economist and Chris
Cillizza, unusually inept. This judgment is not an opinion; it is based on a
reasonable assessment of her actual record. Including her briefing book reading
habits and tea times.
Every prospectus I read says "Past performance is no guarantee of future performance." Also, there's also "The struggle is not to the strong, nor the race to the swift, but that's the way to bet." She has a 40+ year record that shows consistency. I say that's a more-than-good reason to believe she will continue that record. If we give her the chance. I say, let's not.
ReplyDelete