All things considered Elizabeth Gilbert is an exceptionally
fine writer. She is one of the best. It’s not just about the mega-quantities of
books she has sold—in particular, her Eat
Pray Love—but about the quality of her prose. For example, check out her book: The Last American Man.
Agree or disagree with her point of view, accept or not accept her tendency to overshare, she is always
worth reading.
Now, she has just written an article for the Times about her
history of seducing men. At a time when we are obliged to live in a fictional world where women are victims of predatory males Gilbert draws back the curtain on
the mind and the activities of a woman who perfected the art of seducing men. It's a mix of femininity, empowerment and abuse.
It is not a pretty picture, but it is well worth showing.
When she was younger, Gilbert was addicted to seducing men.
It did not always end in a party, but it was always filled with drama. After
all, when you live your life as a fictional character you will surely attract
more than your share of drama.
She writes:
It
started with a boy I met at summer camp and ended with the man for whom I left
my first husband. In between, I careened from one intimate entanglement to the
next — dozens of them — without so much as a day off between romances. You
might have called me a serial monogamist, except that I was never exactly
monogamous. Relationships overlapped, and those overlaps were always marked by
exhausting theatricality: sobbing arguments, shaming confrontations, broken
hearts. Still, I kept doing it. I couldn’t not do it.
What was she looking for? It is not altogether clear:
I can’t
say that I was always looking for a better man. I often traded good men for bad
ones; character didn’t much matter to me. I wasn’t exactly seeking love,
either, regardless of what I might have claimed. I can’t even say it was the
sex. Sex was just the gateway drug for me, a portal to the much higher high I
was really after, which was seduction.
Was she seeking power and control? Many of today’s therapists
would say that she was. But she was also competing against other women,
competing for conquests. But, she was not acting as a huntress but as a
woman who was gathering up men as she went. Clearly, she was trying to prove
something, to assert something about herself… and she did not care who got hurt
in the process.
Gilbert concludes correctly that seduction, as she practiced
it, was thievery and coercion, taking something on false premises, conning a
man by convincing him that she really wanted him, and using him for her own
psychological purposes:
Seduction
is the art of coercing somebody to desire you, of orchestrating somebody else’s
longings to suit your own hungry agenda. Seduction was never a casual sport for
me; it was more like a heist, adrenalizing and urgent. I would plan the heist
for months, scouting out the target, looking for unguarded entries. Then I
would break into his deepest vault, steal all his emotional currency and spend
it on myself.
One is surprised to see this much raw honesty. In our
liberated time, we imagine that women are perfect and that men are fatally
flawed. The notion that a woman might use men without any regard for their
feelings, strikes a truthful, but discordant note.
Gilbert did not care about whether the man she set her
sights on had a girlfriend or was otherwise attached. She had no moral scruples
about hurting other women.
How did she do it? She explains that her secret was, being
different:
If the
man was already involved in a committed relationship, I knew that I didn’t need
to be prettier or better than his existing girlfriend; I just needed to be
different. (The novel doesn’t always win out over the familiar, mind you, but
it often does.) The trick was to study the other woman and to become her
opposite, thereby positioning myself to this man as a sparkling alternative to
his regular life.
She was looking to invade their minds, to watch them obsess
about her, to see them throw everything to the winds for her:
That’s
what I was after: the telekinesis-like sensation of steadily dragging
somebody’s fullest attention toward me and only me. My guilt about the other
woman was no match for the intoxicating knowledge that — somewhere on the other
side of town — somebody couldn’t sleep that night because he was thinking about
me. If he needed to sneak out of his house after midnight in order to call,
better still. That was power, but it was also affirmation. I was someone’s
irresistible treasure. I loved that sensation, and I needed it, not sometimes,
not even often, but always.
Unfortunately for Gilbert, the love she elicited and even
stole did not last very long. Besides, being a woman she was not looking for
extra notches on her bedpost. She was looking for true love, no matter the cost. She did not seem to realize that her style of
seduction would preclude anything resembling a durable relationship:
But
over time (and it wouldn’t take long), his unquenchable infatuation for me
would fade, as his attention returned to everyday matters. This always left me
feeling abandoned and invisible; love that could be quenched was not nearly
enough love for me. As soon as I could, then, I would start seducing somebody
else, by turning myself into an entirely different woman, in order to attract
an entirely different man. These episodes of shape-shifting cost me dearly. I
would lose weight, sleep, dignity, clarity. As anyone who has ever watched a
werewolf movie knows, transmutation is excruciating and terrifying, but once
that process has been set into motion — once you have glimpsed that full moon —
it cannot be reversed. I could endure these painful episodes only by assuring
myself: ‘‘This is the last time. This guy is the one.’’
For Gilbert, marriage was not a cure. Her first marriage did
not cause her to change her ways:
In my
mid-20s, I married, but not even matrimony slowed me down. Predictably, I grew
restless and lonely. Soon enough I seduced someone new; the marriage collapsed.
But it was worse than just that. Before my divorce agreement was even signed, I
was already breaking up with the guy I had broken up my marriage for. You know
you’ve got intimacy issues when, in the space of a few short months, you find
yourself visiting two completely different couples’ counselors, with two
completely different men on your arm, in order to talk about two completely
different emotional firestorms. Trying to keep all my various story lines
straight (Whom am I angry at, again? Who is angry at me now? Whose office is
this?) made my hands shake and my mind splinter.
At times Gilbert thought that she was a hopeless romantic.
At other times she saw herself as a feminist heroine. Eventually she began to
feel ashamed:
Tinkering
with other people’s most vulnerable emotions didn’t make me a romantic; it just
made me a swindler. Lying and cheating didn’t make me brazen; it just made me a
needy coward. Stealing other women’s boyfriends didn’t make me a revolutionary
feminist; it just made me a menace. I hated that it took me almost 20 years to
realize this. There are 16-year-old kids who know better than to behave this
way. It felt shameful. But once I got it, I really got it: There is no way to
stop a destructive behavior, except to stop.
How did she break the spell? She credits a good therapist
with helping her to get her bearings. And, six months of abstinence helped out.
But the decisive change occurred when, one day, she met a new man, was thrilled
to be invited back to his apartment, and demurred:
Then
one afternoon I ran into a guy I liked. We went for a long walk in the park.
Flirted. Laughed. It was sweet. Eventually he said, ‘‘Would you like to come
back to my apartment with me?’’
Yes! My
God, how I wanted to unwrap this man like a Christmas present!
But I
also didn’t want to: I was only beginning to pull myself together, and I feared
unraveling.
Uncertain,
I tried something radically new. I said, ‘‘Do you mind if I take a moment to
think about this?’’
After some reflection, Gilbert told the man that she was not
ready to go any further.
What worked for her? Two things stand out: first, the shame
she felt when she took a step back and looked at herself… judgmentally. That
shame gave her a choice… to accept or not to accept the erotic interest that she
had cultivated. Second, she made a real world decision that ran counter to her
habit and she acted on it. Thus, she took a step toward breaking the habit and
overcoming her desires.
Lucky me; I get to say it: Imagine if this had been written by a man. The Times (which Times, Stuart?) would either not have printed it, or would have assailed the writer without mercy.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDeleteSounds like someone needs to be the center of the universe. You think you'd run away from this woman -- fast -- but how would you know? She's pretty clear that she worked hard at it in a cold, calculating way. That's tough to shake. I like the last paragraph on choices. People like to psychoanalyze, but the truth about this kind of thing is that you have to have clear, defined boundaries of what is acceptable or not acceptable when meeting someone like Gilbert. A friend gave me a synopsis of "Eat, Pray, Love" once, and it sounded incredibly narcissistic and bohemian, as she was a prisoner of her own emotions. She may be a great writer, but the content is actually horrifying.
ReplyDeleteThis is why I don't get to exercised by cheating. Women's worse enemies are other women just like this person. Always surprises me when women seem to forget that it takes two people, the other almost always being another woman, to cheat. Women would have their own fantasies, but would deny those fantasies to men. This woman has at least matured enough to see the damage she has done and begun to recognize the ideas that gave license to her prior actions.
ReplyDeleteHow many of us have not seen this example in high school, even before, college, the military, the work place, et al? Sex is a power that most women are very cognizant of very early on in their lives. I am truly amazed that anyone would find this abnormal. I have both daughters and granddaughters and in watching them grow up seeing how quickly they understand the sexual dynamic. Far quicker than most boys and young men do.
We are all fallible human beings that make a lot of mistakes and as a father I learned that far to early. The most we can hope for is that we learn from our mistakes. In fact it should not take long to understand what drives much of these kinds of actions. Have we not created a condition for young women that almost compels them to be a "slut?" If we are teaching our young women and men that we are alike in all things are we not implying that in order to be normal we should have the same attitudes towards sex despite the fact that the burdens fall unequally? Still amazes me that we seem to have the capability to ignore what happens around us.
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteHer honesty is impressive, like:
ReplyDelete"Tinkering with other people’s most vulnerable emotions didn’t make me a romantic; it just made me a swindler. Lying and cheating didn’t make me brazen; it just made me a needy coward. Stealing other women’s boyfriends didn’t make me a revolutionary feminist; it just made me a menace. I hated that it took me almost 20 years to realize this. There are 16-year-old kids who know better than to behave this way. It felt shameful. But once I got it, I really got it: There is no way to stop a destructive behavior, except to stop."
And she gave us her secret, so now we can all practice this on our own addictions.
I might interpret "stop" to mean "get thee to a nunnery" in her case, but I guess she's not given up on love yet, so the game is still on, just raised a notch.
And now anyone who doesn't believe her sincere confession deserves whatever they get. She's off the hook, at least to her future victims.
Is it disrespectful in polite conversation to say "Hey remember the time you seduced your best friend's husband?" or something like that every time you see her having too much fun at a dinner party? Or are her friends disallowed from reminding her of what she said yesterday and forgot today?
I'm sincerely curious how real someone's shame really is, unless you can dig it deep enough to see them cry at least once over hurting someone.
re: Elizabeth Gilbert is the author of the memoir ‘‘Eat, Pray, Love.’’ Her new book, ‘‘Big Magic: Creative Living Beyond Fear,’’ will be published by Riverhead Books in September.
ReplyDeleteHer confession sounds a bit less impressive seeing it as a callout for her new book.
Creative living beyond fear? Isn't that what her entire seduction game was about?