Political alliances in the Middle East are shifting. As
relations cool between Israel and America, relations between Israel and two of
its most important Arab neighbors continue to improve.
While President Obama is trying to strike a nuclear arms deal with Iran on Iran’s
terms, Saudi Arabia and Egypt have been moving toward something of a
rapprochement with Israel.
We know that unofficial Saudi diplomats have appeared in
public meetings with unofficial representatives of the Israeli government.
Evidently, this was meant to signal that friendly diplomatic
contacts are taking place. See my post of June 6, 2015.
More recently the Wall Street Journal reported:
Now,
however, the Saudis are finding themselves in an unusual and somewhat
uncomfortable position of, if not empathizing with Israel, at least relating to
it. Years of sectarian carnage in Syria and Iraq have turned public opinion in
Saudi Arabia and many other Arab countries solidly against Iran and against its
most powerful Arab ally, the Shiite Hezbollah militia in Lebanon.
These
days, official government spokesmen in the Saudi capital Riyadh frequently draw
a parallel between the pro-Iranian Houthi militia that Saudi Arabia is fighting in Yemen and Hezbollah. They
say one Saudi objective in the war is to prevent the Houthis in Yemen from
establishing a state-within-a-state like the one Hezbollah has carved out in
southern Lebanon.
Obviously, Iran’s incursions from Iraq to Syria to Yemen have pushed the Saudis to start talking with the
Israelis. More significantly, the American government seems to be
going out of its way not to offend the Iranians. That involves allowing the
Iranians to develop a nuclear weapon and removing the economic sanctions that are
currently hurting it:
Saudi
Arabia—like Israel—is also concerned by Tehran’s pending nuclear deal with the U.S. and five other world powers.
Fearing that the agreement, and the accompanying lifting of economic sanctions,
would embolden Iran to expand its regional sway, some Saudis even hope—not so
secretly—that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu would use his
country’s air force to destroy Iran’s nuclear installations.
“Israel
is an enemy because of its origin, but isn’t an enemy because of its
actions—while Iran is an enemy because of its actions, not because of its
origin,” said Abdullah al Shammari, a Riyadh academic who served as a
senior Saudi diplomat.
“This
means that Iran is more of a threat. If I were a Saudi decision maker, I would
not hesitate for a second to coordinate with Israel against Iran’s nuclear
program.”
Officially, the nations are enemies. And yet, we read this:
“Saudi
Arabia would like Israel to be part of the Middle East, as a state in the
Middle East. We can’t take it out, and we can use their technology while they
can use our money,” said retired Saudi Maj. Gen. Anwar Eshqi, chairman
of the Middle East Center for Strategic and Legal Studies in the Saudi city of
Jeddah.
The Saudis, however, openly criticize Israel for failing in
2006 to eliminate Hezbollah from Lebanon.
The relationship between President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi’s
Egypt and Israel is becoming warmer. What with Egypt’s president having declared
war on the Muslim Brotherhood and Hamas, the ties have been
strengthening. Apparently, the two nations share intelligence about the
terrorist threat in the Sinai and Gaza.
Keep in mind that Egypt and Saudi Arabia are close allies
and that the Saudis were enraged at the way the Obama administration, through
Secretary of State Clinton, discarded their friend Hosni Mubarak in favor of
Mohamed Morsi, leader of the Muslim Brotherhood.
Debkafile (an Israeli intelligence source) reports the recent appointment of a new Egyptian ambassador to Israel:
"President
Abdel Fattah al-Sisi issued a republican decree appointing new diplomats abroad
which included ... Ambassador Hazem Khairat ... as Egyptian ambassador to Tel
Aviv," state news agency MENA reported on Sunday. Prime Minister Binyamin
Netanyahu made the announcement at a joint news conference with French Foreign
Minister Laurent Fabius in Jerusalem, calling it “an important piece of news.”
The last ambassador was recalled by ousted President Mohamed Morsi over
Israel's 2012 operation against Hamas in the Gaza Strip.
Ambassador Khairat’s last two postings were as Egypt’s former permanent representative to the Arab League, and then as ambassador to Chile. Sources in Cairo say he will take up his post in September. His appointment is another mark of the cordial relations which President Sisi and PM Netanyahu have maintained for some time, often at the clandestine level.
Interestingly, Netanyahu made the announcement in the
presence of the French Foreign Minister, Laurent Fabius. Even though Fabius works
for the socialist president Francois Hollande, he is evidently a far more
skilled diplomat than either of his two American counterparts.
Warming relations between the nations were further reflected
in a program that has been running on Egyptian television during Ramadan.
The New York Times reports on it:
The
scene is Cairo’s Jewish Quarter in 1948, and Laila Haroun has news for her
parents. Her brother, Moussa, has left to settle in the new state of Israel in
spite of the war with Egypt and its Arab
allies.
“Your
son is a traitor,” Laila shouts across their elegant living room. “You gave
birth to him as an Egyptian Jew, not an Israeli Jew, which he never will be!”
Her
revelation sets up the central conflict in this year’s most talked-about
Egyptian television series, “The Jewish Quarter,” which has astonished
Egyptians with its sympathetic treatment of Egypt’s Jews and its
depiction of their fierce anti-Zionism.
The
villains in the piece are the Islamists of the Muslim Brotherhood,
not the Jews, and Laila’s love interest is a Muslim military officer celebrated
as a hero in the Jewish community. The military’s real-life role in expelling
Egypt’s Jews under President Gamal Abdel Nasser is omitted completely.
The Times continues:
It is a
stark turn from the overt anti-Semitism that has dominated Egyptian television
for decades. The Israeli Embassy in Cairo commended the first episodes,
commenting on an embassy-run Facebook page that for the first time, “it shows
Jews in their real human state, as a human being before anything, and we bless
this.”
But
after four years of tumult — including after the Arab Spring revolution that
promised to end Egypt’s military-backed autocracy, and a new military takeover
two years ago that removed an Islamist president — the series is stirring
fierce debate here about both Jews and Egypt. In addition to raising questions
about the status of Jews, discussion of the series has become a contest among
cosmopolitan, nationalistic and religious visions of Egyptian identity.
How does the series depict the Muslim Brotherhood?
Hassan
el-Banna, the founder of the Muslim Brotherhood, is portrayed as a laughable
stooge. “The war is not only in Palestine, but jihad here is no
less than jihad there,” he declares in the series, dipping into a notorious
conspiracy theory about a popular Western beverage: “For this reason, I am
demanding that Coca-Cola be considered a forbidden drink, and for a postage
stamp with the picture of Al Aqsa Mosque to be sold for only 1 piaster, to be
bought by Egyptians for the sake of Palestine.”
Unsurprisingly, the show is not as tolerant as one would
like. Still, considering the fact that Egyptians (and many other Middle Eastern
Arabs) have for decades been fed a steady diet of anti-Semitic propaganda, it
is surely a step in the right direction:
Still,
Joel Beinin, a historian at Stanford who has written about Egyptian Jews of the
period, said the series “is more consistent with the facts than almost anything
else that has appeared in Egyptian mass media in recent decades.”
And also:
Lucette
Lagnado, an Egyptian-born Jew whose memoir, “The Man in the White Sharkskin
Suit,” describes her family’s forced flight from Cairo, argued that the
popularity of the series reflected a desire to return to the more harmonious
ethos of that earlier era.
I suspect NYT reviewers, if they review this, will be horrified.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDelete