What would we do without the Daily Mail?
Today, it reports on research from Tufts University, certainly
a reputable institution, that demonstrates, after years of anti-cholesterol
hysteria, that butter is not going to make you sick.
The story speaks for itself:
Butter
is not bad for us and does not raise the risk of heart disease, a major study
has found.
Scientists
discovered eating one tablespoon of butter a day had little impact on overall
mortality, no significant link with cardiovascular disease and strokes – and
could even have a small effect in reducing the risk of diabetes.
The
robust research - one of the largest meta-studies to be carried out on the
health effects of butter - adds weight to growing calls for the end of the
'demonising' of the dairy product and other saturated fats.
It
follows reports earlier this month that the Government is reconsidering its
advice to restrict saturated fat intake to limit the risk of heart disease,
after two recent studies found no link.
In the latest research, scientists from Tufts University in Boston analysed the results of nine studies published since 2005 from 15 countries, including the US, UK and Europe.
Results
were based on nearly 640,000 adults with an average age of between 44 and 71
years old, tracked over a combined total of 6.5 million years.
In
total, they studies included more than 28,000 deaths, nearly 10,000 cases of
cardiovascular diseases and nearly 24,000 cases of diabetes.
By combining and standardising the results, researchers found a daily serving
of butter – 14g or roughly one tablespoon – was associated with a 1 per cent
higher risk of death.
Butter
consumption had 'no significant association' with any type of cardiovascular
disease, including coronary heart disease and stroke.
A
smaller sample of results indicated a daily serving of butter was associated
with a 4 per cent lower risk of type 2 diabetes - although researchers said
this needed further investigation.
The paper
said: 'Together, these findings suggest relatively small or neutral
associations of butter consumption with long-term health… A major focus on
eating more or less butter, by itself, may not be linked to large differences
in mortality, cardiovascular disease or diabetes.
'In
sum, our findings do not support a need for major emphasis in dietary
guidelines on butter consumption, in comparison to other better established
dietary priorities.
Yes, but who wants to have only one tablespoon of butter per day? If a little is good for you, a lot must be better! Kind of like wine...
ReplyDeleteOn the serious side, it is interesting how many of these taboo foodstuffs -- such as meat, butter, eggs and salt -- are proven to be wrong when placed under greater scrutiny, at long last. One of the few "good" taboos in recent years that I find sensible is trans fat... that stuff is truly cardiovascularly destructive. Taft said, I don't need Michael Bloomberg, et al, hectoring me about it.
Can you imagine eating a meat with a nutritional, health or food activist? Humorless, joyless.
It would seem Michael Pollan's "In Defense of Food" is the most apt prescription. It's thoughtful, sensible and balanced.
The people who gave us the USDA Food Pyramid should be ashamed of themselves.
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDelete