Now is the summer of our discontent, made more infernal by
the son of Cuomo.
Such is life in New York this summer, as the subway system
continues to malfunction and as Penn Station, a major transportation hub is
falling apart.
Were you to read the press you would come away with the
impression that it’s all an act of God, that it had nothing to do with human
error or even human malfeasance.
The Wall Street Journal editorial page examined the problem
and discovered, lo and behold, that the fault lay with politicians and
bureaucrats, labor unions and lawyers.
Who knew?
The Journal describes the breakdown of a goodly part of New
York’s public transportation system:
Hundreds
of trains that run through New York City will be delayed or diverted this
summer so Amtrak can make long overdue track repairs at Penn Station, the
busiest rail hub in North America. Derailments are now common, and New York’s
subways are also breaking down. The mess is a mere portent of the misery that
commuters will experience when the 107-year-old tunnel under the Hudson River,
which was badly damaged by Hurricane Sandy in 2012, undergoes repairs.
How did we get to this point? The Journal explains:
The
answer is that modern progressives prefer doling out transfer payments to
voters and public workers rather than make long-term investments in subway
cars, tunnels and bridges. And even when they do build something, they pile on
the costs to pay off their other political constituencies.
Why repair the system when you can buy votes by funneling
money to the workers and their union bosses.
Anyway, the Journal continues to show the influence of
environmentalists and lawyers in working out the Hudson tunnel retrofit:
Take
the Hudson tunnel retrofit, which the Federal Railroad Administration’s (FRA)
draft environmental impact statement last week pegged at $13 billion, up from
$7.7 billion from just last year. Cost drivers include measures to minimize
traffic delays, but also defensive contracting to avoid lawsuits. The FRA
proposes blocking ugly views of construction with barricades and fencing that are
“clad with aesthetically attractive or artistically enhanced fabric.”
Marsh-pennywort plants in the Meadowlands would be transplanted to protected
areas.
To be clear, for those who want to know where the money is
going, the answer resides in increased labor costs:
Since
2005 the MTA’s labor costs—which account for 60% of expenses—have swelled by
80%. Pension and health costs have doubled. In January the agency bumped pay by
an additional 5% over the next two years, threw in a $500 bonus and agreed to
hire 100 workers to remodel worker facilities.
It makes you long for the joys of the Paris Metro. That city
might be a socialist paradise, but at least the subways run, cleanly and efficiently. If Paris is a socialist city, what does that say about New York. No wonder Donald Trump wanted to get out of town.
In New York, no one cares about fixing the system:
With
all the money that government spends on labor and marsh-pennyworts, it’s no
surprise that capital investment has been neglected. The MTA’s rolling stock
hasn’t been replaced for 20 to 30 years since Mayors Ed Koch and Rudy Giuliani
prioritized service improvements. The MTA still uses block signals from the
1930s, which explains why so many are malfunctioning and causing delays. While
the current capital plan allocates $2.8 billion to modernize the signal system,
the upgrade won’t be finished for half a century.
Think about that, fifty years to modernize the signal
system. That's what happens when we put politicians and bureaucrats in charge:
Progressives
say we don’t spend enough on public works, but dedicated taxes for New York’s
MTA have doubled over the last decade. Washington is spending 35% more on
public transit than a decade ago. Don’t forget the $11 billion that the
Northeast got from Hurricane Sandy relief for transportation, which should have
covered the cost for signal repairs. But politicians instead prioritized
spending $15.9 billion for “community development” and billions more in pork.
As taxes rise most of the money goes to buying votes rather than upgrades that
will be finished on some other politician’s watch.
One thing we know for certain. The fault does not lie with the Tea Party. If it did, you would be hearing no end of recriminations against right wing extremists and how they are destroying our cities. And Andrew Cuomo has dreams of running for president.
Have a nice day!
[Addendum: I should have put this link in the body of the text, so with a mea culpa, here's a story from the Daily News on yesterday's subway disaster, burning trash that shut down large parts of the system: Link here. How do you spell-- third world?]
[Addendum: I should have put this link in the body of the text, so with a mea culpa, here's a story from the Daily News on yesterday's subway disaster, burning trash that shut down large parts of the system: Link here. How do you spell-- third world?]
My career-spanning maxim has been "data always [ahem] trumps theory". It's a rewording of the Feynman Principle (ie, "It doesn't matter how beautiful your theory is...[etc]"), and axiomatic to an objective understanding of reality since Roger Bacon, OFM.
ReplyDeleteMy understanding of Progressive theory is generally pretty good (limited, naturally, by its inherent incoherence). Basically, Progressive theory describes what has been called by some a Shining Path, a Sendero Luminoso, to material paradise and pristine equalitarianism.
Sadly, the data from NYC, Detroit, Chicago, Oakland, Illinois, Connecticut, Venezuela, Greece, etc trump the theory.
But there's a bright side (since I don't live in any of those places). Progressive theory is much like a wedding cake designed by Uncle Fester; amusing in its bizarre arabesques and flourishes, but basically inedible. The fun part comes, not from consuming the product, but from yanking the nipple rings of the bakers.
I delight (from afar) in tbe artisanal urinary aromatherapy, filth, violence, and frottage offered to the sweltering, immobile customers of the MTA, declared in a "state of emergency" by Mr Cuomo, and benignly administered by Mr de Blasio.
It is, after all, what the good, non-deplorable, high-information citizens of NYC voted for.
Stuart - A comment about the Paris metro - in the 80s they still had first and second class metro cars.
ReplyDeleteI saw it and rode in em.
Why are blue cities such pits of corruption and misspending? (h/t, Instapundit).
ReplyDeleteLived in NYC for 5+ years.
ReplyDeleteVisit Singapore annually.
No public transport comparisons possible.
New Yorkers ought to be legendary for their provincialism.
-shoe
PS - TW should get Stuart's blog award today for this one:
"But there's a bright side (since I don't live in any of those places). Progressive theory is much like a wedding cake designed by Uncle Fester; amusing in its bizarre arabesques and flourishes, but basically inedible. The fun part comes, not from consuming the product, but from yanking the nipple rings of the bakers."
Does anybody in NYT have the knowledge and enough smarts to run a trolley line? Anyone?
ReplyDeleteBuehller??