Yesterday, retired lawyer Francis Menton (via Maggie's Farm) addressed the
question of why there are so few women litigators. Since the feministically correct view has it that the firms themselves are preventing women
from becoming great litigators, Menton emphasizes the obvious point: litigators
are chosen by clients, not by law firms. Only the most
deranged client would bypass a superior woman litigator in favor of an inferior male litigator.
As for the deeper meaning of it all, it happens, as you
know, that it's all because of motherhood. Or better, women’s exercise of their freedom
to choose.
Menton recounts his own experience trying to persuade female
associates with children to return to litigation:
For
myself, I don't claim to have perfect knowledge of all the causes of
"gender disparity" in the legal profession. However, as a long
time law firm partner, I did have the experience of working with many dozens of
female associates (as well as an equivalent number of male
associates) over the course of three decades. It would have been
hard not to notice the higher attrition rate among women over the years from
the higher-pressure and longer-hour areas of the practice, of which litigation
is one. More than anything else, this attrition for women was associated
with having children. I have spent many, many fruitless hours in my life
trying hopelessly to convince highly talented female associates that they
really wanted to come back from maternity leave to the 12 hour days and
over-the-weekend injunction motions and four weeks on trial in Kansas and leave
their little kids at home with a babysitter. It never worked once.
The number of women with children who stick with the high-end litigation
business for a long term career is very few. What I don't understand is
why anybody feels guilty about that or thinks that it is important to
change.
If women’s free choices explain the disparity, this suggests
that those who believe that we must erase the disparity at any cost want to
force women to do something that they do not want to do. The implications of
that predicate are obvious and obviously appalling.
Feminist thinking: They know best for ALL women. Especially those suffering from "false consciousness".
ReplyDelete