This morning Bret Stephens has some reflections on language.
In part, he comments on Donald Trump’s use of language, but the meat of his
column concerns the Obama administration’s systematic lies about Islamic
terrorism.
Stephens begins by showing the extent that the Obama
administration contorted language in order to lie about Islam and its
relation to terrorism:
….
Islamist terrorism, or what former Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano
used to call “man-caused disasters” in order to “move away from the politics of
fear,” as she explained in a 2009 Der Spiegel interview.
Napolitano’s
“man-caused disasters” didn’t survive the political laugh test, but the
fantastically elastic phrase “violent extremism” did. President Obama’s broad
reluctance to use variants of the word “Islam” in proximity to “terrorism”
became one of the staples of his presidency. The group that calls itself
“Islamic State” was always and adamantly “ISIL” to him.
Remember Omar Mateen, who perpetrated the mass murder of 49
people at a gay nightclub. Might that count as homophobia? Not, to the Obama
administration:
After
Omar Mateen explicitly declared his fealty to the Islamic State in a 911 call
and massacred 49 people at Orlando’s Pulse nightclub in June 2016, Obama
acknowledged the blood bath as “an act of terror” but stressed that the
“precise motivations of the killer” remained unknown.
As for ideologically motivated students driving crowds into
crowds, it happened when Obama was president, too:
Last
November, a Somali student at Ohio State University rammed a car into a crowd
of students and then began attacking them with a butcher knife before being
shot dead. “If we increase our suspicion of people who practice a particular
religion, we’re more likely to contribute to acts of violence than we are to
prevent them,” said the White House spokesman Josh Earnest. As for Obama, I can
find no record of him ever speaking publicly about the attack, which was so
reminiscent of what happened Saturday in Charlottesville.
Of course, the administration tried to hand over Egypt to
the Muslim Brotherhood. They sent Secretary of State Hillary to Cairo to be the first
foreign leader to congratulate Brotherhood president Mohamed Morsi. And yet,
the Brotherhood is an international terrorist organization, declared as such by
places like the United Arab Emirates.
For the Obama administration, not so much:
The
Muslim Brotherhood — whose credo includes the words “jihad is our way; dying in
the way of Allah is our highest hope” — was, according to the former director
of national intelligence James Clapper, “a very heterogeneous group, largely
secular, which has eschewed violence and has decried Al Qaeda.”
The
administration walked back the “largely secular” line, but remained equivocal
about what is arguably the largest hate group in the world.
As for the administration sell-out to Iran, Obama saw it as
reparations for the dastardly way the American government overthrew the
Mossadegh government in 1953:
It also
tended to equivocate when it came to apportioning historical blame for United
States conflicts with militant adversaries. If Iran had taken Americans hostage
and killed hundreds of our soldiers, well, as Obama often noted,
hadn’t we helped overthrow the Mossadegh government back in 1953?
There's something very strange about all this. The Obama Democrats seem ashamed of America and our history. It's as though everything comes down to one simple, complete sentence: "America sucks." More of Rev. Jeremiah Wright's "chickens coming home to roost," I suppose.
ReplyDeleteAlso, shooting soldiers at Ft. Bliss was just "workplace violence."
ReplyDelete