Speaking of delicate sensibilities. Several women have now
accused world renowned artist Chuck Close of asking them to
disrobe in order to model in the nude. For those who do not know Close is a 77
year old quadriplegic. You can imagine how threatened these women felt. If you
don’t, you need to have your empathy meter readjusted.
The New York Times has the story:
Two
women recently told The New York Times that Mr. Close had asked them to model
naked for him, requests that made them feel exploited and uncomfortable. And on
Tuesday, HuffPost published similar accounts from women, including one who
described stripping in front of Mr. Close. HuffPost reported he then moved
toward her in his wheelchair “so that his head was inches away from her
vagina,” and said it “looks delicious.”
Is Chuck Close a sexual predator? Were his remarks in good taste, so to speak? Do you think that this woman will every recover? The Times allows Close to
defend himself:
In an
interview on Wednesday, Mr. Close, 77, denied making this comment but
acknowledged that he has spoken to women candidly and even crudely about their
body parts. He said he did so in the interests of evaluating them as possible
subjects, and he said he apologized if he had made women feel uncomfortable. He
said he had brought women to his studio for artistic reasons, and generally
paid them to audition for photographs,
since he occasionally produces daguerreotype nudes, several of which were
featured in a 2014 survey at his gallery, Pace.
Close continued:
“I’m
inviting them to my studio to audition. I don’t have a camera there, so I have
to see their bodies — it’s a very expensive process,” Mr. Close said. “I’ve
never had a complaint in 50 years, not one.”
“Last
time I looked, discomfort was not a major offense,” he added. “I never reduced
anyone to tears, no one ever ran out of the place. If I embarrassed anyone or
made them feel uncomfortable, I am truly sorry, I didn’t mean to. I acknowledge
having a dirty mouth, but we’re all adults.”
According to the punctilious and oh-so sanctimonious New
York Times, Close had violated an unwritten code of conduct. No one had ever
heard of this code of conduct before, but if you are the New York Times, what
difference does it make?
Modeling
nude for artists is an age-old tradition. But there is an unofficial code of
conduct associated with painting someone nude that includes informing models in
advance that they would be expected to undress; making sure the subject is
comfortable posing unclothed; refraining from commenting on a model’s body;
keeping the atmosphere professional and avoiding personal questions.
Seriously, guys. What is wrong with you? Do you really think
that Picasso—to take a random example—observed this code of conduct? Do you
know anything about Picasso or art history? Perhaps it's time to grow up.
Apparently, Close spoke inappropriately about the women’s
naked bodies. If this does not sound like a thought crime, I do not know what
does:
According
to the women who spoke to The Times and HuffPost,
Mr. Close violated this code, making inappropriate comments about their bodies,
probing into their private lives and holding out the prospect of their being
painted by a venerated artist to lure them to his studio, with what seemed to
them no real artistic intent or result.
How are these women or the New York Times to know what the
artist’s intentions were? Do you really believe that a quadriplegic artist who
makes some comments about a woman’s naked body is therefore not taking them
seriously as potential models?
One woman, an artist herself, was seriously disappointed to
discover that when Close invited her to his studio to pose, he wanted her to
undress. Apparently, she thought that he saw her as a fellow artist. He did
not:
Another
artist, Delia Brown, told The Times she met Mr. Close at a dinner party in the
Hamptons in 2005, and he said he was a fan of her work and asked her to come
pose for a portrait in his studio. “I was over the moon excited because having
your portrait done as an artist by Chuck Close is tantamount to being
canonized,” Ms. Brown said.
She
shared the news with a prominent collector of her work, Glenn Fuhrman, who was
also present at the dinner, hosted by Mickey Straus, then the longtime chairman
of Guild Hall in East Hampton, and his wife, Leila. “He was excited for me,”
Ms. Brown said of Mr. Fuhrman.
But
when she called Mr. Close the next day, as he’d requested, the artist said she
needed to agree to model topless.
“My
heart sank,” Ms. Brown said. “I thought, ‘That’s not how he photographs
artists.’ I immediately felt a little bit insulted.”
She
told Mr. Close she had to think about it and ultimately decided against it. “I
came to the conclusion that I was not being photographed as an artist but as a
woman,” she said. “I said, ‘I hope I can still come to your studio.’” But when
she called a few weeks later to arrange that visit, Ms. Brown said, Mr. Close
“acted like he did not know me.”
How about that: he saw her, not as an artist, but as a
woman. Could it be that she thought more of her work than she should have? At little too much inflated self-esteem?
Anyway, Brown’s Wikipedia page describes her work in
pseudo-intellectual radical leftist terms:
Brown's
work is primarily engaged in exploring desire as an individuated experience
that connects the personal to the collective unconscious, often mediated
through advertising and commercial culture. Referencing early bourgeois
painting genres, she paints herself and friends enacting their own fantasies of
being part of the leisure class, with props from snacks and beverages to
million-dollar artworks functioning as important accessories in the assumption
of privilege.
You decide:
Brown's work is looks like bullshit smeared on canvas, but she's a bangable chick, within certain given limits and perhaps a paper bag. So I give Chuck a pass here.
ReplyDeleteAppears to me that he can't touch her (how DOES he paint?), so she's physically safe. Mentally safe would seem to be her problem.
ReplyDeleteThe Red Pill sector has been predicting this for sometime now. #MeToo is beyond anything like the normal definition of harrasment and well on their way to the goals of allowing women to openly engage in hypergamous conduct and ensuring they are only approached by men they consider attractive.
ReplyDeleteHELLO ! A powerful man using that power to take advantage of women - doesn't that sound familiar ?
ReplyDeleteI have been a working artist for over 35 years . I still draw from nude models - weekly . NEVER have I had my " head was inches away a model's vagina,” and said it “looks delicious.” That is predatory behavior. And for everyone who has never drawn from the model - the artist is NEVER inches away - WTF?
The man in a wheelchair can and did cross the line, just like Harvey.
"Predatory quadriplegic" is, in my opinion, an oxymoron.
ReplyDelete:-D
no, not "just like Harvey". Harvey raped several women and abused others for decades. Chuck is a creep and if some boyfriend or husband wanted to fix his wagon, I'd lend him the wrench, what he did was magnitudes less than what Harvey did.
ReplyDeleteIf women are coming forward to say "He hurt my feelings", they got what they wanted - an apology. If they are coming forward to warn women of his lack of professionalism, then they also got what they wanted. His reputation as a sexual being with a sense of humor is now exposed.
ReplyDeleteSo mission accomplished in all respects I think.
"Brown's work is primarily engaged in exploring desire as an individuated experience that connects the personal to the collective unconscious, often mediated through advertising and commercial culture. Referencing early bourgeois painting genres, she paints herself and friends enacting their own fantasies of being part of the leisure class, with props from snacks and beverages to million-dollar artworks functioning as important accessories in the assumption of privilege."
ReplyDeleteThat's some mighty big words to say nothing.
"(like the hoped for) ....million-dollar artworks functioning as important accessories in the assumption of privilege."
ReplyDeleteWould that (ironically?) be something like being deified as"an Artist(God)" via a publicized portrait by Chuck Close??
Forget the Casting Couch...needs a Fainting Couch.
What does it say about the woman's lack of judgement that she hoped Close would make an historic icon out of her?
These Foucault/Derrida fanboys & girls have long ago flown up their own fundaments.
-shoe
When you're asked to pose nude, you can't be aghast when you're asked to take your clothes off. Here's how he paints:
ReplyDeletehttps://m.youtube.com/watch?v=TlwCC6bIDDs
"Brown's work is primarily engaged in exploring desire as an individuated experience that connects the personal to the collective unconscious, often mediated through advertising and commercial culture. Referencing early bourgeois painting genres, she paints herself and friends enacting their own fantasies of being part of the leisure class, with props from snacks and beverages to million-dollar artworks functioning as important accessories in the assumption of privilege."
ReplyDelete_________________________________________
All sound and fury and in the end signifying nothing much....other than that the so-called "artist" has no talent and a very small intellect, totally dependent upon using meaningless jargon, instead of thoughtful expression, to explain her attempts (unsuccessful, from the examples shown) at creating "ART".
So he's not really a quadriplegic, as he can move his hands. (Walt C's youtube link.)
ReplyDelete