Dennis Ross has worked on Middle
Eastern policy matters for multiple presidents over decades. This qualifies him
as something of an expert, as someone who knows the region and its people. He
also has access to the people in power.
Now, returning from
Saudi Arabia, he is persuaded that the reforms being instituted by Crown Prince
Mohamed bin Salman are a good thing… good for the kingdom and good for the
world.
Today, the world's attention, Ross suggests, is being diverted by
actions in Syria, but he ought to mention that the Saudis have long approved of
any Israeli action against Iran and Hezbollah. Some reports have 1had it that Saudi
Arabia was willing to finance Israeli military operations against its enemies
in Syria and Lebanon.
In any event, as we have been reporting,
Saudi Arabia is being transformed, from the top down, not from the bottom up.
It’s well worth watching, especially for the impact it will have on the war
against Islamist terrorism.
Ross explains:
His efforts to transform Saudi society amount to a
revolution from above. Many seem to equate him with the shah of Iran, who
thought he could Westernize his country without modernizing its social,
religious roots and was ultimately swept away in the revolution that produced
the Islamic Republic of Iran. I see him as more like Mustafa Kemal Ataturk — a
leader who revolutionized Turkey by taking away the power of the religious base
and secularizing the country.
Of course, the Crown Prince has
had to disempower the clerical establishment and to institute liberal reforms. He also led a famous anti-corruption drive. He has been careful not to go too far, too fast, but it has been moving in the
right direction:
In my
visits, which were a year apart, whether meeting at the College of Entrepreneurship,
the MiSK Foundation, the Intelligence or Foreign Ministries, or “Etidal” — the
Global Center for Combating Extremist Ideology — the new prominence of women is
unmistakable. Equally impressive is the youth of those one meets in all these
institutions.
At
Etidal, which means moderation and is not just monitoring extremist messaging
but also forging a counter-narrative of religious coexistence, the average age
of the Saudi engineers, programmers and graphic designers is 26. With two
thirds of the Saudi
population under the age of 30, that should not be surprising. And it is
Saudi youths who convey great energy and enthusiasm; they insist that they own
the change and are committed to remaking their country.
As others have observed, from Karen Elliott House
in the Wall Street Journal to Tom Friedman in the New York Times, the Crown Prince is expressing the will of a great majority of the nation’s people…
because most of the kingdom’s people are under 30:
The
drive for change in Saudi Arabia is more credible because it is homegrown, not
a response to outside pressure. It is being driven by an understanding that
Saudi Arabia cannot sustain governance based on the lowest common denominator
among all the factions of the royal family, the approval of the Wahhabi
clerics, an economy dependent almost exclusively on oil for revenue and 80
percent of Saudi households dependent on the government.
We have been told, through the dominant philosophical
narratives, that democracy must be bottoms-up. And yet, we cannot deny the
popularity and the support enjoyed by an autocrat like Mohammed bin Salman. While
many American leftists are doing everything they can to discredit the last
presidential election, in the name of democracy, of course, among the world
political leaders who are most respected by their people are autocrats like MBS
and, of course, Xi Jinping and Vladimir Putin. Go figure.
Many many of histories most despised men started out as admired liberal rulers, beware.
ReplyDeleteIt's always good to be wary, but America's handling of the events will certainly influence them... toward success or failure. Besides, what are the alternatives?
ReplyDeleteStuart,
ReplyDelete"Besides, what are the alternatives?"
I really don't know.
History is littered though with these guys who accede to power while young, liberal, and popular who turned into the very opposite when they got older.
One example was Caligula. It's said that when he assumed the purple he made a very public show of burning all the informant's records that Tiberius had accumulated (supposedly he burned fakes and kept the originals) and we all know how infamous he turned out to be.I guess if anything I'm warning about being happy for actions of a person instead of a system.