Powerline’s Steven Hayward has been tracking the break up
and break down of American universities. By his lights, universities are now
dividing between the STEM fields and the rest. More numbers-based fields like
economics will find themselves with the STEM fields. (via Maggie’s Farm)
Hayward explained his thought in a lecture at Arizona State
University:
I think
we’re already seeing the beginnings of a de
facto divorce of universities, in which the STEM fields and other
“practical” disciplines essentially split off from the humanities and social
sciences, not to mention the more politicized departments.
At this
rate eventually many of our leading research universities will bifurcate into
marginal fever swamps of radicalism whose majors will be unfit for employment
at Starbucks, and a larger campus dedicated to science and technology
education.
The break up is starting to happen, he continues, at the University of Wisconsin at Stevens Point.
That school has now decided to eliminate a significant number of humanities and
social science departments.
He quotes Inside Higher Education:
Programs
pegged for closure are American studies, art (excluding graphic design),
English (excluding English for teacher certification), French, geography,
geoscience, German, history (excluding social science for teacher
certification), music literature, philosophy, political science, sociology and
Spanish.
Some commentators responded to Hayward by noting that while
English and French were being eliminated, the fever swamps of leftist thinking,
gender and ethnic studies were not.
Hayward responded:
To
which I would say, you’d be astounded at how politicized some foreign language
departments are. Many English departments are totally lost to the left; one
easy screen is to see whether they have dropped Shakespeare as a requirement
for an English degree. When you see that, you can cross them off your list.
I’ve already written
here about how most Geography departments have become leftist fever
swamps that have nothing to do any more with what you’d recognize as
“geography,” and I’ll bet “geoscience” is doubtful too. History is often more
than half lost to the left, too, though there is more variance in History.
But, Hayward sees a silver lining in it all. Perhaps the
English professors who are about to lose their jobs will band together and take
out after the identity politics departments and the oppression studies
faculties:
It will
further isolate the crazy “studies” departments, and may galvanize the faculty
members who know, but lack the courage to say, that these “studies” programs
are mediocre fever swamps. If more and more tenured faculty in traditional
departments face the axe, they just might start to find some courage to say
aloud what everyone knows—that the academic emperor of oppression studies isn’t
wearing any intellectual clothes.
Calling them “mediocre fever swamps” seems a mite generous
to me. They are indoctrination mills designed not only to brainwash students
but to make it impossible for them to learn much of anything within the context
of the humanities and the social sciences.
I would appear that the students who have suffered this
brainwashing are being rendered dysfunctional, unable to function with a normal
work environment. Yet, I have been informed by a commenter on this blog that the corporate world has been working to adapt to the dysfunctionality and does
not hold young hires responsible for their malformation. If such is the case,
we are in worse shape than we think.
Soooooo...businesses and corporations are turning to deprogamming new hires?
ReplyDeleteIn a way, that's a shame. Though on the one hand, the tainted humanities are deforming, on the other, do we want a breed of technocrats with no leavening understanding of literature, history, sociology or art?
ReplyDeleteAs several have commented on the Stevens Point course reductions...they are the continued razing of the Humanites developed within "western" culture...with the aim of replacement.
ReplyDeleteIt's a very narrow minded class of humanity, left or right, that wants a technocratic ruling class with no historical or cultural background.
This is an attempt to remove and replace, not eliminate.
- shoe
I cannot get myself worked up over what 22 year olds think or want. Nobody I know is remotely the same as they were in kollege, and everything I wanted to learn about (and that includes humanities) I learned almost exclusively after skool daze ended. For that matter, I doubt I'd even be interested in a 22 year old's insight into Shakespeare.
ReplyDeleteWalt, I think we'd like "a breed of technocrats with no leavening understanding of literature, history, sociology or art" AS TAUGHT NOW. Since they wouldn't understand art, literature, history, or sociology. The real stuff, yes.
ReplyDelete