Given that I graduated from the place I am always fascinated
to see what Brown University has become. For decades now it was been descending into its own Inferno of politically correctitude. Administrators seem hell bent
on devaluing a Brown degree and providing nonstop embarrassment for alumni and
alumnae.
Most parents of high school students have figured it out.
They refuse to pay for a Brown education, now costing over $70,000. Many alumni
have hopefully figured it out and have stopped contributing to the Brown indoctrination mill. Hopefully, corporate recruiters have by now crossed
Brown off their lists.
And yet, Brown is still a very popular and prestigious
place. It is certainly competitive, accepting only 9% of applicants. If you
want to know what’s wrong with American education, you should look to Brown.
Now, the Brown Student Health Service has developed a new
program designed to emasculate young men. They have established what they call
safe spaces where men can whine, whimper and moan, can flagellate themselves
and purge their toxic masculinity.
As you know, safe spaces are usually places where snowflake
children can escape from the rigors of competition and be
shielded from words that will offend them to
the roots of their being. Safe spaces offer lollypops and puppies, to cuddle
and to drool over.
At Brown, however, safe spaces are now places for male students
to go and be brainwashed. You think I am kidding. I am not. The student health
service has decided that “toxic masculinity” is a public health crisis, needing
medical attention.
Already that boggles the mind. If it is that much of a health crisis, why not try chemical castration? Is that the next step these
overzealous fanatics will impose on the male population? In the name of health, of course.
Toni Airaksinen has the story for Pajamas Media. (via Maggie’sFarm) Read it and weep:
The
Brown University Health Services office now offers “safe spaces for men” to
help them “unlearn toxic masculinity” and combat traditional notions of “what
it means to be a man.”
Viewing
masculinity as if it were a public health crisis, “Unlearning Toxic Masculinity” offers a three-pronged
approach for helping male students recover: a weekly discussion group to
unlearn “toxic masculine norms,” a biannual magazine, and a video series.
The
crux of the programming revolves around Masculinity 101 Peer Education, a peer-to-peer weekly
discussion group that convenes male students to talk about issues such as
“Cultivating Empathy” and “Harm and Healing.”
Eight
students have already been hired to facilitate these workshops, PJ Media has
learned. According to the program description, the workshops vow to teach
students what “healthier norms of masculinity can and should look like.”
Warns
Brown University: “Modern society is quick to bestow unearned privilege on men
… there is nothing in place to teach men -- young men especially -- how to
avoid abusing that privilege or how to leverage it for good.”
For anyone who has anything like a functioning brain, the norms
of what Brown calls healthy masculinity are not masculine. Empathy and healing
are traditional feminine values. There is nothing wrong with that, but applying
them to men makes men weak. It demoralizes them and saps them of assertiveness,
aggressiveness and initiative. They end up living at home with Mom and Dad,
playing video games in the cellar. Or else, ironically, they abuse women. What else to they have to offer?
As for “unearned privilege,” it’s astonishingly stupid. In
the first place, the American educational system has been showering children
with unearned praise for decades now. It’s called the self-esteem movement. As
for whether males have earned any privileges, you might ask yourself whether
their male ancestors ever accomplished anything. Don't parents want to succeed in order to provide privileges to their progeny. After all, men were instrumental in winning great wars, industrializing the world and building a great nation. What is wrong with that?
The guilt ridden fools who want Brown boys to disembarrass
themselves of their manliness are going to make it harder for said boys to
function in the world. And, dare I mention, girls are not going to flock to boys who excel at empathy and caring.
Naturally, the health service feels that its mandate extends
to reordering American society, by eliminating the gender binary. You can’t
make this stuff up:
Unlike
programming at other schools, the Masculinity 101 Peer Education program notes
that it is open to all students regardless of gender, and especially since its
programming also is dedicated to destroying the male-female gender binary.
“Folks
of all genders are taught to accept the gender binary as a biological
imperative that can never be questioned when, in fact, the gender
binary is a social construct that needs to be dismantled,” the website
states. “Masculinity 101 rejects the notion of the gender binary as the end all
be all and works to promote a more holistic understanding of oneself
encompassing one’s many facets and contradictions.”
The Brown Student Health Service believes in the idiocy
about the social construction of gender. It does not know that all human beings
have either XX or XY chromosomes, thus that the gender binary is written into
everyone’s DNA. It does not know that all human societies are constructed
around a gender binary… because no one in the past has been stupid enough to
pretend that said binary was an arbitrary
imposition on a perfectly elastic human nature.
In effect, the Brown program tries to replace the binary with a
singular and unitary set of cultural values: those associated with femininity,
with women’s work. It is trying to turn young men into young women because it
believes that such men will be less likely to abuse young women. As we know, women are saints and angels... their superior capacity for empathy makes it impossible for them to hurt anyone. I have been trying to contact Emmett Till to ask for an opinion on this matter, but so far, he has not responded.
In its infinite ignorance Brown does not recognize that the recent outburst
of male harassment has derived from the fact that when boys go to school
they enter a matriarchal culture that does its darndest to beat them into submission.
The result, as happens in any matriarchal culture, is that
you produce a generation of men who are not allowed any traditionally masculine
role— like protector or breadwinner— and who express their resentment over the
beating they received in school… by abusing and harassing women.
You cannot get much dumber than the Brown Student Health
Service. The university should be embarrassed. It will not be, but we can hope.
"Empathy and healing are traditional feminine values. There is nothing wrong with that, but applying them to men makes men weak. It demoralizes them and saps them of assertiveness, aggressiveness and initiative."
ReplyDeleteCan't really agree with the second sentence of this; I know men who are very effective leaders..have plenty of assertiveness, aggressiveness and initiative...and also high levels of empathy.
This depends on how we define empathy. Paul Bloom has persuasively argued that empathy can make people into sadistic psychopaths. Yet, the way the term is used in everyday discussions of psychology, empathy is presented as a panacea, something that will end abuse, harassment and the like. Of course, those who are selling empathy tend to say that it is essential to good leadership and good management. They are distorting the meaning to influence the culture. If empathy means feeling someone else's pain, you cannot be an effective leader and an aggressive leader if you are feeling the pain you would like to inflict on your competition or your opposition.
ReplyDeletePerhaps someone should print some notices on 3x5 cards saying "The executions will be at Noon on the (meeting place). Be there, or be square." and tape them up around the campus.
ReplyDeleteOn, no. That would be HORRIBLE(LY FUNNY).
When I attended Cornell, we had a cheer for football games against your university:
ReplyDelete"What's the color of horse shit?
Brown!!! Brown!!!"
Of course, such a cheer would not be politically acceptable today.
Class of 1975 alum here -- I stopped my gifts years ago, and told them why.
ReplyDeleteMany who speak highly of empathy don't know what they're talking about. Empathy is actually quite crippling. Moreover, one can come off as quite cold trying to avoid the intense discomfort that comes with feeling the sufferings of others.
ReplyDeleteI could not improve my squash game because I felt sorry causing my opponent to suffer at every opportunity by making him run. I did, however, get over this.