Is Iran on the brink? The story in today’s Wall Street Journal suggests that it is moving in that direction. Most media organizations
do not report on conditions in the Islamic Republic, so we ought to pay special
attention to the Journal report.
It tells us that Iran is in trouble, that it is unraveling
from within, and that the Islamic Republic's rulers can barely hold it together. The Obama administration threw it a lifeline by eliminating most sanctions
in the nuclear deal, but the mullahs used the money to support terrorism in
Lebanon and Yemen. People who are out of work and starving are not
happy about the decision.
The report begins with strikes:
Teachers
went on strike in central Iran’s city of Yazd. Steelworkers and hospital staff
walked off the job in the southwest city of Ahvaz. Railway employees protested
near Tabriz. And a bus drivers union in Tehran battled the private companies
that control many city routes.
These
were among the hundreds of recent outbreaks of labor unrest in Iran, an
indication of deepening discord over the nation’s economic troubles. Workers
are turning not only against their employers but also Iran’s government, piling
pressure on leaders who promised but failed to deliver better times in the two
years since economic sanctions were lifted in the nuclear deal.
Prices
of eggs, meat and bread are rising more than 10% a year, compounding consumer
woes. Unemployment is about 12%, and the Iranian rial has fallen sharply
against the dollar, raising prices on imported goods and prompting a central
bank intervention in April. Oil prices have risen, bringing a moment of relief,
but consumers say they’ve yet to see the benefits.
Note well: hundreds of outbreaks of labor unrest. High inflation, high unemployment, unkept
promises… a formula for trouble. We know where the money is going:
Meanwhile,
hundreds of millions of dollars in proceeds from the nuclear agreement have
gone to Iran’s military involvement in Syria and support of Lebanon’s Hezbollah
rather than the national economy, critics of the deal say.
It isn’t just the labor unrest. Financial institutions have
failed and the economy is being seriously mismanaged:
Iran’s
labor disputes are extending a panoply of protests in the Islamic Republic that
stem from social, economic and political strains. In December and January,
people poured onto the streets for two weeks of demonstrations, touched off by
deposits lost through failed financial institutions. The protests, Iran’s
largest in nearly a decade, were quashed by authorities.
Since
then, women have posted videos that show them removing mandatory headscarves, a
criminal offense. Defrauded depositors still air grievances, and workers have
kept up demands.
The protesters believe that a corrupt political and
theocratic elite is taking all the money for itself:
The
simmering anger, as voiced by protesters, is stoked by the belief that a
corrupt and politically empowered elite is siphoning off Iran’s wealth.
“The
social gap is about to explode,” said Alireza Saghafi-Khorasani, the secretary
of a labor-rights group in Iran. “There is no economic plan.”
The
government, led by President Hassan Rouhani but presided over by Supreme Leader
Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, has had to confront the many grievances. In the sugar
industry, imports of the commodity have been periodically banned.
Iran has had four decades of what is called a revolution.
How has it worked out for working class Iranians? Not very well:
The
financial situation of blue-collar Iranians haven’t improved much in the nearly
four decades since the revolution. Urban family incomes average around $800 a
month, with a minimum wage of around $200 a month.
“Where
in the world is a worker whose wage is four times below the poverty line forced
by the police to work?” activist Jafar Azimzadeh said in a video posted on the
messaging app Telegram. “This is a crime. This is slavery.”
Monthly
cash payments for consumers were cut in response to lower oil revenues before
the parliament restored them in February, in the wake of protests. Many with
jobs, however, remain unpaid.
And, of course, there has been a cultural rebellion, with
women ripping off their headscarves… and being summarily arrested and
imprisoned. We do not know why the people are rebelling now. Perhaps conditions
are getting intolerably bad. Perhaps people see neighboring Muslim
countries liberalizing and do not understand why they continue to be terrorized
and tyrannized.
Evidently, it is an important story, well worth telling.
It is a story that has been retold at the cost of millions of lives: Tyranny and oppression sprouted from the seeds of jealousy and envy. Where is the harm in having people live according to the "dictates of their own hearts" rather than hewing to a line scribed by a master holding a whip? The harm is that independence is a trespass against personalities bent on domination and control; those characteristics are inherently incompatible and with enough inertia small resistance multiplies to battle and into revolt. It seems societies that are unfettered by categories of class are more likely to repel than attract rule by force - I'm thinking of the US in 1940 vs Japan and Europe as an example.
ReplyDeleteThere is a moral and religious construction adding to the mix and that spawns large discussions on morality and cultural rules.
Permanent, on-going "revolutions" are not sustainable except by force, and the forces eventually crack.
ReplyDeleteStuart: The Obama administration threw it a lifeline by eliminating most sanctions in the nuclear deal, but the mullahs used the money to support terrorism in Lebanon and Yemen. People who are out of work and starving are not happy about the decision.
ReplyDeleteNot a lifeline, but removing an excuse! The leadership of Iran has been scapegoating the US and it was credible, but after sanctions were lifted people expected things to get better, and suddenly the leaders have to produce something. People who have suffered for years don't have much to lose in standing up now, and standing up in a country with limited human rights is a true act of courage that will inspire more to take a risk.
So the Iranian government is at a cross-roads all without any new effort on our part. They have oil revenue, its not like they're destitute, but their priorities must change.