In principle, Great Britain voted to exit the European Union
because it feared the open arms and open borders policies of its neighbors. By
the terms of the Union, migrants admitted into Germany, France and Sweden
would be free to travel and to settle in Britain. IN addition, the
Brits had had enough with the Brussels bureaucrats deciding how they should run
their country, and you arrive at Brexit.
So far, so good.
And yet, now that most of Europe is awakening to the dangers
posed by the waves of Muslim refugees that they have welcomed into their midst,
Great Britain seems blissfully impervious to the danger they pose. Eastern
European nations have closed their borders. Germany is about to implode
politically under the weight of the Merkel policy… you know the story.
And yet, once-Great Britain is mired in the past, in the
Merkel-Obama past where the true war is not against Islam, but against
Islamophobia.
Bruce Bawer has the story, and a depressing story it is. He
addresses the question of Muslim assimilation first. He notes that British
Muslims teach their children not to socialize with non-Muslim children, even to
shun them for being infidels.
For those who imagined that Muslims would easily embrace the
bounty of Western civilization, this must come as something of a shock. For
those not deluded, it does not.
Bawer suggests that it explains the relative insouciance of
local police when they learned of grooming gangs. Gang rape of English
schoolgirls by Muslim men… not a problem. Sex trafficking of English
schoolgirls by Muslim men… not a problem. The chance of being accused of being
a racist… big problem. For the uninitiated, it’s called human sacrifice:
The
clear Koranic directives about relations with infidels explains a lot. It
accounts, for example, for the existence in cities all over England of
so-called “grooming gangs” -- those groups of violent Muslim rapists that, over
a period of years or decades, have maintained bevies of non-Muslim girls to
satisfy their carnal desires. From earliest childhood, these Muslim men have
been brought up on the unworthiness of non-Muslims -- and, particularly, on the
tenet that it's not just permissible but virtuous to sexually abuse female
infidels. So it only follows, as night follows day, that forming stables of sex
toys out of other people's children is hunky-dory.
We
know, of course, that British authorities were aware of these rape gangs for a
long time but failed to do anything about them for fear of being called racist.
In some cities, pressure by activists eventually compelled those authorities to
act against these gangs. But the same authorities have striven to minimize the
scale of these atrocities, to distract public attention from them as much as
possible, to deny any connection between them and the teachings of Islam, and
to harass and demonize those -- most famously, Tommy Robinson -- who insist on
responding to them with the appropriate degree of outrage and on pointing out
their Islamic roots.
Once-Great Britain has become an Orwellian dystopia where
Western civilization is the root of all evil and where Muslim culture is an
unalloyed good. If ever anyone Muslim does anything wrong, the fault must like
with those dastardly Western Christians. If not the Christians, blame it on the
Jews.
Well,
the main point is that it's a perfect specimen of what would appear to be
Britain's new Orwellian orthodoxy, which, one gathers, compels every good Brit
to affirm that, where Islam is concerned, everything is the exact opposite of
the way it really is. According to this orthodoxy -- which isn't exclusive to
Britain, but which increasingly seems to have reached its fullest flowering
there (and, needless to say, in poor, lost Sweden) -- it's Islamic culture that
embodies virtue and decency and all good things, and it's one's own culture
that represents a malignant threat thereto.
The new ethos has even infected the criminal justice system.
It reminds you of the Obama administration directive, to the effect that
schools should cease expelling disruptive minority youth like Nikolas Cruz,
because it made it appear that these children were criminals. If you do not
call them criminals they cannot be criminals, right?
In Once Great Britain, the same pertains:
This is
a country where judges are now officially instructed to go soft on non-white
criminals while coming down hard on people convicted of expressing offensive
attitudes toward protected groups.
The fault lies in multiculturalism, layered over with
intense Western guilt. Whatever it is, it’s a very bad sign:
Have
they really -- 1984 style
-- developed a blindness to the evils of Islam and a perverse conviction that
it's their own native culture that's the menace? Are they so devoted to
multiculturalism that they're willing to be complicit in the destruction of any
number of girls' lives -- and willing, too, to sell out centuries of British
freedom, fairness, and justice -- in order to see it flourish? Are they so
imbued with that famous British politeness that they dare not speak up against
even the most blatant of evils? Are they just plain cowards? Or is the
difference between the Brits and their burka-forbidding neighbors rooted in
British imperial history? In other words, is it post-imperial guilt, fed by
anti-Western schooling and the poisonous BBC, that is leading the British, in
remarkable numbers, to grovel to Islam even more shamefully than their
counterparts in most of the rest of Europe?
One understands that the Brits despise President Trump. One understands that Trump has not exactly paid obeisance to Theresa May. Beyond the fact that May has shown herself to be singularly inept in negotiating Brexit, might it be that May herself, a Tory, no less, has declared that she has no problem with women wearing burqas-- because she thinks it a free choice. Once Great Britain no longer even pretends to be a world leader.
The Brits have enstupidated themselves and made themselves the carpet that Muslims walk on.
ReplyDeleteThe problem with Brexit is that it was fuelled by the belief that British society was being undermined and destroyed by the evil EU bureaucrats in Brussels, when in fact Britain's real enemies were the traitors in Westminster. Britain has the most malignant ruling class on the planet and that ruling class intends to destroy every shred of British culture and British identity.
ReplyDeleteTheresa May is a far more dangerous enemy than Merkel.
Here's the Spectator's take on the special relation of Britain and islam:
ReplyDelete"In all the agonising about Islamism, and what to do about it, it would be a mistake to forget a very useful fact: that Britain has a special relationship with Islam and has done for centuries. The friendship with Islam is unique.
Spain was home to Andalusia, a Muslim empire for 700 years. The Germans, Poles and Austrians saw off Turkish Muslim invaders in the Siege of Vienna in 1529 and then again at the Battle of Vienna in 1683. The French lived in the shadow of 732 and the Battle of Poitiers. Britain alone, cut off from Catholic Europe, forged a relationship with Muslims built on trade, the rule of law, mutual respect and an exchange of ideas and cultures. It would be a terrible shame to forget this friendship now.
It was Queen Elizabeth I who did more than anyone to cultivate this relationship. During the Reformation, what might be considered the first Brexit, England was isolated by Europe’s Catholic monarchs and, in 1570, Elizabeth was excommunicated by Pope Pius V. The Protestant Queen refused to bow to European intimidation so she found new and willing allies in the Muslim Ottomans, then a 400-year-old empire with territories in the Balkans, North Africa, central Asia and the Middle East."
Elizabeth I, not the current Elizabeth, she is II.
https://www.spectator.co.uk/2018/05/britain-and-islam-the-real-special-relationship/
Of course, the Muslims couldn't invade England then, other than the one in the latest Robin Hood movie.
ReplyDelete