Obama Speaks

As you know, America has been waiting on bated breath for the Second Coming of the Messiah. Now that all good leftists know that Donald Trump is the Devil Incarnate, all that remains is for Barack Obama to return to smite him… thereby precipitating the arrival of the New Jerusalem.

Last week, the Messiah reappeared in Johannesburg, South Africa. What words of wisdom passed from his lips? Glad you asked. Our former president told the assembled multitudes that men have been getting on his nerves.

What would we do without Barack Obama?

The Washington Free Beacon reports the good news (via Maggie's Farm):

Former President Barack Obama said Wednesday he wanted women to get more involved in politics and social movements because men "have been getting on my nerves lately."

Speaking with young African leaders at a town hall event in Johannesburg, South Africa, Obama said men were "violent" and "bullying."

"Women in particular, by the way, I want you to get more involved," he said. "Because men have been getting on my nerves lately. Every day I read the newspaper, and I just think—brothers, what’s wrong with you guys? What's wrong with us? I mean, we're violent, we're bullying. You know, just not handling our business."

"So I think empowering more women on the continent— that right away is going to lead to some better policies," he said.

Think about it. Obama considers men to be an alien species. Might one not question whether he counts himself among the men who have been getting on his nerves lately? Because if he does not consider himself a part of that accursed group, the only explanation for his words is that he is channeling someone else’s thought. Roughly as a ventriloquist’s dummy.

If a woman had said that men are getting on her nerves, the sentence would make good sense. It might be right. It might be wrong. It would make sense. But, coming from a male human being, it sounds discordant.

No one noticed, because they wanted to leave it to me.

As for whether policy needs a more feminine touch, wasn’t this guy president of the United States for eight years? Didn't he institute more feminine policies, that is, more woman friendly policies? Weren't his policies run by Hillary Clinton, Susan Rice, Samtha Power and John Kerry. How much more womanly can you get?

In truth, if we consider that Obama projected weakness on the world stage, perhaps his more feminine policies paved the way for a man who was anything but feminine. Why not understand that the Obama years gave us Donald Trump?

Besides, doesn’t our former president understand that increasing feminization brings out the worst in men?

And why not mention-- yet again-- that the leftist men who have recently been outed as bullies and brutes, for sexual assault and sexual harassment, have often been full-throated supporters of Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama. After all, Harvey Weinstein was best buddies with the Clintons.

In truth, no one bears as much responsibility for the rise of authoritarian leaders as Barack Obama. A president whose citizen of the world, open borders yearnings induced German Chancellor Merkel to allow well over a million refugees into her nation should take some responsibility for the current state of world affairs.

And why does Obama suggest that men are especially evil, especially greedy and power hungry… for having big houses. Keep in mind this man of the people signed, with his wife, one of the biggest book contracts in history, for tens of millions of dollars.

Authoritarianism did not begin yesterday. It became more and more prominent the more then-President Obama retreated from the burden of world leadership. This left an opening for aspiring alpha males around the world.

The Free Beacon continues:

Obama also singled out "men" as being susceptible to being greedy and power-hungry as he raised concerns about the rise of authoritarianism around the globe in a lengthy speech Tuesday in South Africa.

"History also shows the power of fear. History shows the lasting hold of greed and the desire to dominate others in the minds of men. Especially men," he said.

Obama didn't single out President Donald Trump by name in the speech, but his remarks were taken as implicit criticism of his successor's approach at the White House.

Men want to dominate. Ergo, we need more women in power. More women like Hillary Clinton, like Theresa May, like Angela Merkel.

Obama did not want to dominate. He wanted to submit. He submitted to Russia. He submitted to Iran. He submitted to China. 

He oozed fear. Because who was more afraid than Barack Obama? Who cut and ran in Iraq? Who walked away from Syria, leaving it to Vladimir Putin? Who was so terrified of radical Islamists that he refused even to use the term?

Obama did not give a great speech. It did not make a great deal of sense. It was seriously unsophisticated, thought-wise. If the best that the left can offer in its campaign to slay the Antichrist is Barack Obama, it needs to go back to the drawing board.

Oh yes, I forgot. Today's progressive left has a group of woman candidates. It has the seriously undereducated Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. And, it also has Pocahontas herself, Elizabeth Warren… subject of a glowing cover story in New York Magazine this morning.

One reason Hillary Clinton lost—aside from the fact that she was not likeable enough—was that her supporters wanted people to vote for her because she was a woman. And for no other reason. In truth, Hillary’s achievements, thin as they were, derived from her husband. Her jobs were mere sinecures, offered as a reward for helping her husband to survive his multiple sexual scandals. Think of it, denouncing bad and dominant men while promoting a woman who was our very own enabler in chief. If any woman bears responsibility for #MeToo, it's Hillary Clinton.