Here’s a strange letter that reflects a strange attitude.
The letter writer, who I assume to be female, has done a bad job in a training
program. She disappointed herself and disappointed colleagues and supervisors.
She now awaits a ritual graduation where management will offer a dollop of praise
to each of the trainees. Fair enough. But, she dreads this ritual because she
believes that their praise of her will be dishonest, and that everyone knows
it. Or does she dread it because she fears that they might be honest?
After all, in a world where we are told that honesty is a transcendent value, she is trapped between thinking that people are lying about her in order to spare her feelings or are telling the truth and making her look like a pathetic failure.
So, she writes to Washington Post advice columnist, Carolyn Hax:
I am
finishing a training program and the ritual is a gathering of the senior people
standing up to say (presumably nice) things about each of the departing
trainees. I’ve had a rocky year and my close supervisors and I know it’s well
short of my potential and we’re all kind of disappointed in me. So it sounds
just excruciating to go to this “graduation” thing and sit through someone
trying to publicly praise me for show. Is there a graceful way to get out of
going to something like this?
Dreading
“Graduation”
At the risk of sounding repetitious, I would point out that
we know next-to-nothing about this situation. We know that DG is ashamed of her
poor performance. We do not know why. We do not know where she was working,
with whom she was working, what kind of job she had, what tasks she failed at.
Nothing. Nada. Zilch. We only know that she feels shame.
And that she wants to run away, to hide her face. Apparently,
when people feel shame, in the current cultural historical juncture, they
ignore all specific details and realities… in order to make it more difficult
for anyone to help them regain their bearings.
But then, DG seems most bothered by the fact that she will
be praised at a gathering of senior management. In truth, she does not know what they are
going to say. She does not know how they will say it. She is seriously torqued
about receiving unearned praise. And yet, things are never quite that black and white. She might have contributed effectively to one
project while failing at several others. It might be that management will
praise her for the good work she did, while graciously overlooking the bad.
Would she prefer openness and honesty? Would she prefer that
management call her out for incompetence? It does not and should not happen.
And yet, why would she be ashamed to hear a compliment she does not believe she
deserves? Could it be because she will know that everyone is thinking that they
are just doing it for show, and thus, that it redoubles her shame? It might also happen that her supervisors will find some saving grace, some area of competence and will point it out... thus changing everyone's picture of her as a failure.
As I said, she is confused. Thus, her request is confusing.
Her dread amounts to cowardice. As for what she should do, she ought obviously to sit through the
presentations and accept whatever praise her bosses are capable of offering. Gracefully. In
nearly all cases, managers will be tactful and considerate. They are not in the
business of humiliating trainees.
Of course, her fellow trainees might use the occasion to
laugh at her, to humiliate her further. We know nothing specific about the
situation, so we cannot know.
Again, we do not
know whether she has been systematically humiliated by management. We do not
know whether she has been made to feel like a scapegoat for failures.
In any event, Hax advises her to suck it up and to sit
gracefully through the ritual. That is, to hold her head high, even to accept
that she might deserve some modicum of praise for having done some one thing
right. I am especially impressed by her opening line, words to live by, namely that there is almost always a graceful way out.
Hax responds:
There’s
a graceful way out of just about everything.
But,
I’m not sure that’s your best play. You had a rocky year, okay, you didn’t live
up to your full potential. Bummer. And now . . . onward. Sit through your moment of less
effusive praise than you had hoped for, clap for everyone else’s turn, have a
cookie and go home.
Then
you become praiseworthy for something maybe you hadn’t anticipated (and
certainly didn’t hope for) going in, and may ultimately serve you better: your
ability to show up and hold your head high even though things didn’t break your
way.
Hax believes, reasonably, that the ritual will highlight the
fact that she has disappointed herself, and that the perfunctory and ritualized
expression of appreciation can only make her feel worse. She has an excessively negative view of herself. We suspect that she is exaggerating, seeing the glass as a lot more than half empty.
Then again, one can only wonder why she would not take pride in whatever successes she has achieved, however limited they were. As it happened, DG feels like a failure. In truth, she might have discovered that the
job was not for her. She might have discovered that she would do best to look
in another direction.
The key, Hax correctly asserts, is to have a stiff upper
lip, not to let them see you sweat, to hold her head up high, and, I would add,
resolve to do better the next time. To do much better the next time. As Hax sees clearly, if DG holds her head up she will command far more respect than she would have if she had hung her head in shame. Or if she had failed to attend the meeting.
We would like to know how DG can change her ways, but we
know nothing about her or her job. This
tells us that she needs more grounding, that she needs to relate to objective
realities and not her emotions. In other words, that she does better to direct
her attention away from her feelings and toward her jobs. In short, she should
overcome one of the bad habits she seems to have learned from therapy.
What the aich. We all fail. Suck it up. Move on. Who cares about anybody else?
ReplyDelete