Could be that the tanking Super Bowl ratings did not merely
reflect the quality of the football game? Could it be that America tuned out to
the game because they were tired of being preached at by “woke” advertising
professionals? Was the game hijacked by propagandists?
Somehow or other advertisers-- burning with righteous zeal at
the defeat of a woman who owed her mediocre political career to her ability to
enable her husband’s sexual harassment and assaults-- decided that instead of selling
products, they would use their Super Bowl time to propagandize the higher
truths that they and only they can see clearly. Think about it: all of this garbage is being foisted on us in the name of Hillary Clinton.
You have to wonder how American corporations expect to compete if their marketing and advertising professionals care
more about social justice than about making profits.
The Red State blog offers the hypothesis.
The
boring game may not have been the only thing causing people to tune out.
The Super Bowl was rife
with social justice messaging, including the airing of the sexist,
anti-male Gillette commercial. The new Handmaid’s Tale trailer, which mocked
Reagan’s “It’s Morning In America” ad, also
took a swipe at the religious right.
An anti-male ad for Gillette products, a large number of
which are used by men. There, that will get their attention. And then another
paranoid fantasy attacking Ronald Reagan and the religious right. You see,
Anglo-American civilization, the one that has led the march toward women’s
rights and that has done better than any other at offering women opportunities,
is being tarred as a vast right wing conspiracy to oppress women. Whoever
thought of this nonsense should learn how to think. Rest assured that when
faced with cultures that systematically oppress women, the woke feminists who
bow down to the Handmaid’s Tale will run for cover and claim that
multiculturalism will not allow them to criticize female genital mutilation and
Muslim rape culture.
The Daily Caller offers some other examples of preachy ads:
Super
Bowl advertisers used the massive platform to lecture Americans on a number of
topics — from using clean energy and respecting the media to the proper
treatment of mermaids in the age of #MeToo.
CBS,
the network that hosted the big game, promoted “girl power” with an ad about
girls playing football — and sponsor Budweiser took the time to note that the
world-famous St. Louis-based company is now brewing its signature beers with
wind power.
Ah yes, girls playing football. Why don’t we have a national
campaign to overcome the blatant sexism of the NFL? I propose that next year
all NFL teams will have women playing on each and every down, on both sides of
the ball, in a number proportional to their representation in the nation. Will people tune in to co-ed professional
football? It will probably depend on the outfits. But, hey, we must fight
sexism everywhere, don’t you think?
As for the silliness about proclamations about girl power,
haven’t these woke ad persons figured out that we have already had five decades
of people intoning about strong empowered women. The result was nominating the
nation’s enabler in chief for the presidency, an incompetent fraud who owed her
career to her last name. And haven’t they figured out that the #MeToo movement,
which flooded the media with images of women as weak, ineffectual, harassed,
abused, assaulted victims told us that words do not have magical powers. Saying that women are strong and empowered does not make them strong and empowered. It makes them weaker and more vulnerable.
But, what good would these executives be if they could not
double down on stupid.
Speaking of female empowerment, the dating site Bumble is
pounding the drums for more female self-assertion and even leaning in. It
missed the moment when Michelle Obama famously and correctly declared the
leaning in doesn’t work. But, why let the verdict of experience get in the way
of your zealotry?
The story comes from CBS News:
The
Austin-based dating app, Bumble, is creating a buzz this year with its 2019
Super Bowl ad focusing on female empowerment.
It’s
part of a new partnership with tennis mogul Serena Williams who calls on women
“to make the first move” in going after what they want.
The
commercial starts with Williams saying, "The world tells you to wait, that
waiting is polite, but if I waited to be invited in, I never would have stood
out."
And also:
I think
we're all super excited to have representation here,” said Alex Williamson,
Chief Brand Officer at Bumble.
Since
the dating app’s launch, more than 750 million first moves have been made by
women, but Williamson wants it to go beyond that.
"As
women, we're constantly told to wait or what to do or who to be and really the
choice is yours,” Williamson told CBS Austin. “The societal pressure that's
placed on you, you're able to step out of that in any moment of your
life."
Apparently, it is true that women are more likely to make
the first move on a date. It is also true that more and more women are having
sex on their first dates. And then, these same women cannot understand why men
do not respect them. Or why men assume as a default position that today’s women
are happy to give it away for free.
As I said, doubling down on stupid.
And then there were the righteous ads about how we should
all understand each other… The message dates to the mid-1960s, it appeared in a
song by a group called the Youngbloods. It was insipid then. It is insipid now.
It was addressed to teenagers then. It is addressed to overgrown teenagers now.
Google
advertised its translation feature with an ad focused mainly on how the ability
to understand each other can bring people closer together. The image it showed
when talking about how some language can be hurtful or divisive — police
officers in riot gear at a protest — did not go unnoticed.
And then, there was an ad about the importance of a free
press. It was offered up by Jeff Bezos through his Washington Post. You might
ask how Bezos feels about the free press that exposed some of his recent
dalliances, but that would be impolite.
The Daily Caller summarizes the Post ad:
The Washington Post topped them all, however, taking
out a multi-million dollar spot to talk about the importance of a free press.
Featuring several journalists who have been killed for doing their jobs —
including WaPo’s own reporter Jamal Khashoggi — it painted journalists as unbiased sources
of information necessary to secure the freedoms Americans enjoy every day.
The ad,
narrated by actor Tom Hanks, was a sore spot for several who got wind of it
before it aired. Given the current climate in media and the fact that a number
of outlets have recently faced layoffs, some felt that the choice to take out
an ad — particularly one that was so expensive — was “in poor taste.”
So, the press is dying, because it does not report the news
any more. It has become a propaganda organ, promoting leftist propaganda. The general public has responded by tuning it out. As for providing information,
former New York Times executive editor Jill Abramson recently pointed out that
the Times, the gold standard in American dailies, has taken to slanting and
distorting the news to make the Trump administration look bad. They have become
the propaganda arm of the Resistance, thus compromising their responsibility to
report the news in an unbiased fashion.
I am a devoted sports fan. I like to play most of all, and I even like to watch other people having fun playing "spectator" sports (e.g., our local AAA MiLB baseball team). But I do not watch "sports" on TV, which is basically a stream of commercial advertising, interrupted by brief periods of live action overlaid with idiotic commentary from dental whitener addicts.
ReplyDeleteI certainly didn't watch, but I'll agree the WaPost ad was expensive self-promotion, and extra-demoralizing to journalists who have been laid off in recent years to a dying profession.
ReplyDeletehttps://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2019/02/04/jeff-bezos-super-bowl-washington-post-commerical-224721
---
Was the Post ad worth it? Let’s imagine Bezos had spent the $10.5 million on reporters instead. He could add 10 to the Post’s staff at $100,000 a year for 10 year... Surely such a purchase of talent and snacks would have shined a brighter light on the darkness Bezos fears than a one-off Super Bowl commercial.
---
Leftists believe whatever they want to believe, even, perhaps because, it's nuts.
ReplyDeleteI lost interest in football, and especially the Super Bowl, 40+ years ago. Commercials I'd pay no attention to. Gillette, they've sunk to the depths. The WaPoo, them, too.
Google: Don't trust them. "As for providing information, former New York Times executive editor Jill Abramson recently pointed out that the Times, the gold standard in American dailies,..." is now dross, and has been for some time.
When the NFL decided to allow a gang of disgruntled, America-hating, racist, riff-raff kneel in contempt of the greatest nation in the history of the world, and did nothing in response for over a year except issue hollow, empty bromides designed to make everyone happy, I left for good. There was only one right decision, and the NFL couldn't make it because they have no leadership. I cancelled the NFL ticket, cancelled DirectTv, and dumped the leftist drones on ESPN. Roger Goodell is a protean coward, right down to his bones, and I despise cowardice--doubly so among men and women in positions of great influence and leadership. The guy who runs the forklift in my warehouse has more moral clarity that the man who runs the NFL.
ReplyDeleteIt was a cancellation from God. Now I swim for an hour every morning, hit the barbells 3 times a week, and fill in the remainder with my Krav Maga instructor. Sunday is an afternoon with my buddies at the gun range and then cigars. The NFL is dead to me and I am twice as alive because of it. Thanks, Roger the Wimp, you provoked me a better man and I took up the challenge.