In a better world we would look at the academic
underperformance of inner city children and ask ourselves what we can do to
improve it. Alas, we do not live in a better world. At least, not in New York
City.
Dare we mention that tearing down statues of confederate
generals does not really improve anyone’s ability to do algebra. Marching for
social justice, ranting about white privilege, insisting on different standards
for different students… none of them really improves anyone’s ability to excel
in high school.
As it happens, we do know that charter schools in New York
City achieve far better performance ratings than do public schools. Our
governor Andrew Cuomo has recognized this truth. The vice chancellor of the
State University System, one Meryl Tisch has seen it. She just recommended that the state legislature lift the cap on the number of charter schools. Heck, even the Trump administration department of education has earmarked more funds to New York’s
Success Academies, charter schools whose students perform better than most of
the state’s suburban high school students.
And yet, alas, the enemies of educational opportunity and
academic achievement have lined up to fight the good fight against these
bastions of academic excellence. Led by Comrade de Blasio and teachers’ unions,
New York City is doing everything in its power to stunt the growth of charter
schools.
The Wall Street Journal editorialized on the subject this
morning. It begins with the facts:
Most
children at urban public schools aren’t learning what they should. So it’s
encouraging to see New York Governor Andrew Cuomo ask fellow Democrats who run
Albany to lift the cap on the number of charter schools allowed in New York.
The
state now caps the total number of charters statewide at 460. But in New York
City, where the demand is greatest and where 235 charters are now teaching
123,000 students, the subcap has already been reached. New York public schools
teach about 1.14 million students overall with a budget of some $25 billion.
Why cap
the number of good schools? The most recent state test results for grades 3-8
show that while the majority of New York students attending traditional public
schools are not proficient in either math or English language arts (ELA), a
majority of charter school students are.
It’s not just New York:
The New
York City results reflect evidence elsewhere. A study released this month from
the Department of Education Reform at the University of Arkansas examined eight
big cities—Atlanta, Boston, Denver, Houston, Indianapolis, New York City, San
Antonio and the District of Columbia—to determine which type of public school
offers the better return on the educational dollar.
Their
finding? In all cities, charter schools outperformed traditional public schools
in standardized test scores—despite receiving less funding per pupil. Charters
were more cost effective and delivered a greater return on investment.
In New York the mayor and the teachers’ unions are standing
in the way of educational opportunity for minority children. If Republicans had
been doing this, you would be hearing them denounced for racism:
Even
when permitted to open, charters are often held hostage by political
leaders—such as Mayor Bill de Blasio—who are backed by teachers unions that
don’t like charters because they’re exempt from union work rules. The Success
Academy charters, one of the highest performing, notes that though it’s willing
to open its doors to thousands more children, it can’t expand because the city
refuses to provide space—even though the city has 212 half-empty school
buildings.
But, they’re Democrats. They have the right feelings. So we
cannot tax them with cosigning children to academic underperformance.
Teachers' Unions will not allow Charter Schools to break the union teachers' rice bowls.
ReplyDelete(H/t, The Sand Pebbles.)