Obama says: Women Are Indisputably Better Leaders

In exchange for hundreds of thousands of dollars Barack Obama showed up in Singapore to tout the indisputable greatness of women leaders.  

In a conversation about leadership Obama said this:

Now women, I just want you to know, you are not perfect, but what I can say pretty indisputably is that you are better than us [men].

I’m absolutely confident that for two years if every nation on earth was run by women, you would see a significant improvement across the board on just about everything... living standards and outcomes.

I will not carp on the grammatical error-- it should be, better than we, not us-- but I will remark on the rhetorical ploy. That lies in the word, “indisputably.” Would you ever dare to dispute an indisputable opinion?

Since Obama offered no evidence to buttress his opinion, he was merely offering an opinion, an absurd opinion, at that, he cannot say with any degree of certainty that women are better leaders than men. And yet, he is absolutely confident... based on no evidence.

As I say, it's a cheap trick, a rhetorical ploy, one that rejects rational deliberation or debate.

As for testing this opinion, designed to manipulate low-IQ women into voting for Democrats, we could think of Carrie Lam in Hong Kong or Aung San Suu Kyi in Myanmar. How are they doing? Was Obama perhaps thinking of Evita Peron?

And then there was the hapless Theresa May who led Great Britain for two years? And, of course, German Chancellor Merkel who is destroying her nation and her political party by her open arms policy of welcoming far more Muslim migrants than her nation can handle. Remember former European foreign policy chief, Federika Mogherini and her appeasement policy toward Iran.And of course the European Union, fast on its way to becoming a relic is now being led by women. 

Remember the time when Obama said that Hillary Clinton was the most qualified candidate ever to run for president of the United States. I for one thought it was a joke, an instance of irony.

In truth, Hillary Clinton was an empty resume. She had no serious qualifications and had never produced any superior outcomes-- think, leading from behind in Libya. And let’s not forget her decisive leadership when her ambassador to Libya was murdered in Benghazi. 

What better sign of gross incompetence and gross dereliction than declaring, at a Congressional hearing: “What difference, at this point, does it make.” Imagine saying that to the families of those who were killed in Benghazi?

Great leaders take sole responsibility for failure. They always credit others for their successes.

In fact, Hillary Clinton was such a pathetically bad leader that she could not beat an amateur politician named Trump. And she was such a loser that she could not even accept defeat graciously. While Obama was whining about men who cannot step off the stage, we note that the dowager Duchess of Chappaqua could not step off the political stage when she suffered political humiliation… that is, when the American public saw through her charade.