The letter comes to us from Great Britain. A woman who
obviously has much too much time on her hands writes to New York Magazine
columnist Ask
Polly, to tell us how much therapy helped her. As has become my habit, I
will not share Polly’s usual inanities, out of respect for your sensibility.
The value of the letter lies in the picture it offers of
therapy, what it does, what it doesn’t do. It comes to us from someone who is
touting the benefits of therapy, so it is not coming from a chronic detractor.
You will see that among the advantages she gained from therapy was that she
broke up with her live-in boyfriend. Precisely why that should count as a
benefit we do not know. Apparently, he was not sufficiently womanly for her
taste. He was insufficiently emotional, insufficiently in touch with his
feelings, insufficiently vulnerable.
For some reason the letter writer now wants to marry someone
who is just like her. Some would call this narcissism. But she insists that she
wants to marry someone who has also done therapy. Whatever does she mean by
this?
I would hypothesize that she feels now that she has joined a
cult, a quasi religious cult, and that she can only relate to people who live
within the same echo chamber that she does. For those who would like to read an
excellent book about the proliferation of such cults-- it is not limited to
therapy-- I recommend Tara Isabella Burton’s book, Strange Rites.
So, the woman is obviously a bit of a flake. She has retreated
from the world to move into her soul. She honors her absurd feelings,
regardless. She is obsessed with her childhood. She does not want to have
children because of-- you guessed it-- climate change. Whether this contributed
to her lost relationship, we do not know.
I recently went through a mental health crisis
triggered by burnout, then a breakup, both right before lockdown. I feel good
now, and I know a big part of what got me here is having consistently done the
work to honor my inconvenient feelings over the past half-decade. I have worked
with a therapist to unpack how my childhood fuels my perfectionism, I work
every day to cultivate self-compassion for my deeply flawed self and others.
I’m 30, and though I love solitude and I’m too pessimistic about climate change
to procreate, I also believe that being in deep, sustained relation with
another person is one of the big wonders and joys of being alive. I know at
some point I’ll start dating again. That’s where I falter.
Anyway, when she began her therapeutic journey she was living
with a man. They were on the verge of marriage, but they were also very woke.
She uses words like “heteronormative” which identifies her as a cultist. In
truth, she learned from therapy that a relationship should involve wallowing in
emotions. It is an especial waste of time, and her insistent zealotry, which
involved her refusal to deal with a human being who was not constituted as she
was, killed the relationship. For that she thanks her therapist. It shows you
the level at which she has been brainwashed:
My relationship was the serious, cohabiting type.
People were probably expecting some kind of schmaltzy Instagram engagement
announcement from us any day. Neither of us cared about these heteronormative
milestones, but we had different expectations of what it takes to make a
long-term relationship work. I may not have been set on marriage, but I did
want a partner that actively showed up to connect with me on an emotional level,
with each of us mining the depths of our own bullshit to learn how to better
relate to one another and build a productive and joyful life together. My ex,
on the other hand, was confused about why I always wanted to make things more
complicated than they needed to be. He wanted to coast through life, never
feeling the depths of despair but never quite reaching the height of joy
either.
She continues to explain that she and her girlfriends are
emotionally evolved while the men they meet are emotionally avoidant. In truth,
if that is what she wants and if she does not want to procreate, she ought to
hook up with a woman. That would solve her problems instantly. One suspects
that her therapist was seducing her into learning to love a woman. Trying to make
a man into a woman is a losing bet. It's better to go with the real thing
than a cheap imitation.
Obviously, a woman who thinks that emotion is all that matters
is seriously disconnected from the real world. If that helps her out, so be it.
It makes her sound like a blithering, bloody fool:
I live in the U.K., and I’m struck by the fact
that a significant number of women I know are in some form of this exact
relationship dynamic: emotionally avoidant men who are disinclined (both
culturally and personally) to see any reason to fix that, partnered with
emotionally evolved (if anxious) high-functioning women who are secretly
harboring hope that their partner one day decides to Do the Work to make the
relationship better. I hoped my ex would Do the Work for so long. We started
going to couples therapy in the last few months of our relationship, but by
then it was too late. As someone who thinks doing your own shadow work is the
most fascinating and urgent part of being alive, it was hard to find myself dating
someone who more or less saw the whole thing as a frivolous lark. My feelings
sent him into fight or flight mode every single time we had conflict.
It never crossed her minds to keep a few feelings to herself.
It never crossed her therapist’s mind to tell her that there is more to life
than feelings. And that there is more to life than therapy. They seem to have
taken the opposite tack-- believing that she will never date a man who does not
belong to her own therapy cult.
As the dust settles, I’m wondering: Is it okay for
me to categorically state that I will never again bind my life to someone who
hasn’t been through therapy? I know therapy may not be for everyone on earth,
but I’ve yet to see an alternative that is rigorous and practical. If I do move
forward with that belief, I have to acknowledge that my dating pool will be
almost comically small.
Friends say I just need to get over this one; we
all fall in love again. And sure, maybe one day I’ll fall so madly in love with
someone that I’m able to overlook the warning signs of their emotional
avoidance. But I’m not sure I actually want that to happen. Nothing feels more
important to me than being able to honor the full spectrum of my big,
inconvenient, and complex feelings for the rest of my life, without any shame
or suppression — even if that means I have to do that while steering my own
ship.
Am I the Avoidant One?
Say what? Nothing feels more important than honoring her all
of her feelings. She feels her feelings. She has detached from the real world.
She is hardly ready to engage with any real human beings, no less any real male
human beings.
If she or anyone else considers this a success-- except as cult recruitment-- they should all get a refund from their therapists.
This makes me want to get down on my knees and thank G-d I married a woman who is normal.
ReplyDeleteMy guess is she is above average attractive and at 30 still think she has some pretty good options so my hope is that any man she meets sees the warning signs and run
ReplyDeleteIt’ll be a cinch for her to find a new companion. If, like me, she’s in the U.K., I can gladly give her directions to Battersea Cats and Dogs home.
ReplyDeleteA woman marries a man and then hopes to change him.
ReplyDeleteA man marries a woman and hopes she won't change
Couples therapy is because the woman can't quite seem to change the ma to what she wants and needs help.
Well said.
Delete"I live in the U.K., and I’m struck by the fact that a significant number of women I know are in some form of this exact relationship dynamic: emotionally avoidant men..." Welllll, these men are English! Stiff upper lips are de rigueur.
ReplyDelete