Friday, July 26, 2024

Verena's Case, Part II

This is the second half of the case fiction I wrote about last Friday.

Listening with more than his usual attentiveness, Horace was alert to the idea of an inability to love. Surely, it was one of the great shibboleths of modern psychotherapy. Taking it to be a panacea had boxed Verena in. 


Horace knew that love was not a redemptive salve that would magically solve all of Verena’s problems. From the time of Freud therapists had rationalized their obsessive focus on libido and desire by declaring that the goal of treatment, the meaning of life, and the incontestable sign of mental health was the ability to love. Of course, they meant erotic and romantic love; they did not mean Christian agape.


Therapists often declared their patient cured when said individuals fell in love. There was a fairy tale quality to the story, not entirely inappropriate if the technique wanted to turn life into a comedy. Yet, Freud’s vision was relentlessly tragic. He was not about happy endings. 


Horace decided to broach the central issue: “You believe in love; you are looking for a man who will love you despite your past. And you expect that this true love will cleanse your sins.” Didn’t true love mean accepting one’s beloved, warts and all?


Verena was listening quietly and made no move to respond. So Horace continued. “I suspect that you have had feelings of love, somehow, sometime, somewhere. Convincing yourself that you are incapable of love diminishes you as a human being. You seem to see yourself as a sexual acrobat, a fetishist who can only deploy libido when no affection or fellow-feeling is involved. In most circumstances that describes male more than female behavior.”


Verena ignored it all. She kept to her beliefs: “I have never fallen in love and I believe that the reason is, I did not have a father. I want to understand how this abnormal circumstance affected me.”


Horace changed tactics. “Doubtless there is truth in your observation, but focusing on your absent father is a counsel of despair. It still seems unlikely to me that you have never felt love for anyone. And I think it highly unlikely that no one has ever loved you. This does not mean that you noticed or cared, but I suspect that love has not been as absent as you think.


“I suspect that the issue involves reciprocity. You might have felt love for some people; some people might have felt love for you. Yet, the feelings did not harmonize. You did not love someone who loved you, and vice versa. For all I know, you feared falling in love with someone who also loved you.”


To which Verena replied: “Why would anyone be afraid of falling in love?”


Horace ended the session by suggesting that if she were in love she might no longer recognize herself. And she might feel a yearning for domesticity, thus betraying her mother. Worse yet, it would make her feel more like a woman. 


To that remark Verena took some serious offense. When she engaged in sexual activity she felt perfectly like a woman. She had no doubts about her sexual identity. She was starting to believe that Horace was missing the point. Not that she was surprised.


For his part Horace persevered. He suggested that they draw a difference between what she felt when she was alone with a man, indulging all manner of sexual release, and when she was out in public with a man who would be identified as her beau or even husband.


A wave of anxiety threatened to drown Verena. She turned a different color and asked for a glass of water. For his part Horace was thinking that he had discovered something important.


Once she regained her composure Verena declared that she had a vision of being attached to a man, within a defined relationship, and introducing him to her mother. Worse yet, having dinner with said mother.


It was not merely that the situation was unfamiliar and thus threatening. She knew that she would not only be hurting her mother, but she would be putting said man in a position where her mother might very well treat him with contempt.


Obviously, Verena had never been on a dinner date. She had never accepted an invitation to the theatre. She had never needed to organize her life as a function of someone else, and she was certain that she would fail at the task. 


Even if she succeeded, she would feel strange being associated with a man within a relationship. It’s one thing to pick up a man in a bar, take him home, have carnal relations with him, and discard him like so much used trash. It is quite another to organize your life as a function of another human being, to assume the new role, whether of girlfriend, or heaven forfend, even of wife. 


And then there was the problem of including or not including him in different activities. Besides, if she presented him as her beau, she would be defining herself in a decidedly feminine position.


If she did so and the relationship failed, she would be facing the unenviable task of explaining to friends and family what went wrong. For a woman who had succeeded at everything she had undertaken, the idea of failing at love was almost too much to bear.


Worse yet, Verena had never been on a proper date. She had never made an appointment to spend an evening with a man, to meet him somewhere, to enjoy dinner and/or a play and then to go home. She did not merely have no relationship skills. She had no dating skills either.


After all, if the purpose of any meeting is a hookup, you do not need any dating skills. You do not even need to know the other person’s name. Nor do you need to divulge your own.


It was as though Verena had missed out on adolescence. And yet, if she started dating now, she would probably be so awkward that she would seem to be fake.


If she were not pretending to be fake, she would still need to repress her effulgent personality. She could not overpower a date with her wonderfulness and expect to be asked on another date.


In addition, no one really went on dates any more. As Verena continued to think about the task at hand, she was becoming increasingly anxious.


As for her feeling awkward about playing a more feminine role, the truth is, Horace shared, that men do not mind-- awkward. They are effectively suspicious when a woman is too experienced. If such is the case, they start thinking: “Where did she learn that?” and cross her off the marriageable list.


And yet, for someone who has developed the habits of taking charge, the challenge not to take charge would be a challenge. It would require some serious repression, and Verena was not very confident she could do it.


Worse yet, Horace suggested that she could transition into dating by forswearing sex for a time. This was hardly an original idea. A British writer, by name of Hephzibah Anderson had done as much and had chronicled her experience in a book called: Chastened


Surely, this did not preclude flirting, but it would impose strict boundaries on sexual activity. Horace was explaining that removing quick hookups from the equation would cause Verena to modify her behavior. It would also signal to her male admirers that she was looking for a permanent relationship, not just a one-night-stand. 


Verena thought that this advice was very bad indeed. She was unwilling to picture herself waiting at home for a man to call and to ask her out. Wasn’t she perfectly capable of taking an initiative?


And that was before she would need to learn different behaviors. How should she behave in restaurants when her date wanted to pay the bill? What about those theatre tickets, the ones he might lavish on her?


If she allows a man to take an initiative and to take control of a dating situation he would certainly feel that she owed him something in return. 


Verena listened politely to Horace’s idea. She was certainly not happy to hear it. She could not imagine herself functioning the way he was describing. She could not imagine herself introducing a boyfriend, no less a husband, to her mother. She thought that Horace was a relic from a distant past, one that young people like Verena had outgrown some time ago.


She was thinking that if she had to choose between living a loveless life and dealing with people like Horace, the former was suddenly seeming to be more appealing. She started thinking that consulting with an older male coach was a decidedly bad idea.


She did not come this far in life to become a tool of the patriarchy. So, she expressed herself openly to Horace, who was prepared.


“Consider this,” he suggested, “in the old days women refused to engage in carnal relations until they had exchanged marriage vows. An appalling practice, but sufficiently commonplace. It meant that women required that a man make a public commitment to them before they had conjugal relations. Were these women-- tools of the patriarchy?”


“Of course, they were,” Verena interjected. She explained her heartfelt belief that the marriage ceremony was akin to being sold into chattel slavery. In the old days a married woman would become a wife, and that meant that she was her husband’s property. He could do whatever he wanted to her. She had no right to object or refuse. She might even be induced to give up her name, and to take her husband’s name.


Horace had heard this before. Despite the feminist attack on marriage, women still wanted to be married. If they had obligations to their husbands, their husbands also had obligations to them.


So Horace, being slightly too glib for anyone’s own good, replied: Yes, modern women keep their fathers’ names, and they consider it a blow against patriarchy. Why didn’t I think of that?”


Dare we say, none of this made Verena very happy. Horace was challenging her most deeply held beliefs, to the point where she felt that the best course would be to fire him.


Before she had the chance to tell him what she really thought, he proposed something new. He was not going to spend time with her discussing theoretical abstractions. It would lead them nowhere.


Instead, he offered an experiment. What if Verena tried changing the way she was conducting her dating life? What if she refrained from asking any man out on a date and also refrained from hooking up with a man she had just met? What if she started developing the habit of accepting invitations to go out on dates. 


Admittedly, the only way to learn how to be pursued is to be pursued. And what if she simply refrained from sexual relations, until she had established a true connection with a man. Would she need to be committed, or would she retreat to the local feminist coven, to hear about why men were dastardly oppressive creatures.


Anyway, Verena said that she would think it over. In time she decided that she would try out Horace’s experiment. She did not think it was a very good idea, but it was something new. And, if it did not work, she could blame him,


The work is now in progress. I will report further when there is more to report.


Please subscribe to my Substack, for free or preferably for a fee.


I now have several free consulting hours for my life coaching practice. If you are interesting, please contact me via email at StuartSchneiderman@gmail.com





Thursday, July 25, 2024

Raising Funds

 Time flies, or, as the old saying goes, tempus fugit. 

Anniversaries are normally celebrated, and I am happy to invite everyone, especially those who have not done so before, to offer some financial support to the blog. It’s not just a good cause; it’s a great cause.


It seems like only yesterday, but for slightly more than sixteen years I have been writing my blog, Had Enough Therapy? 


Obviously, it takes time and effort to do the job, and I could not have done it without the financial support of you, my readers.


I try to make my writing sound effortless, and, as the old saying goes, it takes a lot of work to make anything seem effortless.


The internet is awash in blogs. I am grateful to those who have chosen to spend a small part of their days reading mine. I have tried to be worthy of their confidence, by presenting reflections and analysis that are unlikely to be found elsewhere. 


If you would like to express your gratitude by donating please make use of the Paypal button on this page. If you prefer, you can mail a check to 310 East 46th St. 24H. New York, NY 10017.


If you have already donated, please pass the word along to your friends, family, associates and colleagues.


Thank  you in advance.

Feminist Misogyny

Imagine a misogynistic culture, the patriarchy on steroids. It forces women to cover their hair, lest they be murdered. It practices honor killings, child marriage, wife beating and wife rape. As for homosexuality, of both varieties, this culture considers it a capital crime and will murder you if it catches you engaging in it.

I will not name the culture in question. You know what I am talking about. And yet, imagine what feminists would have to say about such a cultural deformity.


In truth, we know exactly what modern feminists, modern liberated women, have to say about Islamist culture. They embrace it. They go to the barricades to defend it. They march in the streets and set up encampments to further its cause. 


I cannot promise you that the women who are out manifesting for a free Palestine and who want to eliminate Jews from the Middle East are feminists, actual or incipient, but I do not think it’s a great stretch to see that these women, seeking freedom for the poor oppressed people of Gaza, do not care a whit for the oppressed women in Gaza. And that is assuming that they know what life is like for women in those places.


Or else, if we were going to be slightly more cynical, we might say that these deluded feminists are giving voice to a basic and fundamental misogyny that undergirds their belief system. I have long suspected that feminism is merely a stealth misogyny. The level of female participation in the pro-Palestinian movement gives the point plausibility.


Kay Hymowitz identifies one simple but undeniable fact. The anti-Israeli and pro-Hamas demonstrations are being led by women. It’s girlpower on the march:


It was women holding the microphones, addressing the press and crowds; women leading the chants of “From the river to the sea”; women giving interviews about the encampments; and women issuing demands to university administrators. In some images, so many women were involved that it seemed as if men had inexplicably vanished, like the missing in the sci-fi series The Leftovers.


Obviously, those women who promote gay rights have no clue about the condition of homosexuals in Islamist cultures:


 Reporting by Joseph Bernstein in the New York Times revealed that shortly after October 7, a Columbia lesbian group, LionLez, sent an e-mail letting Zionists know they were unwelcome at an upcoming event. Similarly, a Barnard hip-hop dance team removed a four-year veteran, an Israeli American, from its WhatsApp channel, where practices and events were announced.


So, Hymowitz asks the right question:


Why would Gen Z college women like Grosso, who have “never hit or harmed” anyone in their lives, align themselves with Hamas, a terror group so proud of its capacity for sadistic rape and murder that it filmed some of its October 7 atrocities to share with the world?


These young people do not understand what they are doing. They do not care about women being subjected to gang rapes, or to having their children murdered before their eyes. When you tell them that Hamas terrorists were shoving grenades into women’s genitals, then to explode them, they will tell you either that it never happened or that the Israeli Zionist settlers deserved it.


Of course, there are now films about Hamas violence against women. In truth, the warriors of Hamas took the films themselves and were happy to distribute them. 


The sad and the inexcusable part is that Western feminists hear about these atrocities against women and shrug. They do not have enough moral sense to identify the actions of the terrorists as war crimes. 


War criminals are not freedom fighters. They are not working to have a free society where men and women can have equal rights.


The women protesters have invariably and inevitably been spoon fed feminist ideology. How does it happen that feminism dulls their moral sense at a such  fundamental level.


Of course, if we look for the root cause of modern feminism, we need but look at the work of one Friedrich Engels, the No. 2 Communist roader. Engels wanted to enlist women in the cause, to help them to abandon their bourgeois dreams in order to join the vanguard of the revolution. Dare we say that he has had some considerable success.


A young woman who lives according to the precepts of feminism will inevitably make a mess of her life. And then she will discover a coven of feminists that will happily explain to her that the patriarchy is at fault and that she should give her life over to the task of overthrowing it.


Ultimately, if women do not become miserable by thinking as feminists, acting as feminists… they will consider that they have been doing something wrong. If they do become miserable they will have been taught by feminists to blame it all on men.


Before you know it they are marching in the streets, burning American flags, in order to show solidarity with misogynist terrorists who have no use for women or for human rights.


Please subscribe to my Substack, for free or preferably for a fee.



Wednesday, July 24, 2024

Wednesday Potpourri

First, the nation’s media pundits have had their knickers in a twist-- to borrow a charming British phrase-- over the chance that President Biden is no longer among the living.

Alas, it was not true.


Having spent nearly four years lying about Biden’s mental capacity, these mini-thinkers woke up one day to see that the ruse was no longer plausible. They saw Biden debate Trump and were horrified to see their lies exposed.


So now, in order to save democracy-- which is code for the Democratic party-- the leaders of that political party have anointed Kamala Harris, the ultimate diversity hire. Or, shall we call her cackling Kamala.


Joel Kotkin, a Democrat, takes the measure of the shift:


With the ascension of Kamala Harris, the Democrats have made a full break from their historic roots as the party of workers and have gravitated towards the decidedly post-industrial politics of California-style progressives. Rather than worrying primarily about lifting up living standards, the party’s emphasis will now be on issues like climate change, abortion, reparations and trans advocacy.


Second, in her first official action as the new presidential candidate, Kamala Harris will boycott a speech delivered to Congress today by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. 


The presiding officer of the Senate will join the pro-Hamas Congresspeople in showing their opposition to the Jewish state.


Everyone knows that Harris’s husband is supposedly Jewish-- though he cannot really define what Hanukkah is. And everyone knows that Harris’s step daughter, Ella Emhof, has been militating for the Palestinian cause.


Third, the Washington Free Beacon names one group that is happy to see the ascent of Kamala-- anti-Israel government employees:


Anti-Israel radicals who resigned their government posts over President Joe Biden's support for Israel are betting on Vice President Kamala Harris to adopt more hardline policies toward the Jewish state. It's a good bet: Harris throughout her vice presidency touted her public opposition to Israel's war on Hamas and praised campus protesters who have violently harassed Jews.


In December, just two months after Hamas slaughtered more than 1,200 Jews, Harris publicly broke with Biden's support for Israel, saying the Jewish state had killed "too many innocent Palestinians" and "must do more to protect innocent civilians."


Since that time, the vice president has repeatedly thrown her support behind anti-Israel protesters in America, saying they show "exactly what the human emotion should be, as a response to Gaza." 


For instance,


In 2021 speech at George Washington U Harris calls Israel Iron Dome “Ethnic Genocide”.


If one were to be charitable one would remark that perhaps Harris does not know that the Iron Dome is a purely defensive system. Or perhaps she is as stupid as people think she is.


One understands that candidate Harris will appeal to Muslim voters. We will see how liberal Jews vote.


Fourth, speaking of Prime Minister Netanyahu, he is scheduled to visit with Donald Trump in Palm Beach this Friday.


Fifth, Los Angeles police officer Deon Joseph made the case against Kamala on Twitter. His words are worth weighing:


I’m going to make my stance abundantly clear. I don’t care who she slept with. Don’t care about her laugh, I am not going to dehumanize her or disrespect her based on her personal life. Who doesn’t have a past and she is grown. Don’t care if she is too Black for some and not Black enough for others. 


My decision not to even consider her is based solely on the following: - She created a bail fund for rioters in 2020 who destroyed cities to push a politics agenda. That is terrorism and she helped them skate instead of condemning them. - She supported two propositions in CA that exacerbated crime and made it incredibly difficult to for law enforcement to stop crime. 


As well as No Cash Bail, even against the will of California voters. Which also put Californians in danger. - She was tasked with solving the border crisis. She only went to the border because she was pressured and all she did was peek at it to find “root causes”. 


Which is progressive code for “I ain’t gonna do … about this.” - She engages in race baiting and fear mongering. Which lets me know she has zero solutions to the many issues American’s are facing right now. - She is even farther left than Joe Biden. 


That’s why. I don’t believe she is ready to lead and her politics will slide America further down the crapper. Not because she is a woman. I would gladly and without pause vote for a woman for president. Some of the greatest leaders I ever worked for were women. Just can’t vote for this one because of who she, is not her gender. Has nothing to do with her race. I’m always proud when I see Black people elevate. I don’t just want any Black person. I don’t care about color when it comes to leadership. I just want the leader best capable to lead.


Sixth, meanwhile the border czar allowed millions of illegals to flood the nation. Sanctuary cities, caught in their virtue signaling, are going broke trying to deal with the people.


And, of course, average citizens are paying the price by being the victims of crime.


The New York Post reports:


Rape surges 11% in NYC — as bail reform, vulnerable migrants, depleted NYPD create perfect crime storm 


Seventh, remember all of the stories about how we are going to decouple from China-- and how we were going to onshore manufacturing. It is not a partisan issue, since Republicans and Democrats both believe that this is the best path to the future.


People who know something about the issues have tried to shed some light on the problem.


David Goldman quoted the chairman of Raytheon, for example:


"Greg Hayes, chief executive of Raytheon, said the company had 'several thousand suppliers in China and decoupling . . . is impossible.' 'We can de-risk but not decouple,' Hayes told the Financial Times in an interview, adding that he believed this to be the case 'for everybody.' 'Think about the $500bn of trade that goes from China to the US every year. More than 95 percent of rare earth materials or metals come from, or are processed in, China. There is no alternative,' said Hayes. 'If we had to pull out of China, it would take us many many years to re-establish that capability either domestically or in other friendly countries.'


Eighth, the Director of the Secret Service, Kimberly Cheatle, has resigned.


One is heartened that the Congressional hearing yesterday saw a significant and solid unanimity of opinion. Strangely, the representatives were of one mind about Cheatle’s failures. 


Ninth, remember when the Biden administration declared that it was going to deal with the Houthi rebels in Yemen. Since this rogue Iranian proxy had shut down shipping in the Red Sea, the Biden administration declared that it was going to open it back up.


The Wall Street Journal editorial page brings us up to date.


The bombing exchange between the Houthis of Yemen and Israel over the weekend isn’t merely another military escalation in the Middle East. It represents the failure of the Biden Administration’s policy of appeasement to contain the Iran-backed Houthis as they terrorize commercial shipping in the Red Sea, Israel and the U.S. Navy.


The Biden Administration told Israel nine months ago that the U.S. would handle the Houthi threat and it should stick to playing defense. But the attack on Tel Aviv shows that the U.S. effort is a bust.


The Houthis have all but shut down Western shipping in the Red Sea, at enormous cost to global businesses and consumers. They continue to attack U.S. naval vessels, which have been forced to play a high-stakes game of catch the drones and missiles. That one or more haven’t killed sailors and damaged ships is a tribute to U.S. naval training and technology. But sooner or later one might get through and result in American casualties.


But, the weak and feeble Biden administration is afraid of offending Iran, and surely afraid of undermining their great hope, for a nuclear deal.


So, they have gone soft. They have appeased. Only the Israelis stood up to Yemen.


They know Iran is the Houthis’ supplier and terror master, and that the U.S. would have to hurt Iran militarily to make enough of a deterrent impression. That would probably mean sinking much of Iran’s navy. Mr. Biden and his political advisers are afraid such a U.S. response would lead to Iranian escalation and more fighting before the U.S. election.


Tenth, from the satirical Babylon Bee, an obvious point that everyone has been making:


Donald Trump Will Destroy Democracy,' Says Party Nominating Candidate No One Voted For 


Then again, if you believed the hype about threats to democracy you deserve whatever opprobrium you receive.


Eleventh, as for the qualifications that cackling Kamala brings to the job-- count this: no one wants to work for her. Staff turnover at her office is apparently a world record.


Open the Books site offers this:


That’s not hyperbole from the national media. Our auditors at OpenTheBooks quantified an extraordinarily high 91.5-percent staff turnover rate. We used U.S. Senate disclosures to conduct our investigation and those databases can be downloaded below.

Elected in November 2020, Harris took the oath of office in January 2021. As of March 31, 2024, only four of the initial 47 staffers from the first year are still employed – consistently and without interruption – by the Vice President.


Furthermore, the turnover chaos isn’t getting better. In the trailing 12-month period, 24 staffers left — that’s almost half the employees.


Please subscribe to my Substack, for free or preferably for a fee.

Tuesday, July 23, 2024

The Wit and Wisdom of Kamala Harris

Think about it: President Kamala Harris. If that does not scare you nothing will.

As of now, Harris is known for her rank incompetence, her inability to do any job she is assigned and her failure to hold on to staff. Apparently, she is impossible to work for.


But, she is also known for her unintelligible word salads. These happen when she is not talking from cue cards. The mindless mumbo jumbo has embarrassed her, has embarrassed the country and has inspired The Daily Mail to offer a diagnosis.


We do not diagnose. And we are not going to start now. It could be the case that Kamala is just plain stupid. It happens. Obviously, she did not get to where she got to by exercising her negligible intelligence.


Consider this, uttered at a meeting she was chairing:


I am Kamala Harris, my pronouns are she and her, and I am a woman sitting at the table wearing a blue suit.


Was she reminding herself or was she reminding her audience.


It gets worse:


Some of her most infamous speeches have included ones about the 'significance of the passage of time' and the 'need to get to go and need to be able to get where you need to go'.


And she made this comment in a speech in Louisiana: 


The governor and I we were all doing a tour of the library here and talking about the significance of the passage of time.


Are you ready to be enlightened?


So, when you think about it, there is great significance to the passage of time in terms of what we need to do to lay these wires, what we need to do to create these jobs.


And there is such great significance to the passage of time when we think about a day in the life of our children.


And a few words about historical context:


I think it's very important...for us at every moment in time and certainly this one, to see the moment in time in which we exist and are present, and to be able to contextualise it, to understand where we exist in the history and in the moment as it relates not only to the past but the future.'


Last March, she asserted that, during Women's History Month, 'we celebrate and we honour the women who made history throughout history, who saw what could be unburdened by what had been.'


'My mother used to — she would give us a hard time sometimes, and she would say to us, “I don’t know what’s wrong with you young people. You think you just fell out of a coconut tree?” she said, laughing. 'You exist in the context of all in which you live and what came before you.'


Astonishingly, the grandees of the Democratic Party are lining up to support Kamala Harris. Apparently, they could not find anyone who was more stupid and more incompetent.


Consider the chance that she will be representing America on the world stage. It’s one thing to have a bunch of refugees from the old age home running things. It’s quite another to offer up the ultimate DEI hire, a woman who has never manifested the qualities needed to function as president. Sadly, DEI has not yet finished damaging the country.


Rather than limit ourselves to her illiteracy, we can point out the fine work she did in bringing peace to Ukraine. Remember the Munich Security Conference from early 2022.


Stephen Green recalls it well:


Called "the most critical foreign trip of her vice presidency," Harris helmed the U.S. delegation to the 2022 Munich Security Conference while Biden hit the beach in Delaware. She was accompanied by Secretary of State Antony Blinken but as CNN [linked above] indicated, Harris was to be the star of the show.


Harris assured Europe and the world that sanctions would deter Russia but also contradicted herself, saying that Russian strongman Vladimir Putin had already made up his mind to invade. "Within the context then of the fact that that window is still opening, altho- — open, although it is absolutely narrowing," Harris said at the time. "But within the context of a diplomatic path still being open, the deterrence effect, we believe, has merit."


Not exactly Churchill, is she? Or even either of the Bushes; take your pick. By most accounts, Harris doesn't do her homework and takes it out on staffers when she flubs in public — or helps start a war.


Less than 48 hours after Harris's word salad was dressed and tossed, Putin ordered the full-scale invasion.


And, I do not need to remind you of the joke called the Border Czar.


As for portraits, consider this from novelist Lionel Shriver.


 She’s an intellectual lightweight — and I’m being polite. She cannot think on her feet. I’ve never heard her say anything original or observant; at her best, she simply recites the party line. At her worst, she’s too lazy to memorise the party line, for she has a history of not bothering to do her homework before official appearances. Much like Jill Biden, she often resorts to the persona of a kindergarten teacher. She comes across as a fake, and most voters — most people, even children — are keenly attuned to artifice. (Trump is an asshole, but at least he’s genuinely an asshole.) She has a reputation as personally unpleasant, helping to explain why she’s run through staff like disposable cutlery.


Alas, Kamala is a walking embarrassment. If Joe Biden embarrassed the country by looking like a fool in meetings with world leaders, consider how much worse it will be when we have the giggling, cackling Kamala representing the nation.


The loss of national pride will be considerable. How can you continue to feel pride in being the citizen of a great nation when that nation extols a semi-literate imbecile and elevates her to candidate for the president of the United States. In the meantime stock up on your anti-depressants.


Please subscribe to my Substack, for free or preferably for a fee.


Monday, July 22, 2024

Raising Funds

Time flies, or, as the old saying goes, tempus fugit. 

Anniversaries are normally celebrated, and I am happy to invite everyone, especially those who have not done so before, to offer some financial support to the blog. It’s not just a good cause; it’s a great cause.


It seems like only yesterday, but for slightly more than sixteen years I have been writing my blog, Had Enough Therapy? 


Obviously, it takes time and effort to do the job, and I could not have done it without the financial support of you, my readers.


I try to make my writing sound effortless, and, as the old saying goes, it takes a lot of work to make anything seem effortless.


The internet is awash in blogs. I am grateful to those who have chosen to spend a small part of their days reading mine. I have tried to be worthy of their confidence, by presenting reflections and analysis that are unlikely to be found elsewhere. 


If you would like to express your gratitude by donating please make use of the Paypal button on this page. If you prefer, you can mail a check to 310 East 46th St. 24H. New York, NY 10017.


If you have already donated, please pass the word along to your friends, family, associates and colleagues.


Thank  you in advance.