Sunday, June 14, 2020

Anonymous Speaks Truth to Black Lives Matter

This letter, written by an anonymous history professor at the University of California, Berkeley is one of the best essays on Black Live Matter and the current anti-racist hysteria.

The author chose to remain anonymous because the current cultural climate makes it impossible to speak truth to Black Lives Matter… and to retain one’s job.

So, I will present his arguments, beginning with his dismay at the failure of his department to tolerate a diversity of opinion:

In your recent departmental emails you mentioned our pledge to diversity, but I am increasingly alarmed by the absence of diversity of opinion on the topic of the recent protests and our community response to them. In the extended links and resources you provided, I could not find a single instance of substantial counter-argument or alternative narrative to explain the under-representation of black individuals in academia or their over-representation in the criminal justice system. The explanation provided in your documentation, to the near exclusion of all others, is univariate: the problems of the black community are caused by whites, or, when whites are not physically present, by the infiltration of white supremacy and white systemic racism into American brains, souls, and institutions.

Blaming white for everything that is going wrong in the black community is, the author explains, bigoted. Not only is it bigoted it denudes blacks of all responsibility for their condition and makes them solely dependent on white people:

The claim that the difficulties that the black community faces are entirely causally explained by exogenous factors in the form of white systemic racism, white supremacy, and other forms of white discrimination remains a problematic hypothesis that should be vigorously challenged by historians. Instead, it is being treated as an axiomatic and actionable truth without serious consideration of its profound flaws, or its worrying implication of total black impotence. 

I would point out that this theory has much in common with Black Liberation Theology, the theory that Rev. Jeremiah Wright poured into his protege, Barack Obama, for two decades. Naturally, you are naive enough to believe that Obama tossed aside this indoctrination with a twenty minute speech. If so, you really need some serious thought reform.

So, our historian asks why it happens that so many young black men are incarcerated. And he offers an interesting argument: because males, in general, are far more likely to be incarcerated than females. Does this mean that the penal justice system is misandrist?

The BLM protesters insist that it is the fault of white policemen. If you think otherwise you will be canceled:

As an example of the latter problem, consider the proportion of black incarcerated Americans. This proportion is often used to characterize the criminal justice system as anti-black. However, if we use the precise same methodology, we would have to conclude that the criminal justice system is even more anti-male than it is anti-black.

Black people are not incarcerated at higher rates than their involvement in violent crime would predict. This fact has been demonstrated multiple times across multiple jurisdictions in multiple countries. And yet, I see my department uncritically reproducing a narrative that diminishes black agency in favor of a white-centric explanation that appeals to the department’s apparent desire to shoulder the ‘white man’s burden’ and to promote a narrative of white guilt.

Yes, indeed, the whole idea is to produce more and more white guilt. The argument does not hold up to scrutiny:

If we claim that the criminal justice system is white-supremacist, why is it that Asian Americans, Indian Americans, and Nigerian Americans are incarcerated at vastly lower rates than white Americans? This is a funny sort of white supremacy. Even Jewish Americans are incarcerated less than gentile whites. I think it’s fair to say that your average white supremacist disapproves of Jews. And yet, these alleged white supremacists incarcerate gentiles at vastly higher rates than Jews.

Well argued… though you will most likely to be shocked that these salient and reasonable points have never been aired in the national conversation.

Besides, Anonymous continues, most victims of black crime are black. About that BLM has nothing to say:

The vast majority of violence visited on the black community is committed by black people. There are virtually no marches for these invisible victims, no public silences, no heartfelt letters from the UC regents, deans, and departmental heads. The message is clear: Black lives only matter when whites take them. Black violence is expected and insoluble, while white violence requires explanation and demands solution.

It is not only ignorant. It is raw bigotry:

Please look into your hearts and see how monstrously bigoted this formulation truly is. No discussion is permitted for non-black victims of black violence, who proportionally outnumber black victims of non-black violence. This is especially bitter in the Bay Area, where Asian victimization by black assailants has reached epidemic proportions, to the point that the SF police chief has advised Asians to stop hanging good-luck charms on their doors, as this attracts the attention of (overwhelmingly black) home invaders. Home invaders like George Floyd.

Anonymous proceeds to take down the argument that today’s black crime is the result of slavery and redlining:

The claim that black interracial violence is the product of redlining, slavery, and other injustices is a largely historical claim. It is for historians, therefore, to explain why Japanese internment or the massacre of European Jewry hasn’t led to equivalent rates of dysfunction and low SES performance among Japanese and Jewish Americans respectively. Arab Americans have been viciously demonized since 9/11, as have Chinese Americans more recently. However, both groups outperform white Americans on nearly all SES indices – as do Nigerian Americans, who incidentally have black skin. It is for historians to point out and discuss these anomalies. 

And he remarks the rank hypocrisy of the corporations who have rushed out to support BLM:

The total alliance of major corporations involved in human exploitation with BLM should be a warning flag to us, and yet this damning evidence goes unnoticed, purposefully ignored, or perversely celebrated. We are the useful idiots of the wealthiest classes, carrying water for Jeff Bezos and other actual, real, modern-day slavers. Starbucks, an organisation using literal black slaves in its coffee plantation suppliers, is in favor of BLM. Sony, an organisation using cobalt mined by yet more literal black slaves, many of whom are children, is in favor of BLM. And so, apparently, are we. The absence of counter-narrative enables this obscenity. 

Anonymous adds a further point, one that no one seems to have reported-- the shame of the media, incidentally-- namely that George Floyd, despite the fact that he was murdered, was not a choir boy or even a saint:

As a final point, our university and department has made multiple statements celebrating and eulogizing George Floyd. Floyd was a multiple felon who once held a pregnant black woman at gunpoint. He broke into her home with a gang of men and pointed a gun at her pregnant stomach. He terrorized the women in his community. He sired and abandoned multiple children, playing no part in their support or upbringing, failing one of the most basic tests of decency for a human being. He was a drug-addict and sometime drug-dealer, a swindler who preyed upon his honest and hard-working neighbors. And yet, the regents of UC and the historians of the UCB History department are celebrating this violent criminal, elevating his name to virtual sainthood. A man who hurt women. A man who hurt black women. With the full collaboration of the UCB history department, corporate America, most mainstream media outlets, and some of the wealthiest and most privileged opinion-shaping elites of the USA, he has become a culture hero, buried in a golden casket, his (recognized) family showered with gifts and praise.

The dominant narrative works to undermine black achievement by undermining black motivation. Blaming other people for everything that has ever gone wrong for you is demoralizing. Anonymous weighs the psychological consequences:

The ever-present soft bigotry of low expectations and the permanent claim that the solutions to the plight of my people rest exclusively on the goodwill of whites rather than on our own hard work is psychologically devastating. No other group in America is systematically demoralized in this way by its alleged allies. A whole generation of black children are being taught that only by begging and weeping and screaming will they get handouts from guilt-ridden whites.

5 comments:

Sam L. said...

I recall reading, some years back, that some time in the '50s or '60s, our government decided to sprinkle money on black women raising children without fathers. Raising them WITH fathers, no money sprinkled. Dry, dusty times...

Anonymous said...

Sam L. -

"I recall reading, some years back, that some time in the '50s or '60s, our government decided to sprinkle money on black women raising children without fathers..."


>>>what is NY Sen. "Daniel Patrick Moynihan" for $500, Alex.


-shoe

Anonymous said...

There are 2 groups in North America with the most problems in integrating. And both these groups have what I might term a civilizations poverty. I mean that, in comparison to the currently dominant western culture, descendants of the North American aboriginals and the sub-Saharan Africans have no real history of civilizational achievement in the light of western thought and technological development.

Immigrants from China know they have 5000 years of history behind them. People from India come from a culture of significant intellectual and spiritual attainments. Italians know they are backed by the history of the Roman Empire. Iranians had the Persian Empire. The list goes on and on. But the aboriginals in North America (and Australia) and sub-Saharan Africans have no deep anchor in western culture. So they try to fit in, know that "we didn't build that".

Don't know if there is any solution other than to try and encourage the blacks to work from the present, do their best and realize that a lot of their problems are mental programming. If they can't get the software right, then building night time basketball courts and throwing money at projects and single mamas is never ever going to get them going.

UbuMaccabee said...

The grandees at UC Berkeley must be mad with rage at this imposter who has betrayed their dogmatic uniformity. They will not waste one moment replying to the charges. But they will spend a fortune to uncover this revanchist traitor in their midst. I just cannot believe that such a man such as this should even exist in the California University system. They’ll find him, and ruin him.

They called Moynihan a racist when he published his warning. Imagine what they would do to him now.

Anonymous said...

Tammly

As a final point, our university and department has made multiple statements celebrating and eulogizing George Floyd. Floyd was a multiple felon who once held a pregnant black woman at gunpoint. He broke into her home with a gang of men and pointed a gun at her pregnant stomach. He terrorized the women in his community. He sired and abandoned multiple children, playing no part in their support or upbringing, failing one of the most basic tests of decency for a human being. He was a drug-addict and sometime drug-dealer, a swindler who preyed upon his honest and hard-working neighbors

Reminds me strongly of another figure beyond criticism one Mohamad. Didn't he found a new religion some time ago in the Middle East?