Saturday, December 2, 2017

Donation Saturday

Being as this is a conservative blog, I try to respect tradition. Even my own invented traditions. Like asking for donations during the week after Thanksgiving.

It might not seem like it, but it takes considerable work to produce these posts every day. For those who wish to support and even reward my efforts I recommend a donation. It’s thoroughly in keeping with the holiday spirit. As they say: It's more blessed to give than to receive.

If you click on the orange Donate button on the left side of this page, the kind folks at Paypal will help you to contribute as much as you would like.

If you do not wish to use Paypal, I gratefully accept checks or cash or even Bitcoin sent to my address:

                   310 East 46th St. 24H
                   New York, NY   10017

If you have a friend or a relative who is a psychoanalyst or who still clings to Freudian theory, you would be doing him a great favor by sending a copy of my book, The Last Psychoanalyst. It’s the perfect holiday gift. See the link at left.

Thank you in advance.

A Disillusioned Young Feminist

A recently minted college graduate, from Stanford no less, Lila Thulin spent her academic years absorbing the feminist party line. Watching the current wave of sexual harassment and sexual assault charges, she is beginning to become disillusioned about what she was taught. Could it be that feminists were selling a fantasy, a fiction? Could it be that feminists had lied to her?

Thulin doesn’t exactly say that feminists have lied. But she does dramatize her disillusionment… promises made and promises unkept.

She writes:

Before I entered the workplace, I’d worn my certainty about the accomplishments of second-wave feminism like a bulletproof jacket. Now the reality of the working world I was confronting bore little resemblance to the one I’d been promised by all the cheerleading feminism I’d encountered on campus. By the time I graduated, it was common practice to read aloud a definition of consent before gaining entry to an all-campus party, and calling for more stringent Title IX policy was a familiar activist rallying cry. Sparkly “Of course I’m a feminist” decals adorned laptops and water bottles, loudly and proudly declaring our convictions. We changed the wording on the neon tank tops worn by roaming sober monitors at a wacky, raucous kiss-a-stranger school tradition from “Kiss me, I’m sober” to “Ask to kiss me, I’m sober” to avoid even the insinuation that nonconsensual mouth-mashing was OK. But amidst all this talk of how to stamp out sexual assault and harassment on campus, all our smash-the-patriarchy conviction, I don’t remember having a single conversation that projected these questions onto my hypothetical future workplace.

Be clear about what she is saying. Given the cultural climate at Stanford it seems to have been nearly impossible not to be a feminist. She was not free to choose whether or not to buy the party line.

Feminists told her that they had accomplished great things. They told her that they were fighting against sexual assault, on campus and in the workplace. They told her that they were fighting against the patriarchy. They might also have told her that increased awareness and a grand public conversation about sexual harassment would solve the problem of sexism in the workplace. They probably did not tell her that heightened awareness of sexual harassment is more likely to produce more sexual harassment. And they probably did not tell her that if young women enter the workplace with the idea that they are going to advance the feminist cause and overthrow the patriarchy, this attitude, or the presumption of same, will not advance their careers.

Reading the stories of workplace sexual assault Thulin feels unmoored. She did not expect this.She was not told how to deal with it. This wonderful new world that feminists have worked so hard to create now looked like a shark tank. Thulin started feeling like chum:

I had prepared to face sexism, but I didn’t expect sexual harassment to lurk in progressive offices in the light of day; I hadn’t envisioned myself as prey and was loath to contemplate current or future co-workers as would-be predators.

Feminism, Thulin began to realize, was selling a fairy tale:

I read and wrote and added tally marks representing women who’d been treated simply as female bodies, as the triumphant story of shattered glass ceilings I’d been told came to seem like an aspirational fairytale.

Forty years of fighting sexual harassment and things seem, if anything to have gotten worse. All that talk about strong, empowered women, all those beliefs about how if you keep saying that women are strong and empowered they will naturally become strong and empowered... has run afoul of a fact that everyone who is not a feminist has always known: men are stronger and more powerful.

She looks back at the situation in 1975:

Swap out names, and the words of this 1975 New York Times article could be published verbatim today:

“Sexual harassment of women in their place of employment is extremely widespread. It is literally epidemic,” said Lin Farley, director of the women’s section of the Human Affairs Program at Cornell University.

But though we can recognize sexual harassment as wholly unacceptable, we still haven’t purged it from the workplace. That’s progress toward parity at a glacial rate. It’s been pretty crushing to realize how little seems to have changed.

Feminism was lying, not because its aspirations were noble but because it did not prepare her to face reality. And that reality includes the fact that fifty years of feminism has perhaps made the situation worse:

Feminism told me I was an empowered professional woman, part of the vanguard that would finally get to storm boardrooms and director’s chairs. Now I am struggling to reconcile this image of myself with the idea that some man soon might see me not as an equal but as a sexual plaything conveniently housed in a nearby cubicle.

Now she finds herself thinking of how she can avoid harassment, without running afoul of the feminist party line:

Yet I’ve also read enough feminist cultural analysis to know that taking precautionary steps to prevent my own harassment feels like buying into the myth of victim-blaming, and the last thing I want to do is perpetuate the idea that sexual harassment happens because a woman wasn’t careful enough. And how can I be empowered if I’m acting out of fear? Besides, being perpetually on-guard also seems unfair, a blanket smear of all the well-intentioned men who do understand power and privilege and treat their female co-workers with respect. It’s hard not to feel stumped.

Or disillusioned.

Palestinian Terrorism Defeated?

Among the welcome side-effects of the reform movement in Saudi Arabia and of the Sunni Arab alliance to fight terrorism is this: Palestinian terrorists are now losing… both the battle and the war.

Will President Trump keep his promise and move the U. S. Embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem? Will he recognize Jerusalem as the capital of Israel? All presidential candidates swear that they will do it. Apparently, the Trump administration is poised to make a move?

The Wall Street Journal paints a picture of Palestinian defeat:

As the White House considers a proposal to relocate the U.S. Embassy from Tel Aviv and recognize Jerusalem as Israel’s capital, frustrated Palestinians concede they have few options to counter the controversial move….

With Palestinians themselves deeply divided, and Arab states offering little opposition to White House proposals, hopes for a path to Palestinian statehood in the near term appearextremely dim.

To some, even protests against the U.S. Embassy move seem futile now. “Who is going to protest with us?” Mahdi Hejazi, 71 years old, said outside Jerusalem’s Al Aqsa mosque after leaving Friday prayers. “We are like someone stuck at the bottom of a well. Even if we scream, no one hears us.”

As Israel makes giant strides toward victory over the Palestinian insurgency and as Prime Minister Netanyahu advances the nation diplomatically around the world, we note that the opposition party, led by Ehud Barak is gnashing its teeth… because Netanyahu has not made sufficient concessions to the Palestinians. The Israeli left, along with the American and Western European left, still believes that peace treaties are a panacea. Isn't it time they checked in to the Reality Motel?

Most importantly for the calculation, Egypt and Saudi Arabia have not voiced any open objection. They prefer to have good relations with President Trump. And I suspect that they also want to develop closer ties with Israel. After all, Israel can sell them high technology. What do the Palestinians have to offer the world… besides terrorism.

The Journal report continues:

At the same time, Palestinians acknowledge the U.S. hasn’t announced anything concrete about the plan, which still appears to be under discussion. Meanwhile, their long-time supporters in other parts of the Arab world—such as Saudi Arabia and Egypt—have been keen to cultivate closer ties to President Donald Trump’s administration. They have largely kept quiet after news the U.S. was considering the embassy move.

“We have no cards to play,” said Ahmed Azzam, a 35-year-old accountant after prayers. “Even violence isn’t going to lead anyone anywhere.”

Friday, December 1, 2017

Blog Appreciation Friday

Being as this is a conservative blog, I try to respect tradition. Even my own invented traditions. Like asking for donations during the week after Thanksgiving.

It might not seem like it, but it takes considerable work to produce these posts every day. For those who wish to support and even reward my efforts I recommend a donation. It’s thoroughly in keeping with the holiday spirit. As they say: It's more blessed to give than to receive.

If you click on the orange Donate button on the left side of this page, the kind folks at Paypal will help you to contribute as much as you would like.

If you do not wish to use Paypal, I gratefully accept checks or cash or even Bitcoin sent to my address:

                   310 East 46th St. 24H
                   New York, NY   10017

If you have a friend or a relative who is a psychoanalyst or who still clings to Freudian theory, you would be doing him a great favor by sending a copy of  my book, The Last Psychoanalyst. It’s the perfect holiday gift. See the link at left.

Thank you in advance.

Say Cheese!

One has long suspected that nutritional and dietary guidelines are less than reliable. Once upon a time everyone thought that eating high cholesterol foods was going to give you heart disease. Thus, well-meaning souls replaced eggs and burgers with grass and twigs.

Evidently, the human organism reacts badly to imperious efforts to force it to follow the dictates of behavioral economists and other so-called experts. We saw what happened in public schools when Michelle Obama decreed that children replace pizza and fries with lettuce and carrots. The children went hungry and started skipping school to gorge themselves on Whoppers.

Anyway, new research is undoing the damage done by prior nutritional gurus. Recently, a Chinese study discovered (or claimed) that eating cheese was not only not bad for you. It was good for you. They drew this conclusion from studying Frenchmen and Frenchwomen. How did it happen that they ate cheese and had lower incidence of heart disease? Was it all about the red wine or was it the whining?

The Daily Mail has the story:

Cheese has a reputation for being bad for you – but research suggests eating it every day could in fact reduce your chances of developing heart disease.

Consuming a matchbox size amount – one-and-a-half ounces or 40g – daily can slash the risk by 14 per cent.

This same portion size could lower the risk of a stroke by 10 per cent, found the Chinese study.

Researchers are keen to understand the so-called 'French paradox', a perplexing phenomenon in which French people, who tend to have diets rich in cholesterol and saturated fat, somehow have low rates of heart disease.

Soochow University has now found that cheese raises levels of so-called 'good' cholesterol while reducing levels of 'bad' cholesterol. 

Although cheese contains high levels of saturated fat – linked to bad heart health – the calcium in the food means less of that fat is absorbed by the body, it was discovered.

Additionally, it also contains an acid that can help prevent clogging of the arteries. 

Who knew?

They All Went to College

Of course, it’s a fraud. We would not want to hold African-American students to any standards whatever. They have problems. They suffer from bad families and they live in bad neighborhoods. We do not want to be too tough on them. It might hurt their feelings. And it might undermine their self-esteem.

So, we take a page from the politically correct playbook and just give them passing grades... and then allow them to graduate. And then we send them off to college, uneducated and unprepared. If colleges have the same standards as high schools they will graduate knowing nothing, being unprepared to get a serious job and will return to their neighborhoods, to perpetuate the same cycle of failure. But, they will have high self-esteem and will know how to blame white males for their problems.

Keep in mind, for these people, failure is just a social construction. All you need do is pronounce someone a success, and presto changeo, he is a success.

The story come from NPR, (via Maggie's Farm) thus from a source that is not filled with right wing Tea Party patriots.

The first problem with the District of Columbia’s Ballou High School is that students do not attend classes. This does not prevent them from being counted present—yet another social construction—and given diplomas. How much are these diplomas worth? I leave it to your imagination. And of course, they all then attend college.

NPR reports:

An investigation by WAMU and NPR has found that Ballou High School's administration graduated dozens of students despite high rates of unexcused absences. We reviewed hundreds of pages of Ballou's attendance records, class rosters and emails after a district employee shared the private documents. Half of the graduates missed more than three months of school last year, unexcused. One in five students was absent more than present — missing more than 90 days of school.

According to district policy, if a student misses a class 30 times, he should fail that course. Research shows that missing 10 percent of school, about two days per month, can negatively affect test scores, reduce academic growth and increase the chances a student will drop out.

Teachers say when many of these students did attend school, they struggled academically, often needing intense remediation.

Giving passing grades to students who do not attend class was school policy. To do otherwise would have been racist. And besides, we no longer care whether the students know anything. What really matters is that they have high self-esteem, that we have filled their minds with false pride:

WAMU and NPR talked to nearly a dozen current and recent Ballou teachers — as well as four recent graduates — who tell the same story: Teachers felt pressure from administration to pass chronically absent students, and students knew the school administration would do as much as possible to get them to graduation.

"It's oppressive to the kids because you're giving them a false sense of success," says one current Ballou teacher, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to protect her job.

"To not prepare them is not ethical," says another current Ballou teacher who also spoke on the condition of anonymity.

"They're not prepared to succeed," says Morgan Williams, who taught health and physical education at Ballou last year. Williams says the lack of expectations set up students for future failure: "If I knew I could skip the whole semester and still pass, why would I try?"

This is grossly unfair to black students. It’s an injustice:

One current teacher says, from the perspective of a black teacher teaching predominantly black students, graduating these students is an injustice. "This is [the] biggest way to keep a community down. To graduate students who aren't qualified, send them off to college unprepared, so they return to the community to continue the cycle."

We can evaluate the academic prowess of these children by looking at their SAT scores. Read them and weep:

Plus, many of the students who were in those classrooms were struggling academically. Last year, 9 percent of students there passed the English standardized test. No one passed the math test. The average SAT score last year among Ballou test takers was 782 out of 1600.

Fat Shaming and Family Dinners

The headline blares from the Daily Mail:

Over half American kids will be obese by 35: Report reveals more than 57% of children are dangerously unhealthy
  • Current eating and exercise trends are making children unhealthy
  • Even those who are currently normal weight face high obesity risk
  • The study by Harvard University warned the boom in adult obesity in a couple of decades will cost America billions more in healthcare costs

To be fair, if half of America’s children are still children when they are 35, obesity will be the least of their problems.

But, I digress.

At least, we have overcome fat-shaming. Didn’t the Tiger Mom declare that she felt no guilt whatever for telling her daughters to lose a bit weight, even if that meant calling them “fatty.” As Amy Chua put it, America’s parents refuse to fat-shame, but are bringing up children who have serious weight problems. Duh?

How did we get to this point?

Julie Gunlock suggests that it might—it just might—have something to do with Michelle Obama’s anti-obesity crusade. Could it be that the campaign to force children to eat what Michelle Obama wanted them to eat has failed? I know it's hard to believe.

Gunlock comments on the Daily Mail story:

That's interesting considering all the work Former First Lady Michelle Obama did to reduce the number of overweight children. She completely revamped the school lunch program (which resulted in inedible food being served to kids and a massive and very embarrassing food waste problem). She launched "Let's Move" in an effort to get kids moving. She beat up on food companies for producing what consumers demand and backed food activist demands to add more and costly labels to foods and restaurant menus. She pressured grocery stores to stop stocking certain food items and even criticized advertisers for putting food ads on television.

What went wrong?

Gunlock suggests that the Obama administration tried to solve the problem by giving the government power over people’s lives. It took eating out of the home and family, thus undermining family structure. So much for family dinner or family breakfast:

Instead, the Obama administration sideline parents and encourage them to pass off their child's nutritional development to the state—in this case the school lunch lady. In fact, under the Obama Administration, the school dinner program expanded from a small federal pilot program serving 13 urban areas to a national program serving all schools. So, now, kids can have three full meals served at school--breakfast lunch and dinner.

And what has that gotten us? More chubby kids.

Apparently, the Obama administration failed to notice that consuming victuals is a family ritual.  And that children control their appetite best when they regularly eat with other members of their family. It is not just a question of calories and globules of far. For undermining the family and especially the security a child feels when he has a consistent and structured mealtime the Obama administration failed America’s children and pushed them toward adult obesity:

There's a high cost to parents ceding their child's nutrition--and kids are paying that price. Childhood obesity studies overwhelmingly show that family meals, limiting television viewing, and getting kids to bed at a reasonable hour are the real keys to helping kids eat right and maintain a healthy weight. A home-packed meal is a part of that.

So maybe, given these latest grim childhood obesity numbers we can hold off on yet again expanding these useless government feeding programs and do something new and cutting edge--encourage parents to take responsibility for feeding their own children.