Andrew Sullivan to the rescue.
Recently, at the University of Chicago, columnist and gay
activist Dan Savage was called out for using the word “tranny.”
If the thought police can take out after a Dan Savage,
anyone can be next.
Responding to the confrontation/conflagration, Sullivan
posted a vigorous, traditionally liberal defense of free speech. He
accompanied it with advice to gays and trannies: being thin-skinned makes you look
weak. It reminds us of the old principle
our parents used to tell us: Sticks and stones….
In Sullivan’s words:
Policing
language is something no gay person should ever countenance – if only because
our language and our speech, as tiny minorities, could be the first to be
policed in that brave new world. And what does it say about someone’s
self-esteem that they run crying out of a seminar because they cannot handle a
simple fricking word (and that they do that, while preferring to be referred to
as “it”!). I know life as a member of a sexual minority is not exactly an easy
one. But what happened to self-empowerment? Whatever happened to the proud,
fearless trans people fighting back against the cops at Stonewall? Whatever
happened to the great tradition of flouting all sorts of public norms and
parading down main street in full Pride regalia? Or the tradition of bawdy
outrage perfected by generations of drag queens, gay satirists, cultural
provocateurs, and performance artists whose goals often include the salutary
impact of – precisely – offense?
We have now moved beyond he/she pronominal forms, beyond the
newly invented generic “she,” even beyond the singular “they.” Transgendered
individuals want to be called “it.” Even Sullivan cannot resist ridiculing the
notion.
However strong people feel for making a scene and shutting
down someone’s speech, all the whining about language is pathetic. Sullivan is
not the first to denounce it, but in certain circles his words have a great deal
of weight:
All of
this is to be buried in a ghastly, quivering, defensive crouch of affirming
claptrap, with trans people whining to teacher that someone said a naughty
word, and incapable of taking in even a completely benign discussion without
collapsing into trauma and tears. There is only one word for this and it is pathetic. I’m all in favor of
avoiding words that some people find distressing if at all possible. It can get
in the way of an argument, or simple manners. But I am more in favor of free,
bold and fearless speech and argument, in which every t and l and g and b can
give as good as they get, and in which this sad and pathetic recourse to
fathomless victimology is called out for the disgrace it is. It is entirely
self-defeating. No one else can give you the self-respect you may want. No one
else’s words have any more power over you than you decide to give to them.
3 comments:
"We have now moved beyond he/she pronominal forms, beyond the newly invented generic “she,”..."
Isn't that supposed to be "s/he"?
"Transgendered individuals want to be called “it.” " Yes, being a neuter is being a thing, an object, no different from being inanimate. Not a good place to go...
Riffing on Sullivan, they are not strong enough mentally to go out in public without their mommy or daddy.
"No one else can give you the self-respect you may want."
Pure smoke. These people are not after self-respect. They are after special rights, status as a protected political class of victim, privileges, entitlements, access, power, and -- if possible -- a government sinecure and gold-plated pension.
Someone mentioned trans-fats to me the other day, and I corrected "LGBTQ-fats; gotta be inclusive".
Post a Comment