At first, you think it’s a parody. Lizzie Crocker has
greeted Miley Cyrus’s latest foray into exhibitionism by declaring that Cyrus
is setting an excellent example for girls everywhere.
In Crocker’s words:
And so,
posing nude in the bathtub, bubbles barely blurring her vagina, Miley Cyrus is
again having fun on her own terms. All the anguished blah directed at her says
more about our panic over youthful female sexuality than it says about her.
Cyrus has shown she’s all grown up. It’s time we grew up too.
Crocker would do well to find out what it means to be all
grown up.
I have not done a scientific survey about the matter, but I
have reason to believe that most mothers of teenage girls are horrified and
aghast that their daughters might take Miley Cyrus as a role model.
At a time when far too many girls are sexting images of
their private parts to teenage boys—thus risking exposure to large numbers of
schoolmates and being unequipped to deal with the attendant shame—Lizzie
Crocker is telling mothers to chill. And she is telling young girls that they
should follow the example set by Miley Cyrus and flaunt their sex in public.
It should not need saying, but Crocker is appallingly wrong
about this. She might believe that she is fighting the good fight for female
sexuality, but, in truth she is telling girls to overcome their sense of
modesty and shame.
Miley Cyrus might think that she has grown up. Lizzie
Crocker seems to agree. In truth, Cyrus is a celebrity. She is acting more
like a porn star than like a woman who is comfortable with her sexuality.
If Crocker believes that such photos are empowering and if
she believes that nude photos set a good example, she should put her #%@#&
where her mouth is. If she is unwilling to do a Miley Cyrus herself she has no
business recommending that anyone else do it either.
Just about every adult woman knows that a woman who is
comfortable with her sexuality does not expose it to the general public. A woman
who is comfortable with her sexuality holds it in reserve for intimate moments
within a constituted relationship.
One would expect that an adult like Crocker understands the difference between exposing your sexuality and enjoying it. Does she really
believe that porn stars, the gold standard in shamelessness, are enjoying their
sexuality?
Does she not know that they pay a very high price, in
terms of their relationships and their social standing, for their jobs.
Any individual, of either gender, who exposes his or her
private parts to the public will lose a considerable quantity of respect, both
professionally and personally.
This strange brouhaha raises a salient question. If, as I
will assume, human beings, especially female human beings are not naturally
prone to expose their private parts in public, how has it happened that so many
have chosen to act like incipient porn stars?
One can blame it on the iPhone or on Facebook, but that
seems like an easy out. The fact that someone can do something does not
necessarily mean that he or she will or should.
And it is that much more puzzling when the mothers of the
girls who are sexting are almost certainly telling them not to do it and
warning them of the dangers that befall those who expose too much of themselves
to too many people.
Ought we to denounce these mothers because they are wizened
prudes, jealous and terrified of their daughters’ burgeoning sexuality?
For some time now our culture has been trying to undermine
parental authority. Parents are routinely mocked for being old-fashioned, denounced
for being oppressive and accused of being abusive.
The upshot is that children have been taught not
to trust their parents.
And yet, if a young girl were to ask herself: who cares more
about you: your mother or Miley Cyrus, how would she answer? If she were to ask
herself: who cares more about you, your mother or Lizzie Crocker, how should
she answer?
If the culture has persuaded her that Miley Cyrus and Lizzie
Crocker have a better notion of what is best for her, better than her parents,
this suggests that the work of brainwashing has largely succeeded.
Once you convince children not to trust their parents and
not to follow the rules and moral precepts that their parents are trying to
teach them, they will naturally look elsewhere for guidance.
They might look to their teachers. They might look to
guidance counselors. They might even look to celebrities. Later, they might
look to people that the culture holds up as thought leaders.
If girls in increasingly large numbers are indulging the bad
habit of sexting, they are doing what they have been told is the right thing to
do. They may or may not be following the example of Miley Cyrus. If not, they
are probably following instructions that were given them by other people, like
Lizzie Crocker and her ilk.
8 comments:
"She might believe that she is fighting the good fight for female sexuality, but, in truth she is telling girls to overcome their sense of modesty and shame."
I'm pretty sure that overcoming their sense of modesty and shame is the goal here.
She's so out of control.. she's no role model cmon...
The Stylish Confessions | Fashion & Beauty blog
Remember "Never trust anyone older than 30? Them as said it are way over 30 now. Lizzie may be under 30, but I can see she has drunk the Kool-Aid and can't be trusted.
I think I found the picture in question, and I have to say that the foam is covering her pubes and (probably) her labia, I doubt that her vagina would be visible in any case in that pose.""And....my G*D she is ugly! And getting worse--does she "do" meth or something?
Miley is a rally good example of how to be a bad example.
Lizzie
http://valentinenyc.com/site/media/glHk1Q-FFxDUOfRXM9aCauib-AyIV7yRhAMFI02pMj0_zpsf6a4ad82.jpg
Surprised?
A woman's private part should be like a house, not a hotel(let alone a hostel).
It should give the key to only that special man. If turned into public property, it's not special anymore.
What a worthless article by an even worthless person and I ain't talking bout crocker
Post a Comment