The news from the education front is not good. We should not
jump to stark conclusions from one year’s test results, but American
schoolchildren in the fourth and eighth grades are not doing well. Their proficiency
in reading and math has, on a year-over-year basis, declined.
At a time when mathematics is becoming increasingly
important for future careers, American children are falling further behind. The
question is not whether they can compete with the children in Singapore
or Helsinki. They are doing worse than their own cohorts did two years ago… and worse than every other time since the tests were first given in 1990.
Surely, this is why President Obama offered up his own
solution to the problem: don’t test the children so much. After all, if they
don’t take tests they cannot fail at the tests. It's like saying that we can reduce the crime rate by not arresting so many people.
One must also note that many
parents have opted out of the tests… because they do not agree with what
Washington is trying to impose on them under the name of Common Core.
Brilliant… this is what seven years of Obama education policy
has gotten us.
The New York Times reports:
For the
first time since 1990, the mathematical skills of American students have
dropped, according to results of a nationwide test released by the Education
Department on Wednesday.
The
decline appeared in both Grades 4 and 8 in an exam administered every two years
as the National Assessment of
Educational Progressand sometimes called “the nation’s report card.”
The dip
in scores comes as the country’s employers demand workers with ever-stronger
skills in mathematics to compete in a global economy. It also comes as states
grapple with the new Common Core academic standards and a rebellion against
them.
As for language skills, the
results are also discouraging:
Progress
in reading, which has been generally more muted than in math for decades, also
stalled this year as scores among fourth graders flat-lined and eighth-grade
scores decreased. The exams assess a representative sampling of students on
math and reading skills in public and private schools.
But, what does it all mean? Several interpretations offer
themselves:
Education
officials said that the first-time decline in math scores was unexpected, but
that it could be related to changes ushered in by the Common Core standards,
which have been adopted by more than 40 states. For example, some of the
fourth-grade math questions on data analysis, statistics and geometry are not
part of that grade’s guidelines under the Common Core and so might not have
been covered in class. The largest score drops on the fourth-grade math exams
were on questions related to those topics.
The
stagnating performance could also reflect the demographic changes sweeping
America’s schools and the persistent achievement gap between white students and
minorities, as well as between students from poor families and their more
affluent peers.
One hypothesis is that it is the fault of Common Core. The
Times considers this possibility:
As
states have adopted the Common Core — guidelines for what students should know
and be able to do between kindergarten and high school — many teachers have
adjusted their curriculum and instructional methods, particularly in math.
Students are asked to use math to solve real-life problems and find different
ways to come at the same answer rather than simply repeating formulas.
Some
educators suggested that some of the changes have sowed confusion among
teachers and students that could be reflected in the national test scores.
“Right now, what’s going on in many states is a wholesale change in math
instruction,” said Daniel Koretz, a professor of education at Harvard. “We
don’t know what’s happening with that in classrooms.”
One has had occasion to comment on this before, but the
point should be made again: children learn math better by memorizing and
applying formulas by rote. By forcing them to think about all the different
ways they can find the same answer and by casting the multiplication tables in
terms of solving real life problems, teachers are slowing down the learning
process.
The Times also notes that some of the topics on the eighth
grade math test were not covered in the new Common Core curriculum. This
suggests, if I read it correctly, that Common Core is less challenging that
previous teaching methods.
And then there are demographics. America’s schools have very
recently seen an influx of poor, uneducated children from Mexico and Central
America. Surely, these children are dragging down the scores, but their
presence might also be slowing down the pace of classroom instruction.
The Times does offer the following on demographics:
About a
quarter of public school students are Hispanic, compared with fewer than 10
percent in 1990. As a group, the scores of Hispanic students trail those of
white students; this year, for example, 21 percent of Hispanic fourth graders
scored at a level deemed proficient or above on reading tests, compared with 46
percent of white students.
The
proportion of African-American students in public schools has remained fairly
stable, but an achievement gap with white students remains. On the fourth-grade
reading tests this year, just 18 percent of black students were deemed
proficient.
America’s
schoolchildren are also increasingly poor. Students from poor families often arrive
at school with smaller vocabularies than students from middle-class or more
affluent households, and are faced with challenges like hunger, homelessness
and parents working several jobs, all of which can interfere with their
learning in school and the academic support they receive at home — and
ultimately their test scores.
Of course, the problem is not the difference between the percentage
of Hispanic children in 1990 vs. the percentage today. The scores increased every year from 1990 until 2013. Thus, we should be looking for a
more proximate cause.
In fact, the scores are compared to those from 2013. The
Times has the statistics:
The
average fourth-grade math score this year was 240 on a scale of 500, down from
242 in 2013, the last time the federal assessment results were released. The
average eighth-grade math score was 282, down from 285 two years ago.
In
reading, the average fourth-grade score of 223, compared with 222 in 2013, was
not a statistically significant difference. The average eighth-grade score fell
to 265 from 268.
Also, it is frightening to see that when it comes to reading
proficiency among fourth graders, white children score 46%, Hispanic children
score 21% and black children score 18%. The scores are appalling.
One is confident that poverty plays an important role in
some cases, and one suspects that there is more poverty among black and
Hispanic students than there is among white students. And, what happened to the
Asian students? You know, the ones who are being brought up by the dread Tiger
Moms. What are their proficiency rates?
If the poverty rate in minority communities has recently
increased and if the schools have been forced to use Common Core teaching methods, one
is obliged to say that much of the fault must lie with the presidency of Barack
Obama.
To keep it all in balance, we also must note that many of
these schools have adopted Michelle Obama’s signature healthy foods program.
Since many children are refusing to eat these so-called healthy meals, one
might also conclude that they are doing badly on their tests because they are
malnourished.
5 comments:
NYT: Education officials said that the first-time decline in math scores was unexpected, but that it could be related to changes ushered in by the Common Core standards, which have been adopted by more than 40 states. For example, some of the fourth-grade math questions on data analysis, statistics and geometry are not part of that grade’s guidelines under the Common Core and so might not have been covered in class. The largest score drops on the fourth-grade math exams were on questions related to those topics.
If Common Core is the problem, then its good not all states have went with it. Minnesota for instance skipped the Math standards. Has the Minnesota Math scores also gone down?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_Core_State_Standards_Initiative#Adoption_and_implementation_of_Common_Core_State_Standards_by_states
NYT: A study released Monday showed that some items included in the national assessments are not covered by the Common Core before the grades in which they are tested. “Knowing other kinds of math isn’t going to help you unless you’ve been taught it,” said Fran Stancavage, an author of the study. “The Common Core moves the sequence around, so there are lots of things that used to be taught before fourth grade that are now showing up in higher grades.”
OOPSEE!
It all does sound a mess. And what's most important? Do we want schools to maximize the number of students who can pass the lowest levels of proficiency, or do we want to put more effort for the most motivated and gifted students who are bored by low standards push the limits on top, like the international Mathematical Olympiads.
Apparently our home team won the international competition.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2015/07/17/winning-formula-usa-tops-international-math-olympiad-for-first-time-in-21-years/
I can almost vote against the bottom feeder standards, at least if it means wasting more and more time testing students, and then having teachers "teach the test" until the diminishing returns of that break down.
I'd also be interested in seeing how technology helps or hinders learning. Some districts have more access to technology than others, and that pushes students into more and more one-on-computer learning, which is perhaps better for upper grades, but might help create students who are less able to listen as well as taking initiative without getting prodded on every step.
So much responsibility, and everyone knows the right way to do things, and the teachers are left trying to satisfy everyone, and risk failing all?
When self esteem is viewed as the greatest good a child can have, standards go in the tank because failure to meet them is viewed as mean. That's why we're where we are. Sad, but true. Many parents cannot comprehend that emotions are fleeting. Every hiccup is viewed as the "great event" that will burn in their psyches forever.
p.s. Maybe here's one good reason why Minnesota didn't adopt the math standard. Apparently a commutativity property is too advanced for Common Core third graders.
I can see how such testing will generate rational resentment, long before irrational numbers are explored.
http://www.independent.co.uk/student/news/parents-criticise-us-common-core-maths-after-third-grade-pupil-told-solution-for-55515-is-incorrect-a6711736.html
-----------
5x3 may not look like much of a puzzle but this particular maths question may just be the most challenging one you come across today, if parents’ online reactions are anything to go by.
According to one post doing the rounds on image sharing site, Imgur, a US third-grade school pupil correctly answered the question ‘15’ - as expected - only for the teacher to mark it incorrect as part of the country’s controversial Common Core standards.
Having highlighted the solution behind the question as 5+5+5, the correct answer, in fact, should have shown five groups of three instead.
-----------
I think there is more to the issue than uneaten lunches.
My kindergartner grandson eats breakfast at home, a snack at school, and then goes to lunch. The noisy lunchroom distracts him from eating. He will sometimes eat his fruit and drink milk. The rest of his home-prepared lunch goes back home for an after school snack, at which time he is "starving", as he puts it. (He quickly refused to eat anything offered by the free school lunch program.)
In spite of that, he is doing quite well in his class and loves kindergarten. He is quickly learning to read. He comes from a stable upper middle class home with a married mother and father, both of whom are college educated. The home environment is critical. Sure, some students can overcome it, but they have big obstacles from the beginning.
Also, I think the common core math standards are putting the cart before the horse. This won't turn out well.
There's more to worry about when it comes to children:
http://www.breitbart.com/big-hollywood/2015/10/28/listen-to-jared-fogles-creepy-confessions-about-child-sex/
This man is in prison for having sex with children.
Having sex with children is still illegal in the US.
But consider how the entertainment industry is encouraging children to dress like hookers and hustlers. Rap music sexualizes young children with raunchy lyrics and beats. Pornography is now available to children all over the net. Walt Disney promotes slutty fashion for kids.
US education teaches kindergarteners and elementary school children that homosexual fecal penetration is wonderful.
When children are being so sexualized, it means children are sexual creatures too. And if we go that route, it means children should have the right to have sex. When that happens, will pedophilia become legal? Everything that is happening in our culture in entertainment and schools is headed in this direction.
And there was a piece in Salon that tried to normalize the feelings of a pedophile.
And there's always been a close link between the homosexual community and the pedophile community. Many prominent homos have also been pedos. Like Allen Ginsburg.
Post a Comment