Note well the title of Thomas Friedman’s latest column: “Telling
Middle East Negotiators: ‘Have a nice life.’”
In his opening paragraph Friedman describes a scene that
took place on the eve of the 1991 Madrid peace conference that Pres. George H.
W. Bush convened after winning the first Gulf
War.
In Friedman’s words:
In the Times
review of the American Mideast negotiator Dennis Ross’s important new
history of Israeli-U.S. relations, “Doomed to Succeed,” a telling moment on the
eve of the 1991 Madrid peace conference caught my attention. The Palestinian
delegation had raised some last-minute reservations with the secretary of
state, James A. Baker III. Baker was livid, and told the Palestinians before
walking out on them: “With you people, the souk never closes, but it is closed
with me. Have a nice life.”
Did you note the way the
Times introduced its own special anti-Israeli bias in the headline? Though
the headline says that James Baker was walking out on “Middle East negotiators,”
in truth he was excoriating the Palestinian delegation for failing to act in
good faith. He was dismissing them because, in his view, they were trying to
walk back from an agreement they had negotiated.
These are not the kinds of
people you can do business with. If they do not know how to be good to their
word, there is no real point in negotiating with them. It's the first lesson you learn in your negotiation course.
By making it appear that
Baker had dismissed both Palestinians and Israelis, Friedman or the Times
headline writer was suggesting--in fact, Friedman argues it in the rest of his
column-- that both sides are equally culpable, that today they must both make
concessions in order to forge a durable peace agreement. And yet, if only one
side is capable of keeping its word, what is the point of the concessions…
except to advance the final Palestinian goal—the destruction of Israel.
And, think about this
angle. When our current Secretary of State John Kerry negotiated his recent sell out
to the Iranians, giving them everything they wanted and more, can you imagine him
telling the Iranians to have a nice life.
It seems clear that Kerry
was charged with getting a deal at any price. Surely, he was the right man for
that job. the Iranians knew it and they played him skillfully.
2 comments:
It sounds a little like John Boehner's job as Speaker of the House.
Now with no regrets he can say "Have a nice life" or sing "Zip-a-Dee-Doo-Dah" and see what Paul Ryan can do.
Meanwhile the Freedom Caucus is in hot water with the Churchillian "we shall never surrender" coalition of the far right to sabotoge every compromise that makes a functional government possible.
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/10/28/freedom-caucus-continues-surrender-backs-paul-ryan-amid-support-of-big-government-debt-budget-deal/
Any bets on how long Ryan lasts? I admit I'm a novice on prediction here. I keep thinking the republicans are about to splinter, and hoping. Maybe the reelection of Hillary in 2020 is what it'll take?
What? The NYT carefully skews their headlines and stories both? Quelle suprise!
Post a Comment