For obvious reasons I am always on the lookout for evidence
about the relative effectiveness of psychotherapy. All forms of therapy—even psychoanalysis—claim
to offer treatment that works, but I remain somewhat skeptical about the
results. Especially because many forms of therapy are practiced differently by
different practitioners. With the exception of cognitive and behavioral
therapies most therapies are not practiced with anything that resembles
uniformity.
And besides, how many patient problems resolve themselves
for reasons that have nothing to do with psycho insights, by a change in
lifestyle, for example? And how many resolve themselves because patients
believe that therapy will work—call it the placebo effect.
Now, we have a new study that demonstrates that
psychotherapy can help patients who suffer from irritable bowel syndrome. You
know it by its acronym: IBS.
Researchers at Vanderbilt University report their findings:
Worldwide,
roughly one adult in 10 suffers from a painful and sometimes debilitating
condition called irritable bowel syndrome, or IBS.
Previous
studies have found that, on average, psychotherapy is just as effective as
medications in reducing the severity of symptoms of this gastrointestinal
disorder and the type of psychotherapy did not seem to matter.
Time for a revision. Further studies discovered that the
type of therapy really did matter. Patients who were offered
cognitive behavior treatments did better than those who received other forms
of therapy:
Now,
psychologists at Vanderbilt University have looked at different types of
psychotherapy to determine which is best at improving the ability of IBS
patients to participate in daily activities. They found that one form, called
cognitive behavior therapy, was the most effective.
“Evaluating
daily function is important because it distinguishes between someone who
experiences physical symptoms but can fully engage in work, school and social
activities and someone who cannot,” said Kelsey Laird, a doctoral student in
Vanderbilt’s clinical psychology program.
Indeed, the researchers were correct to evaluate the effectiveness as a function of the patients' ability to function effectively in their everyday life.
Why is this so?
The
authors speculate that the greater improvement observed in patients who
received CBT may be due to the fact that treatments often incorporate
“exposure:” a technique in which individuals gradually expose themselves to
uncomfortable situations. For someone with IBS, this could include long road
trips, eating out at restaurants and going places where bathrooms are not
readily accessible.
“Encouraging
individuals to gradually confront such situations may increase their ability to
participate in a wider range of activities,” said Laird. “But more research is
needed before we can say why CBT appears more effective for improving
functioning in IBS compared to other therapy types.”
It’s not about performing mental exercises as much as
exposing oneself to situations that one would normally avoid. That is, by changing everyday behavior. If anxiety causes you to behave one way, CBT does not ask why you feel anxious. It teaches you a behavior that would have been performed by someone who did have the problem or the attendant anxiety. By gradually
exposing oneself to such situations the patient with IBS learns to function in
them. In that way he or she overcomes the anxiety that prevents normal
functioning.
4 comments:
> irritable bowel syndrome. You know it by its acronym: IBD.
Are you making a distinction between IBS and IBD? If so, what is that distinction? If not, why invent a new TLA (Three Letter Acronym)?
And I thought IBD was Investor's Business Daily. Hmph.
It's called making a mistake... since corrected.
Actually, it's not a mistake if this is the same thing...
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inflammatory_bowel_disease
Post a Comment