Molly Hodgdon lives in Vermont. You know about Vermont. It
gave us Bernie Sanders. But it also gave us a large coterie of tree-hugging
environmentalists who worship at the altar of Mother Nature. (Via Maggie’sFarm)
Naturist cult followers believe that what is natural is good
and that what is artificial, unnatural, technological or industrial is bad.
It’s a simple-minded moral schema, but what did you expect from people who
spend their days contemplating Nature’s raw beauty, without corrupting the view with polarized sun glasses.
Hodgdon lives in Vermont, so she sees Nature more clearly
than do those of us who live in the great cosmopolitan metropolis:
To live
in Vermont is to be smothered by nature’s beauty on a daily basis. Everywhere
you look is another peaceful pond, another shimmering lake or emerald hill or
misty field graced by a family of grazing deer. It’s almost obnoxious, like
that one friend you have who’s so pretty, funny, smart and talented that you
want to hate her stupid gorgeous face.
And yet, Nature’s natural goodness has given Hodgdon a case
of systemic lupus, an auto-immune disorder that does not enhance your
lifestyle:
That’s
why I just don’t buy the idea that ‘natural is best’. Your organic,
gluten-free, sprouted ancient-grain bread is all-natural? That’s nice. My
disease is all-natural too. My chronic pain, pleurisy and angry kidneys are
all-natural, and my death would’ve been too, if I didn’t have access to the
decidedly unnatural medications that allow me to lead a somewhat normal,
comfortable life.
In your reverie you should also think about the average life expectancy was
before all of that industrial sanitation arrived on the scene.
Cult followers do not want to hear about these inconvenient
truths, so Hodgdon lays it out:
But was
nature as great as their idealised Earth Mother fantasies suggest? We tend to
romanticise the past and blame every ailment on this crazy, modern lifestyle
and scary ‘new’ technologies, forgetting the mortality and brutality we’ve left
behind. If Eve was a real person living in the palaeolithic era, her life
expectancy would have been only about 30 years, max. As she approached this
ripe old age, she would likely have been prone to many of the same ailments that
people today don’t typically start to suffer from until their 60s. She would
have been fortunate to live that long, considering they obviously didn’t
benefit from miraculous modern medical advances such as antibiotics, cancer
treatments, obstetrics, surgery and Bioré pore strips. And yes, the abundance
of nutritious food that we enjoy today is thanks, in part, to GM technologies.
You know what makes my lupus feel better? When I can afford healthy food, all
year round.
And also:
Nature
can seem as inspiring, beautiful, strong and nurturing as a mother, but it
would be foolish to believe that this ‘mother’ loves us. There’s no reason we
can’t celebrate her glorious natural gifts while also appreciating the
important ‘unnatural’ improvements our fellow humans have created. I wouldn’t –
and couldn’t – have it any other way. Would you?
3 comments:
Perhaps as I have said many time before (I am older) the great post neo-modern philosopher Yogi Berra said "The good ole days aren't what they used to be." and somewhere near a shimmering pond Mother Nature laughs.
"Nature is red in tooth and claw." Also mandibles, fangs, and innumerable biting insects.
My in-laws live in upstate NY near the VT line. This vid perfectly captures the VT mindset...
https://youtu.be/XUv7NQelex0
I did bring some obscenely overpriced cheese home after my April visit. Meh.
Post a Comment