For all the stories about Otto Warmbier we have heard nothing about the fact that he was Jewish. It’s not just the media. Important Jewish
organizations have remained silent about the fate of a young American who was
abandoned by the Obama administration. After all, they cannot be expected to say anything that would make Obama look like he was disfavoring Jews.
Liel Leibovitz reports in Tablet:
Now
that Otto Warmbier is dead, it’s time to ask what, if anything, might’ve been
done to save the innocent young American from being detained and tortured by
North Korea’s genocidal regime. To answer that question, it’s instructive to
compare Warmbier’s case to those of two other Americans similarly seized and
imprisoned by our enemies—Steven Sotloff and Jason Rezaian.
The
Obama Administration, Warmbier’s father Fred said in a recent interview, urged a policy of inaction. “When Otto
was first taken,” he recalled, “we were advised by the past administration to
take a low profile while they worked to obtain his release. We did so without
result.”
The
Sotloffs, whose son, Steven, was a journalist kidnapped by ISIS in Syria, were
given similar instructions. When they tried to raise the ransom money necessary
for their son’s release, the Obama Administration, they said, warned them that negotiating with terrorists was out
of the question. Steven was eventually executed in a gruesome beheading
documented on camera and shared widely online.
As it happened, the Obama administration wanted to see
the plight of Jason Rezaian played up in the media. Leibovitz suggests that since
Rezaian had been kidnapped by the Iranians and since Obama wanted to make a
deal with the Iranians he was happy to gin up support for whatever he had to do
to trade Rezaian for planeloads of cash.
Leibovitz concludes:
To the
victims of Obama’s legacy—which include the hundreds of thousands slaughtered
in Syria as the United States did nothing so as not to jeopardize the Iran
Deal—add two more American families, the Sotloffs and the Warmbiers, whose
personal tragedies are compounded by the silence forced on them by the previous
administration.
In another, follow-up article Leibovitz calls out the
American Jewish organization for their silence about Warmbier.
You’d
think that the cluster of handsomely funded Jewish organizations that fly the
banner of promoting and protecting Jewish life in America and abroad would
notice and acknowledge Warmbier’s murder. So far, though, American Jewish officialdom
has been deafeningly silent.
Why is this so? These organizations have been spending all
their time bashing Donald Trump and defending notorious anti-Semites like Linda
Sarsour. They pledged allegiance to Barack Obama and are leading the Resistance to Donald Trump:
The
odious Anne Frank Center, whose disingenuous mission statement blathers on
about a kinder and fairer world where Jewish children are safe from the death
camps of tyrannical regimes, didn’t bother taking a break from bashing Donald
Trump to lament a young Jew put to death by the world’s worst offender of human
rights. Nor did the ADL, an organization quick to stand up with Linda Sarsour
as she denied Jews their right to self-determination but not so swift when the
victim was a young Jewish man whose crime was pulling a silly prank at his
hotel while on a college tour of a nation that routinely starves, imprisons,
and executes hundreds of thousands of its own citizens. Everywhere you turn
today, you hear no one demanding justice for Otto Warmbier.
In case you forgot about Linda Sarsour, James Kirchick recounts
her monstrous views:
Linda
Sarsour is a progressive-media darling. One of Essence magazine’s “Woke 100 Women,” Sarsour was named a
leader of the Women’s March that followed President Donald Trump’s inauguration,
despite declaring that “nothing is creepier than Zionism”—though her wish to
“take away” the “vagina” of clitoridectomy victim and human-rights activist
Ayaan Hirsi Ali, praise for Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan, upholding Saudi Arabia as a bastion of women’s
lib, embrace of the terrorist murderer Rasmea Odeh, and
claim that “Shariah law is reasonable” because “suddenly all your loans & credits cards become
interest-free,” are all—at least in my humble estimation—definitely
creepier.
What do the social justice warriors have to say about Warmbier? They have been yelping
about how Warmbier is a privileged white male, and thus that he deserved what
he got:
What
you do hear are the howls of the social justice brigades, for whom Warmbier,
being white and a man, is mostly to blame for his own murder. When the young
college student was arrested last year, the regressive left’s flagships, from Salon to the blessedly defunct Nightly
Show, gleefully mocked Warmbier, arguing that white privilege was the real
reason for his predicament and suggesting that when it came to oppression,
there was really no difference between Portland and Pyongyang. “The
hopeless fear Warmbier is now experiencing,” opined a young blogger on the Huffington Post, “is my
daily reality living in a country where white men like him are willfully
oblivious to my suffering even as they are complicit in maintaining the power
structures which ensure their supremacy at my expense.”
5 comments:
Stuart: What do the social justice warriors have to say about Warmbier? They have been yelping about how Warmbier is a privileged white male, and thus that he deserved what he got.
A Darwin award isn't an inaccurate narrative. Hyperfocusing on one prisoner, and one death seems myopic.
I could hope this tragic death can be used as leverage to get more prisoners released. And it sounds like the North Koreans themselves are the biggest victims of poor treatment.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/jun/20/otto-warmbiers-death-highlights-plight-of-foreigners-jailed-in-north-korea
----
“Foreign prisoners are held solely as bargaining chips for the North Korean regime, so there would be no advantage in mistreating them to the extent that they become dangerously ill or die of diseases caused by malnutrition,” said Jiro Ishimaru, of Asia Press, an Osaka-based organisation with a network of contacts in North Korea.
----
Some say "Never negotiate with terrorists", even ones that hold their own people hostage if you don't give them what they need, like well, food.
http://nationalinterest.org/feature/heres-tip-dont-give-north-korea-more-aid-13531
Otto was a Jew, and treated like one by the Obama administration and the Democrats.
Ares, that's why I have no faith, belief, or trust in SJWs. They only care about themselves.
Sam L. said... Otto was a Jew, and treated like one by the Obama administration and the Democrats.
What does "Treated like one" mean?! How am I supposed to parse meaning on that?!
If you believe someone is treated badly, and you say "treated like one", it sounds like you're saying it is expected a Jew will be treated badly, although I presume you find that expectation wrong. So you're expressing a cynicism and resentment against a prejudice society.
YET, it seems irrational to me to presume his religious heritage has anything to do with what happened at any level.
I suppose the same irrational argument could be used for explaining the DNC sabotaging Bernie Sanders for president last year, but in some things, some politicians seem better able to handle rationality.
It is interesting that a "Jew" qualifies as "white" to participate in the imaginary "white privilege" club. Apparently not that long ago Jews wouldn't qualify.
So SJW criticize his status of "whiteness", while some Jews are concerned about being victimizes as a Jew. Both whiteness and Jewishness would seem to be identities of privileged, but also potential resentment.
Humans are definitely too irrational for me, but I try to take these things as seriously as I can. Maybe that is my great mistake.
AO puts his antisemitism aside for a day.
Post a Comment