Dr. Max Pemberton, resident psychiatrist at The Daily Mail,
raises an interesting question. He does not seem to have the answer, but then
again, neither do I.
The question is: if we can now treat depression effectively
with anti-depressant medication why does Great Britain, which is awash in the
stuff, have such a high rate of depression?
Dr. Max explains:
What is
wrong with this country? I mean that quite seriously. Something clearly is not
right because, according to new statistics, people in the UK are among the most
depressed in the Western world.
The
data from the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
showed that our rates of depression are more than double those of countries
such as Poland, Greece, Italy and the Slovak Republic. And that is despite this
country having a relatively high standard of living.
Certainly, Great Britain has a higher standard of living
than do these other countries. Greece, after all, is the basket case of Europe.
Still, British people, awash in free anti-depressants, count
among the most depressed people in Europe:
Consider
this: we have some of the highest rates of antidepressant prescribing in the
world — and this is rising. The NHS issued 64.7 million prescriptions for
antidepressants last year, double the amount from a decade ago. Yet research also
shows people are getting more depressed, not less. So what is going on?
The
problem, I think, is that the way we understand depression has been dominated
in recent years by the idea that it’s just a chemical mishap in the brain; a
random imbalance of chemicals.
This
has been fuelled by the pharmaceutical industry, which with the development of
SSRIs (a group of antidepressants, including Prozac, which are now the most
commonly prescribed) has propagated the idea that depression can be treated
with pills.
As it happens, America is leading the world in anti-depressant
use, followed by Iceland, Australia, Canada and Sweden. Apparently, white
privilege is not all it’s knocked up to be. Being guilty about being white and being successful... those qualities, sold relentlessly by our culture ... might well contributing to the problem.
One should also note that American physicians often
prescribe opioids for psychiatric conditions like depression and anxiety.
Are Americans, like the British, getting more depressed? Are
all those anti-depressants improving the national mood? I suspect that they are
not. If psychiatric patients graduate to opioids, the SSRIs are probably not
helping. Besides, improved mood comes from belonging to social groups, acting as
an ethical individual and having a purpose in life. None of these can be
provided by a pill.
Why are there so many prescriptions for antidepressants? For
one, it is easier for a physician to prescribe Prozac than to take the time and make the effort to engage with the patient. It is far more cost effective to
write a prescription than to conduct cognitive therapy. Somehow or other the
famed British National Health Service seems to privilege writing prescriptions…
perhaps because they are short on practitioners.
In America the insurance industry bears a considerable part
of the blame. Many American psychiatrists stopped doing most kinds of talk
therapy because prescription writing was far more lucrative. A psychiatrist
receiving three patients in an hour and writing prescriptions will make more
money than he would doing an hour of talk therapy. Better yet, the payment for
the twenty-minute session is often greater than that for one hour of talk
therapy.
As for the numbers, one in six Americans is taking an
anti-depressant. Yet we also know that physicians, especially primary care
physicians, tend to hand them out for just about anything.
Anyway, Dr. Max declares that our obsession with chemical
imbalances has caused us to overlook the social and cultural factors in
depression.
He does accept that some depressions come out of
nowhere. They seem to have no connection to the patient’s life experience. One
might say that he ought to look harder, but depression is not a singular
condition. At times there are biochemical causes—as in unipolar depression—but
more often there are not.
He offers the gruesome case of a woman had very good reason
to be severely depressed:
I
remember being asked to see a middle-aged woman who’d come into A&E because
she was so depressed she’d stopped eating and drinking.
She was
a shell of a human being, totally exhausted and devastated by her depression.
She’d previously been admitted for it and little seemed to make it better. She
was so depressed she could hardly be bothered to look up.
It
transpired it was the anniversary of the deaths of her husband and two
children, caused when she had momentarily fallen asleep at the wheel of the
family car.
Is what
she was experiencing a problem with her brain chemistry? As I listened to her
story, her voice thin and distant, her eyes dead and hollow, I asked myself
what other possible response there could be to what had happened.
Of course, this is extreme. The woman manifestly feels
enormous guilt for a mistake that destroyed the lives of those she loved the
most. Surely, we are not in the realm of brain chemistry. Even if the guilt and
depression has influenced her brain, taking a pill is not going to make it all
right.
Were you to ask me—I know you haven’t—I would say that
religion would probably provide more comfort than a psychiatrist’s office. For
people who feel socially dislocated, religion provides community. It binds
people together. In effect, that is what the Latin root— religio-- means. Could it be that destroying everyone’s religious
faith has left people alone and bereft when facing tragedies?
Dr. Max adds this:
I’ve
thought the same when I’ve worked with patients with depression who’ve survived
genocide and seen terrible atrocities, or at the less extreme end of the scale,
the single mum who’s living in a high-rise with screaming kids, trying to make
do on a minimum wage job.
Culture warriors have destroyed people’s connection to
religion. They have undermined the other social institution that binds people
together—the military—and have done significant damage to marriage and family.
Thus, people feel increasingly alone and isolated. They
suffer from pervasive social anomie. I suspect that there is more anomie in countries
like Great Britain, and even America, than in Italy or Greece. These countries are not doing well... so people must feel more of a need to hang together. In our prosperous nation, people are too full of themselves. They no longer
respect social institutions. They feel radically unbound. You are not going to
fix it with anti-depressants. You will certainly not fix it with opioids.
8 comments:
So many different kinds and anti-depressants perhaps because people respond to one kind and not the other, or because of adverse interactions with other medications?
Do the English have the same definition for depression as here in the US?
Presumably, they do. To the best of my knowledge most prescriptions today are for SSRIs-- and not the MAO inhibitors or the tricyclics. If anyone knows otherwise please inform us. I think you are aiming at an important point... many SSRIs are prescribed in conjunction with a cocktail of other medications... so the stats are generally a bit skewed. Apparently, if you add all psychiatric medications, the nation that has the highest per capita consumption is France.
Overall no disagreement here.
I can't guess how many people I know who are on anti-depression meds, but the few I know, if you asked them if it was helping them be happier, I expect their answer would be something different - it helps them get out of bed and to work, so they don't lose their job, and so they can pay their bills, and do the same thing the next day.
And on my crude over-generalized analysis, debt seems to be a large part of the problem, that is to say people in debt have to work harder, second jobs, and so meds help them get their work done, and then they reward themselves by momentary pleasures of spending money they shouldn't, convincing themselves that they "deserve it", while this just keeps them in debt, and keeps them working so hard they need meds to keep working.
This analysis would put 100% of the blame on the people themselves, but they are enabled, and get caught in these cycles (whether payday loans for the ultrapoor, or holding credit card balances for middle class), because these solutions EXIST and WORK, and allow hard decisions on spending to be avoided, and once that habit works for a few years, its a hard habit to break. And even one person who declared bankruptcy a second time, with no credit now, she still works two jobs, and "rewards" herself by consumerism to feel better.
Oh, and to religion, we can also reflect that "megachurches" are the most popular ones, and they're so popular that you might as well stay home and watch the feel good preacher on the television and you can feel better by sending him $5 one week, and a year later find yourself giving 10% of your income to the televangelist, since the volunteer callers are so kind when they ask for more, and sometimes they'll listen to your problems sympathetically, and offer prayers, and sells prosperity gospel promises for future returns on every penny given to God.
I guess cynicism is one defense against depression. How do you tell other people to live below your means when you yourself don't have to?
Beats me. I'm not depressed. My buttons are not depressed, either.
Your shirt's depressing.
AO, do you believe anyone on this blog cares whether you disagree or. It?
My shirt's neutral, Jack. Why you dissin' my shirt, Huh? You can't even SEE my shirt, so it's all in YOUR mind, and not on MY back, Jack! Unless you had some other shirt in mind. In which case, all is forgiven.
Sam, your wardrobe talk about you.
Post a Comment