Remember Scott Israel? Remember the Broward County Sheriff,
the man whose department bears the most responsibility for the Nikolas Cruz
shooting spree in Stoneman Douglas High School? Remember the man whose deputies
were called to the Cruz home dozens of time, who were told repeatedly that Cruz
was a danger… and who did nothing? Remember the man whose deputy, assigned to
the Parkland High School, ran away and ducked for cover as soon as the shooting
started?
I suspect that you only have a vague memory of Sheriff Scott
Israel. After all, you have learned from a motley band of high school students that
the fault for the massacre lies with the NRA. And besides, Israel declared that
he had done nothing wrong, and so did not need to resign his post.
Many of us have found Israel’s dereliction of moral
responsibility to be disgraceful and deplorable. He has resisted all of them.
The
sheriff has resisted calls from nearly 100 Florida lawmakers to resign, and he
refused to participate in a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on the shooting
in March.
Now, The Daily Caller reports, the Broward Deputies
Association will have an opportunity to vote no-confidence in Scott Israel:
The
Broward Sheriff’s Office Deputies Association has scheduled a no-confidence
vote for Sheriff Scott Israel over his behavior during the lead-up to and
aftermath of the Parkland school shooting, union president Deputy Jeff Bell
announced Friday.
The
union is accusing Israel of “many instances of suspected malfeasance,
misfeasance, failure to maintain fiduciary responsibility by the sheriff, failure
to properly investigate possible criminal conduct by members of his senior
command staff and the lack of leadership that has crushed morale throughout the
agency.”
The last point is worth underscoring. If Sheriff Israel is
not at fault, if he did everything right, then the deputies must be at fault.
When leaders resign they do so in order to preserve the morale of their troops.
1 comment:
Morale in the ranks is, I'm fairly certain, low. May well be lower than low.
Post a Comment