Somehow or other, for reasons that defy reason, the
presidency of an African-American man did nothing to reduce the incidence of
crimes committed by people of color. No one is really willing to face the fact of so calamitous a failure, so our intelligentsia is looking for other ways to deal with the problem.
Political leaders are refusing to hold criminals to account. Thus, pretend that criminal acts are not criminal acts. After all, the Obama justice department, civil libertarians, media
pundits and black lives matter activists have focused like a laser beam on
faulting white police officers. They exonerated criminals and cannot understand why this produced more crime. Who could have imagined such a thing?
The media is colluding with the police in covering up the problem by ignoring it. They understand that crime statistics will drop if fewer crimes are
reported. In those great bastions of Western liberal order, Sweden and Germany, political leaders cover up their embarrassment over the crime that so-called refugees brought with them by not reporting the crimes or by not reporting the ethnicity of criminals. At least, it makes the statistics look better... and we all care mostly about appearances, don't we.
This sends the message that law and order is a
white concept. Thus, it does not apply to minority citizens. Having been
mistreated by the white power elites in the past people of color should get a pass on crime. They are
exempted from following the rules. Thus, the culture can focus on punishing or guilt tripping the true perpetrators, the white police.
The attack against the police is producing another
predictable consequence. The men and women who keep us safe have decided that
it is too risky to do their jobs. Thus, they turn a blind eye on crime. Professor
Eugene O’Donnell has explained (via Maggie’s Farm) that the police have in many
cases “gone to ground.”
American
policing today is in a state of slow-motion collapse, struggling mightily to attract
new officers — no matter how low standards are dropped.
Under
sustained assault by the City Council, pundits and self-styled civil-liberties
advocates, a new generation of New York City cops is being conditioned to avoid
showdowns with civilians, especially where coercion or force is called for. We
could have saved the costly investment in body cameras by explicitly telling
the cops two words: “Do nothing.”
Officers
who do more engagement than what is absolutely required have been threatened by
HQ that they’ll find themselves on a list of “troublemakers.” Thousands have,
or will soon, head for the exits, telling all within earshot to avoid police
work as a career.
In many
parts of the country, the police have gone to ground.
More and more police have decided that it simply is not
worth the trouble to engage or to confront potential malefactors:
The
truth, however, is that the proliferation of video recording of cops’ every
interaction only will increase officers’ timidity. That will look like
self-restraint in some cases, but overall it’ll put law enforcement on the
defensive and dull cops’ instincts.
String
together a series of adversarial videos, and almost every officer can find him
or herself fast-tracked to trouble.
The
new-era calculation for the police is: Conflict is the quickest path to
extinction.
Why risk your career and your livelihood to protect people
who do not appreciate you. The Giuliani era policy of policing the most minor
infractions has been discarded:
Scratch
the surface in trendy, uber-safe New York neighborhoods and you will hear
public safety and disorder concerns from more than a few. Aggressive
panhandling, unreported petty and retail thefts, noise and disorder complaints
and a feeling of insecurity on mass transit accompany complaints by those in
public housing and poorer communities that violence is never too far away.
If we want to call this by its name, this is the Obama
legacy on minority crime. Apparently, the Obama presidency, led by a man of impeccable decorum, did not produce more of the same in minority communities. It was seen as permission to defy the law. Of course, we are not allowed to hold our great former leader responsible, so why not scapegoat the police?
5 comments:
I'm not so certain that Obama is responsible for this. Some, maybe. Seems to me it's more due to Democrat mayors.
And quite possibly governors, too.
This is the natural consequence of the cowardly, mindless statistical scientism of “disparate impact.” The cops on the beat have choices in the face of risk. Those police officers are now negatively exercising those choices to minimize/eliminate their risk, as the article shows. Why? Show a rational reason they should do their job! It’s entirely rational to avoid risk, and no law, nor policy, can stop non-action... the accused will ALWAYS be able to fall back on the hazy interpretation of “discretion.” Again, it reinforces the most potent antidote to American liberal fantasies around compulsion: despite all imagined evidence to the contrary, you cannot actually make someone do something. You just can’t. Every human being has REFUSAL as an available option.
James, what do you think?
Stuart: The men and women who keep us safe have decided that it is too risky to do their jobs. Thus, they turn a blind eye on crime.
Sure, police won't do their job if cameras risk showing when they're being abusive or plant evidence afterwards. It must be frustrating. I certainly wouldn't want cameras following me all the time second guessing my boring or life-and-death decisions.
Post a Comment