Roger Simon calls it a Jexodus, an exit of American Jews
from the Democratic Party. Is it happening? Is it real? Will it have
consequences? We do not know. After all, most liberal Jews are currently consuming
themselves with rage to fight Donald Trump, a man they believe to be the reincarnation of
Adolph Hitler. They persist in kowtowing to the most anti-Israeli
president in American history: that would be Barack Obama. They're the gang that couldn't think straight.
So, yesterday, President Trump announced his recognition of
Israel’s right to control the Golan Heights. At the same time, Democratic presidential candidates have announced that they will
not be attending this year’s AIPAC meeting. By their lights the America-Israel
Political Action Committee—the one that was roundly denounced by Rep. Ilhan
Omar—did not represent their values. One suspects that those values prominently include appeasement and surrender.
Simon explained:
The day
Donald Trump announced the recognition of Israeli control of the Golan Heights
is the same day it was reported that none--that's zero--- of the many 2020
Democratic Party presidential candidates would be speaking at or attending the
AIPAC (America-Israel Public Affairs Committee) annual meeting later this
month.
MoveOn.org
had urged on them to avoid the conference, which has historically bent over
backward to be welcoming to Democrats, and the candidates complied like dutiful
lemmings.
As you know, MoveOn.org is a Democratic political action
group, funded in considerable part by George Soros. You know Soros: if you
criticize anything he says you will be denounced for being anti-Semitic.
So, the new Democratic Party has cast its lot with Ilhan
Omar:
Meanwhile,
the same Democrat Party could not find it in itself directly to confront Rep.
Ilhan Omar's overt anti-Semitism and chose to water down their condemnation in
some vague pseudo-even-handed pabulum about opposing all discrimination.
And it cannot see that Trump has been wildly pro-Israeli:
All
this is happening while Donald Trump has been the most pro-Israel president
since Truman, who first recognized the state. Indeed, Donald may have passed
Harry, moving, as he did, the U.S. Embassy to Jerusalem (the first president to
honor that pledge) and walking away from the Iran deal that did nothing for
peace and only allowed the mullahs to wreak havoc in Syria and Yemen and
continue to threaten Israel with annihilation. Trump also placed restrictions
on the funding the Palestinians used to provide pensions to terrorists and
their families.
Trump's
approval of Israel's sovereignty over the Golan Heights is the natural outgrowth
of these policies. It is high time. Fifty-two years ago, when the Heights were
still under the control of the ruthless Hafez al-Assad, who, like his son
Bashar after him, had a proclivity for mass-murdering his own people, the Golan
was used as a high ground for firing artillery into Israel. Now it's used for
vineyards and as a staging area for Israeli medics to help save
the lives of the long-suffering Syrian people.
As you know, Jewish liberals have objected to Trump’s policy
on the Golan Heights… because they are afraid. I would mention what they are
afraid of, but it is more accurate to say that they are fearsome cowards… the
kind that happily embraced the pusillanimous policies of Barack Obama.
Now,
after Obama sat on his hands while Vladimir Putin annexed Crimea and took over
in Syria, liberal Democrats are afraid that Trump’s actions will embolden
Putin. For the record, how much have you recently been hearing about Putin?
Have you noticed that he has been eclipsed….
Simon says:
Yet
still, Jewish "liberals" object to Trump's actions. Dan
Shapiro--Obama's ambassador to Israel--got his knickers in the proverbial twist
on Twitter, complaining that there hadn't been sufficient "policy
planning" (gasp!) and the Russians might be upset, a pretty funny
accusation from people who were whining that Trump has been soft on Moscow for
the last two years.
But
then hypocrisy--and, even worse, fear--is the hallmark of the American
"liberal" Jew. They think that by standing up for everyone else but
themselves they will be seen as good guys and left to live their largely
successful lives unmolested, the same mistake made by their semblables in 1930s Berlin.
It's probably not a good idea to make the same mistake twice.
3 comments:
"But then hypocrisy--and, even worse, fear--is the hallmark of the American "liberal" Jew. They think that by standing up for everyone else but themselves they will be seen as good guys and left to live their largely successful lives unmolested, the same mistake made by their semblables in 1930s Berlin."
Weakness is never virtue, it's just weakness.
Weakness is also "wearing a KICK-ME sign on your back".
Nicely done (by both you and Simon). I heard someone on the radio say that the word from the neo-Democrats was that Israel and its American supporters are to be condemned because they're racist and (not kidding) "Islamophobic." Which is kind of like accusing the European Jews of the 30s and 40's of being racist (anti-Aryan) and Nazophobic.
Post a Comment