In one sense very little of what Andrew Sullivan says about
transgenders detransitioning is new. I have said as much for as long as I have
been following the public debate. Yet, it matters that another influential
intellectual is willing to denounce the transgender rights
movement for the moral abomination that it is. Mutilating children under the
aegis of science is very bad indeed. It needs to be stopped. Perhaps Sullivan’s
opinion will encourage others to shed some light on the subject.
As he puts it, the current social contagion seems mostly to be encouraging young
women to transition. It encourages them to see themselves as male and to start
hormone therapy. With the aid of organizations like Planned Parenthood they
have little difficulty getting the right prescriptions.
Obviously, the treatments are a medical horror. When these
young women wake up and discover that they are not really men, then they face another horror, detransitioning.
Sullivan writes:
They’re
women who, in their teens, realized that they were actually men, socially
transitioned to the other sex, and then underwent hormone therapy to change
their bodies, faces, and voices to become transgender men. After varying
amounts of time, however, they all realized they had made a big mistake,
stopped testosterone therapy, and “detransitioned” back to being who they were
before. They are now embarrassed, they say, but not ashamed. “I don’t identify
as anything,” one of them told me. “I just have two X chromosomes in the bag.”
Of course, they did not realize anything of the sort. They
were brainwashed into believing something that defied reality. As for being
embarrassed, but not ashamed, it’s a distinction without a difference.
Embarrassment is simply a milder form of shame.
The medical consequences of their decisions are none too
pretty:
These
women live every day with the consequences of their decision: tenacious facial
hair (one has to shave every three days) and body hair, deeper voices,
permanently enlarged clitorises. They also suffer from the effects of “binding,”
i.e. wearing a breast corset of sorts, to flatten their chests, so they can
pass more easily as men. “I have back issues, lower lung capacity, and
permanent dents around my shoulders,” one told me. “Every now and again, I have
to push a rib back in to breathe,” another recounts. “I have permanent
bruising,” another explains. “Serious back issues,” says another, who cannot
carry a backpack for long without pain. “We get ‘sir’ed at Dunkin’ Donuts every
time,” one joked.
Of course, we are told, Sullivan continues, that this is all
taking place under the most strict medical supervision. Poppycock… as they say:
And yet
all these women became trans quite suddenly after puberty, found affirmation
immediately, and got testosterone easily. One says she told her mom one evening
that she was having a sleepover with friends, but instead drove hundreds of
miles to a Planned Parenthood through the night in search for help with
transitioning. Within a couple of hours, after telling her life story, she says
she was diagnosed as trans by a social worker, who was impressed by her
tenacity in driving so far, and was started on testosterone therapy before even
getting any results from blood work. Another got diagnosed online, and got
testosterone in the mail.
It is so obviously a social contagion that only the
Australian Psychological Society does not accept the obvious. Statistics from
Great Britain tell the story:
In
2009–2010, there were reportedly 32 girls and 40 boys referred to the center
for treatment. Since 2018, there have been 624 boys and
1,740 girls, overwhelmingly in their teens. One explanation is that, as stigma
declined, more transgender kids identified themselves as such. But the shift
toward girls, compared with boys, suggests that something else may be going on.
Why should the female share of transgender patients suddenly shift from 44
percent to 74 percent girls in a decade?
Since teenage girls are so obviously the victims of this
contagion, you would expect that feminist thought leaders would be up in arms
about it. They are not. It tells you something about today’s feminism and the
urge for ideological conformity.
As we have noted in other studies, a large number of these
children are really gay. Their transgender identification appears therefore to
be a form of homophobia.
All the
women I spoke with who detransitioned now date women or don’t date at all.
Their transition was based entirely on how they felt at the moment, which they
now regard as a false signal about their long-term identity. Which prompts the
question: How much of the extraordinary surge in transgender girls is related
to their discomfort with being a lesbian? What role does homophobia play in
enabling transition?
Sullivan continues:
“Fast-track”
transitioning — some kids are brought by their parents to socially transition
as early as 2 years old — has also unnerved some gay men and lesbians. The vast
majority (studies range from 63 to 94 percent) of gender dysphoric kids turn out to be gay after puberty. So how can you tell
which gender-dysphoric kid is gay and just needs to be left alone, and which
one is trans and needs urgent treatment? Since the brain doesn’t fully develop
until you’re 25, how do we ever truly know who’s really trans and who’s
gay before then?
The last sentence is chilling. The human brain does not
develop until early adulthood. And yet, we as a society are willing to subject
children to treatments that will alter their biology forever… on the say so of
their parents and social workers.
You recall the recent case in Texas where a women, a mother and
a pediatrician, has decided that she will force her seven-year-old son to
transition into girlhood… and where her estranged husband sued her for custody.
Keep in mind this woman is not some rube from the sticks. She is a licensed
physician.
One day our legal profession is going to see this as a pot of gold and is going to sue these physicians and counselors for everything they have. It will be one of the few occasions when we will be on the side of the lawyers.
4 comments:
https://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2019/oct/30/ginny-ehrhart-georgia-republican-pushes-felony-cha/
The more civilized parts of American are responding to the chemical castration and medical deformation of children. The alphabet people meanwhile are busy digging their own graves. This could be the break that sets off the deluge.
The normals are joining the fight and forcing the issue. Let’s make the ghouls and goblins stand up in public and defend their indefensible positions so we know exactly who to sue for damages and who needs a good tar and feathering.
This practice will be regarded as one of the most shocking and barbaric episodes in modern history.
How about "only the person who wants to be changed is allowed to request the change", and only after the person reaches the age of consent, either 18 or 21? NOBODY ELSE.
What is interesting is that ALL of these parents leading the charge for 'de-balling' their sons are female.
Every one.
Bringing up Taki again....they write about how the movement is really men cancelling women out...there is no such thing; "women" are whatever a person says they are. And since that would be men who claim to be "transgender," it means men are now deciding what a "real" woman is....to the point that the recent cycling champion is taunting the women he beat, with such as "You should WANT strong competition!" and "You're just complaining about being beaten."
I think young girls are pushed so much with this "power, strength, independent woman" thing that they expect it, and as they grow into women and see that biology still holds, there are still limitations and disadvantages, they're still human with frailties and "girls rule" is not true...they decide they must be "male," after all.
Then Milo, on his page, had an article about how it's a type of domination, with sadistic elements, over women, to force them to accept men into their spaces, to shame them, to force them to acknowledge that that their biology means nothing, that "womanhood" is easily had, as it is whatever someone (a man, at that) says it is.
Interesting stuff. What a trick society has played on itself....the idea that if you don't match the stereotype at the far end of your sex, you must not BE that sex---wow.
Post a Comment