Feminism as a Libido Suppressant

If this doesn’t make your day, I don’t know what will.

I would also be surprised if the results of this scientific study come as a surprise. Gender equality, Psychology Today reports, suppresses libido, for men and women, but especially for women. Link here.

Now, tell me, you suspected it already, didn‘t you? But you were afraid to say it out loud.

To be perfectly fair, I would mention that some people might want to suppress libido; some couples might use it as an effective contraceptive technique. Better than the pill; better than the IUD; even better than abstinence: feminism.

But if you want to get it on more often, then you would do best to ignore feminist illusions of gender equality.

So, what turns women on? The research says that it’s male dominance. As you know, the feminist mind will take this to be a total obscenity.

The authors of the Psychology Today article explain: “Almost every quality of dominant males triggers arousal in the female brain: dominant scents, dominant gaits, deep voices, height, displays of wealth. Romance heroes are almost always high status alpha males--billionaires, barons, surgeons, sheriffs. Avon Books and Ellora's Cave feature no heroes who are kindergarten teachers, accountants, or plumbers. Even though there's been a trend away from the conspicuously rapey bodice-rippers of the seventies and eighties, women still want strong, dominant men.”

This implies that men are aroused, not only by being dominant, but by being with submissive women: “On the other hand, most men are aroused by being dominant, as evidenced by the massive cross-cultural popularity of dominance-themed adult Web sites for men…..Our mammalian brains come wired with very ancient sexual preferences, quite prominent in the most popular forms of male and female erotica preferred by Homo sapiens. Men are aroused by being dominant and by submissive women, women are aroused by being submissive and by dominant men. In the bedroom, inequality beats equality.”